logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

14 Pages<1234>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Yada  
#51 Posted : Saturday, March 7, 2009 6:55:49 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:11 AM, "SL" wrote:

Dear Mr.Yada,
I remember(if not mistaken) hearing one of your audios that you said that the anti-christ will probably come from somewhere in Turkey. Recently there had been so many rumours that Obama is not born in America but somewhere in Africa(Kenya I suppose?). My question is could Obama be the anti-christ or someone who paves way for the anti-christ? Is America going to collapse under his audacious plans? Many companies are going bankrupt and been taken away by the government. I am also terrify about his plan to abort babies even when they are born, see this video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzozNDSsUgQ . Personally I am a person who wants to know what is right and what is wrong. What we can do and what we are not allowed to do. Also I believe Yahweh will greatly bless your work towards exposing Islam. Your advice is appreciated :)


With best regard & best wishes
-SL (Student)


Yada's response:

Quote:
SL,

The AC could come from Turkey, but it isn't likely because Turkey isn't a newly formed nation, nor is it small. The AC cannot come from Africa unless it is from Egypt--and then the same issues apply on size and age.

My guess is that the AC will come from Macedonia or somewhere else in the alphabet soup group of ethnic enclaves that make up the Balkans. They are small countries, newly formed, and were under the dominion of both Greece and Rome.

BO has most of the AC's attributes, but he isn't the AC. We are still 16 years away from knowing the identity of the AC. But by studying BO's ability to fool people with sweet-sounding lies, his style and agenda, you'll understand the AC better.

Yes, America is going bankrupt. But BO isn't totally to blame. Guys like Wilson, Morgan, Rockefeller, FDR, Eisenhower, LBJ, Reagan, and Bush one and two have made massive contributions to our decline. All BO has done is accelerate the fall. It's over, I'm sad to say, for America.

If you want to know what is right and wrong, invest the 100 hour necessary and study Yada Yahweh. It will give you a solid foundation upon which to exercise sound judgment.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#52 Posted : Sunday, March 8, 2009 9:46:46 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:14 AM, "JL" wrote:

Hello Yada,

I was wondering if you could answer a question for me or point me in the right direction. My problem is about Jacob and his wrestling match. My curiousity about this event was resurrected when I did a search about it on yadayahweh.com.

Yashar:
The Messianic advent would not be Yahushua’s first visit to planet earth. He walked with Adam and Abraham. He spent forty days with Moses revealing His prescription for the human mind, body, heart and soul. He wrestled with Ya’aqob, naming him Yisra’el once he proved worthy.

Paralambono:

God talked, walked, and ate with Abram as the beriyth/covenant relationship was initiated. (Genesis 17 and 18) Three: In a
meeting that included a wrestling match with Satan, Yahushua blessed Ya’acob making the trustworthy patriarch Yishra’el/one who strives with God. (Genesis 32)

Azab:

Yahuweh’s third return was to observe Ya’aqob’s wrestling match with Satan, in which the patriarch
proved himself worthy of being Yisra’el—Yahuweh’s witnesses to mankind.
(Genesis 32)

I know that some of the rabbis say that Jacob actually wrestled with Sama'el (Satan) the guardian angel of Esau, and I know how much you love rabbinic judaism, but I find this unfeasible due to Hosea 12:3-5. I wonder if you could give me some insight.

YHWH Bless You,
-J


Yada's response:

Quote:
J,

One of the challenges of writing YY is that I'm learning as I go. That is why I'm spending all of my time now editing the book, correcting and adding information based upon what I have learned.

It is commonly taught that Ya'acob wrestled with Yahshua, and he may have done so, but upon translating the passage, it also became clear that Yahshua met with Ya'acob after he successfully endured a Satanic test. And that is when He named him Yisra'el--one who strives and endures with God.

I have not edited, or even read, the section of the book which discusses this meeting in several years. In that it is located in Shav, chapter 6 of volume 3, I will get to it as I make my way through the Miqra'ey chapters. But since I found it, I have posted it below for your consideration. I was unaware that some rabbis are also aware of this, but I'm not surprised, in that it is the most logical rendering of the text.

So, I may have written the "He wrestled with Yah'aqob" statement prior to translating the actual passage, or I may have had a senior moment and not coveyed the meeting accurately. Either way, you have found something which needs to be corrected.

Yashar will read: "He met with Ya'aqob, naming him "Yisra'el" when Ya'aqob proved himself worthy in a bout with Satan."

Paralambano isn't inaccurate since it doesn't say who wrestled with Satan, but it could be clarified.

The Azab statement is accurate.

Thank you,

Yada

Here is the section from which my conclusions were drawn. Mind you, it was written several years ago and it has not been edited since then.

In Genesis we learn that Ya’aqob and Esau were twins born to Abraham’s son Isaac and his wife Rebekah. But they fought, even in the womb: "The children struggled together within her..so she went to Yahuweh to inquire why. Yahuweh said, ‘Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples shall be separated (parad - divided, dispersed, and scattered) from your body. One shall be stronger (amas - more determined, bolder, and courageous) than the other, and the older [Esau] shall serve the younger [Ya’aqob].’ Now the first [Esau] came out (yose’t - came forth into exile and captivity; used in context with the rising or coming forth of the sun) red all over like a hairy (se’ar - furry like an animal or beast; a term used by Isaiah to diagnose leprosy) garment made of fur, and they named him Esau. Afterward his brother came forth with his hand holding onto Esau’s heel, so his name was called Ya’aqob. When the boys grew up, Esau became a cunning hunter (sayid - one who tracks down, captures, and kills referring to the act and to the victim) and a man of the open land (saday). But Ya’aqob was a man free of fault (tam), dwelling in (yasab) tents (ohel)." (Genesis 25:22-27)

The two nations in Rebekah’s womb were Israel, the people of Yahuweh, and the nation of Halal - one conceived in Babylon but called different names at different times like Assur, Baal, and Islam, Assyrian, Canaanite, and Muslim. By way of confirmation, for Shiite Muslims, Assura Day remains their holiest holiday. While Allah is dressed in moon god symbols, Muslims are really submitting to Satan, the sun god.

By the measure of human power, Esau was stronger than Ya’aqob except briefly during the reign of David and again now, in our time, beginning with the 1948 War of Independence and culminating with the Islamic Magog War of the Tribulation. The real difference in their strength resides in the spirit allied with them. And that is the essence of this story. Yisra’el is a people separated unto Yahuweh by way of His Qadosh/Set-Apart Spirit, while those who serve Allah are associated with the spirit of deception.

This is further symbolized by Esau’s name, the description of his birth, and the nature of his garment. Esau is based on asah which has several interesting and prophetically relevant connotations: "to bruise, to fight, and to displease." Its paleo-Hebrew is so similar to asoq, meaning "an oppressive tyrant and guilty person who troubles and crushes," that the noun follows Esau’s name in most dictionaries. Throughout Scripture, Esau is Baal’s ally so it should not surprise us that his descendants are Muslims, or that they live to "fight and bruise" Jews, the behavior most noted for "displeasing" Yahuweh. And in Islam, the Messiah is named Isa/Esau, not Jesus/Yahushua.

Here is an example of Muhammad’s teaching from Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 425: "Allah’s Apostle said, ‘By Him in Whose Hands my soul is [Allah/Satan], son of Mary (Isa/Esau) will shortly descend amongst you people (Muslims) as a just ruler and will break the Cross and kill the pig [Jews] and abolish the Jizyah (a tax taken from the non-Muslims, who are in the protection, of the Muslim government). Then there will be abundance of money and no-body will accept charitable gifts." Lovely.

That is followed by: Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 426: "Once Umar was informed that a certain man sold alcohol. Umar said, ‘May Allah curse him! Doesn't he know that Allah's Apostle said, "May Allah curse the Jews."’" And lest we forget: Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177: "Allah’s Apostle said, ‘The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."’"

God chose yose’t to describe Esau’s birth because it was prophetically descriptive of all who serve the Adversary. Esau "came forth into exile and captivity in context with the rising or coming forth of the sun" better known as Satan. That is why Islam means submission in Arabic and why alah is so descriptive of Halal in Hebrew.

The wardrobe of the beriyth/relationship and the azab/damnation is very different. Yahuweh’s Qadosh/Set-Apart Spirit, His "Garment of Light," anoints those of us who are saved in such a way God can no longer see our iniquity. His Light extinguishes darkness making us appear perfect in His eyes. It is why Ya’aqob "was a man free of fault." In Yahuweh’s eyes he was tam - "upright, truthful and complete." Tam is "a rare poetic term often translated perfect but not carrying the sense of being totally free from fault because it was used of quite flawed people." Ya’aqob’s flaws were obliterated by the purity and brilliance of Yahuweh’s Garment of Light, His Qadosh/Set-Apart Spirit, enabling him to "yasab/dwell temporarily and permanently" in this world and in the next, inside Yahweh’s "ohel -"tent or Tabernacle."

King David is another example of a flawed person who was covered in this spiritual garment of light. It explains why, in spite of some rather unsavory human failings, he was considered righteous. Yahuweh’s Spirit, His Garment of Light, provides the cure for the consequence of bad behavior and singularly facilitates beriyth/relationship.

Desperate for one of these, Halal/Allah inspired Muhammad to say: "Gabriel brings to the sun [Satan’s symbol] a garment of luminosity from the light of Allah’s Throne according to the measure of the hours of the day. The garment is longer in the summer and shorter in the winter, and of intermediate length in autumn and spring. The sun puts on that garment as one of you here puts on his clothes." (Tabari I:232) Despite the obvious stupidity, Allah/Halal covets a garment of light more than the universe itself because it is the lone gift capable of reconciling him with God. But he can’t get one because it can’t be worn by a deceiver. The Devil’s cloak is like that of his servant Esau: bestial, diseased and drenched in blood.

Not surprisingly, Muhammad saw Jesus/Isa/Esau as red and hairy: Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 54, Number 462: "The Prophet said, ‘On the night of my Ascent to the Heaven..I saw Esau/Jesus, a man of medium height and moderate complexion inclined to the red color and of lank hair." And: Volume 4, Book 55, Number 607: "Allah’s Apostle said, ‘On the night of my Ascension to Heaven, I saw Esau/Jesus who was of average height with red face as if he had just come out of a bathroom." Not to be outdone by Number 608: "Esau/Jesus was a curly-haired man." And of course, the ever popular Number 644: "Jesus is Allah’s Slave."

This Satanic theme presented Scripturally continues with Esau’s occupation. He is a sayid - "one who tracks down, captures and kills." But interestingly, a sayid is also the "victim of the hunt." In other words, team Esau/Islam will be tracked down, captured and killed in perfect harmony with Satan’s nature, duplicity and cunning. The model was Nimrod - the Babylonian/Assyrian king who was also called "a mighty and cunning hunter against God." Nimrod and his wife invented the basis of virtually every sun and moon god religion in human history - Christianity and Islam included.

Yahuweh called Esau a nomad by using saday, but there is more to the word than "open country or field." Saday is used in Deuteronomy 21 to designate the place a slain person is found that must be cleansed of sin prior to being settled. This is accomplished by "breaking the neck of a heifer," symbolic of Satan. In Leviticus 17:5, the saday is a place opposite of the Tent or Tabernacle Meeting in which anyone who continued to make sacrifices there was to be cut off and separated from Yisra’el. In the 7th verse, Yahuweh tells Moses that such unsanctioned sacrifices were for satanic demons and that they were made by unfaithful and immoral people.

Now that the battle lines between good and evil have been drawn and we know who was serving whom, it was time for Ya’aqob to prove himself worthy of such an auspicious calling. For that, we turn to Genesis 32: "Ya’aqob was left (yatar - spared and preserved) by himself (bad - set apart) and he wrestled (‘abaq - grappled with, was physically engaged grabbing and holding) the Man (‘iysh - one who exists, is extant and present, a male, husband, servant, champion, and counselor) with him until the time and place the predator and plunderer (‘ad ) arrived (‘alah - ascended, to take away, to cut off, to cause to burn in a holocaust), the Shachar (shachar - the sun appeared)." (Genesis 32:24)

The "one who exists and is present, the man, husband, servant, champion, and counselor" is Yahuweh in human form. That is clearly articulated in the conclusion of the passage and in the summation provided by Hosea. Ya’aqob began the evening "spared and preserved," "set apart" because he was physically engaged in holding onto" God. But the test was provided by "‘alah Shachar - the arrival of Satan." Ya’aqob would have to prove himself worthy of being the embodiment of the beriyth/relationship just as Yahushua proved Himself worthy of being our savior. Both were tempted by Satan and prevailed.

Isaiah, in 14:12, tells us that "ben Shachar," the "son of the Dawn or Morning Star" is the fallen angel known as Satan. So I came to the conclusion that "‘alah shachar" describes Satan’s arrival for the following reasons: First, Isaiah, the only prophet to name the Adversary, defines him as Shachar. Second, "‘alah shachar" is redundant if describing "dawn." It would be like saying "the rise of the sunrise." Third, "‘alah shachar" appears twice before the "shemesh - the sun, the brilliant object which provides warmth, light, and life zarah - rose, came forth, began to shine, came out and appeared." If there were three sunrises in a single night, it would be celebrated as such, but it’s not. Fourth, there would be no reason for God to be pleased with overcoming or prevailing against Ya’aqob, which would be the unlikely moral of the story if "Shachar" were not Satan. Fifth, it makes no sense for Ya’aqob to be eager to leave God’s presence. He would be the least likely person on earth to desire separation. And sixth, the only other use of "‘alah shachar" is in Sodom - Satan’s playpen - where the angels wanted to get out of town before "‘alah shachar - Satan arrived" and Lot was swept away in temptation and punishment.

"When He [Yahuweh/Yahushua] saw (ra’ah - was shown, was delighted to discover) that he [Shachar] could not overpower and had not prevailed against (lo - not / yakol - overcome, gained control over, achieved victory over, possessed power against, conquered, dared or attained) him [Ya’aqob], he [Yahuweh/Yahushua] touched (naga - came nigh and reached out to) Ya’aqob’s hand, foot (kaph - palm and sole) and loin (yarek - genitals, the area of procreation) so it was dislocated (yaqa - wrenched) while he was physically engaged, grabbing and holding (‘abaq) him." (Genesis 32:25)

Ya’aqob and his descendants would be the hands, feet, and loins of God’s plan. Yisra’el and Yahuweh would walk together, work together, write together, and pave the way to relationship and redemption together. By being set apart, and by holding on to God, Ya’aqob had the means to overcome temptation. Given the choice between serving the prince of this world or the king of the next, Ya’aqob chose wisely. While his selection was more vivid and important than ours, in that the souls of all mankind were at stake, his story is being told for our benefit - so that we might make the same decision.

Ya’aqob wasn’t a very courageous fellow, but when it came to trusting Yahuweh, to being passionate and engaged, he was exemplary. "Then he [Ya’aqob] said, ‘Let me go (shalach - send me out, dispatch me, set me free, deliver and direct me) because Shachar [Satan] has come to rise and burn (‘alah).’ But he [Ya’aqob] said, ‘I will not go until you truly (kiy im - unless, indeed, surely) bless me.’ So He [Yahuweh/Yahushua] said to him, ‘What is your name (shem)?’ He answered, ‘Ya’aqob.’ Then he said, ‘Your name shall no longer be Ya’aqob, but Yisra’el (to stand upright, straight and be righteous, to be correct and pleasing, to be agreeable, right, justified, and straightforward with el meaning god), for you have striven (sarah - exerted yourself and endured) with God (elohim - the Mighty One, the Judge, the Almighty Spirit) and with men and have prevailed (yakol - attained success, been shown capable, have understood and been able to grasp the meaning of life).’" (Genesis 32:26-28)

The blessing was salvation. It would be the fulfillment of Yahuweh’s repeated promises to bless all mankind by way of Abraham, Ya’aqob’s grandfather. Yahushua would be one of Ya’aqob’s descendants. The means to salvation and the benefits of it are literally defined in Ya’aqob’s new name - Yisra’el: "to stand upright, straight and be righteous, to be correct and pleasing, to be agreeable, right, justified, and straightforward with God." Too bad so few people know what Yisra’el means, and fewer still are.

Yahuweh answered the question Ya’aqob asked by defining Yahushua - Yahuweh Saves. He blessed Ya’aqob by saving him. "Then Ya’aqob asked Him, ‘Please tell me your name.’ But He [Yahuweh/Yahushua] said, ‘How is it that you require my name?’ And He blessed him there. So Ya’aqob named the place the Facing God (Panu’el - from panah and el turning to look at, regard, and respect God) for ‘I have seen (ra’ah - viewed, perceived, been shown, looked upon, and found delight in the visible appearance of) God, face to face, and my soul (nephesh - mind, heart, body, and life) is saved (natsal - delivered, spared, rescued, graciously delivered from danger, defended and preserved).’" (Genesis 32:29-31)

Virtually all English translations say that Ya’aqob’s "life" was spared, but that isn’t true and it misses the point. Ya’aqob would ultimately die like everyone else, so his life wasn’t "graciously delivered from danger, defended, preserved or saved." Moreover, there is a perfectly good Hebrew word for "life" - chay. It is used two hundred times in Scripture, beginning with the creation account. Even Chavvah, Adam’s wife, was named "Life Giver." So what had been defended, saved, and preserved was Ya’aqob’s soul, his nephesh, not his flesh or mortal body.

This passage confirms something rabbis are wont to deny - God can and has manifest Himself in human form. This visit, Yahuweh’s third, transformed Ya’aqob into Yisra’el - the one who was defiant into one who now stood with Him. Yahuweh first manifest Himself in human form when He initiated His personal beriyth/relationship with Adam - the man He had created in His own image - when He walked in the garden. The second advent occurred at the beginning of the beriyth with Abraham when Yahweh walked, talked, and ate with the patriarch. The fourth commenced when Yahweh formalized the Beriyth/Covenant with Moses, revealing Genesis, Exodus and Leviticus. His fifth advent was Messianic and began as promised in a tent in Bethlehem during the Feast of Tabernacles. It culminated with the inception of the New Beriyth/Covenant. His resurrection was the sixth - the manifestation that proved that His atoning sacrifice provided victory over sin. His return will be the seventh.

This is why Ya’aqob is heard saying, "I have seen God and my soul is saved," immediately after Yahuweh told him that he had come to: "understand the meaning of life." Yahweh is the source of eternal life; to be with Him is to live. Yada Yahweh nephesh natsal. The means to salvation revolves around knowing the Savior.

"Now the sun (shemesh - the brilliant object which provides warmth, light, and life) rose (zarah - came forth, began to shine, came out and appeared) upon him just as he crossed over (‘abar - passed over) Penu’el [the face or presence of God]." (Genesis 32:32)

It wasn’t per chance that "‘alah shachar" appeared twice during the test or that "shemesh zarah" was used to demonstrate the warmth of Ya’aqob’s relationship with Yahuweh, or the brilliance of the enlightenment that had led to his salvation. Nor is it a coincidence that ‘abar means "pass over" and "cross" - the name of the rehearsal pointing to salvation and the instrument that delivered it. Ya’aqob chose Yahushua over Halal and was blessed with the ultimate gift - eternal life in the presence of God.

Yahuweh told Ya’aqob: "In you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed. And behold, I Am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land. For I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you." (Genesis 28:14-15) To which Ya’aqob responded: "Surely Yahuweh is in this place..how awesome is this place. This is the House of God, the gate to heaven... Then Ya’aqob made a vow saying ‘If God will be with me and will keep me on this journey that I take and will give me food to eat and garments to wear, and I return to my father’s home safely, then Yahuweh will be my God."

Hosea agrees that it was in this way that Ya’aqob demonstrated himself worthy of fathering the chosen people and Yahuweh proved that He was engaged in human affairs and reliable. Together they provided a parable of salvation. Ya’aqob had come to understand the meaning of life and to rely upon the life giver. But not all would be so enlightened. Ya’aqob’s descendants, while providing the womb for Yahushua’s fourth advent, dug in their heels and crucified the Messiah whom they had helped conceive. "In the womb (beten - the source of a woman’s posterity) he took (‘aqab) his brother by the heel (‘aqab -restraining, supplanting and circumventing him), and in his maturity (‘own - manhood, generative power and strength) he persevered with (sarah - exerted himself and strove with) God." (Hosea 12:3)

‘Aqab, the root of Ya’aqob’s name, is not only used twice in this verse, it has three different meanings. The first is the familiar "grasp the heel" or "grab hold of and restrain." It is derived from aqeb, meaning "heel," and was first used prophetically in reference to the battle between Yahushua and Satan outlined in Genesis. The second rendering is analogous to Satan’s scheme: "to hinder an action so as to cause it not to happen." The third reflects the means to his crime: "to deceive, to cause another to hold a mistaken belief using trickery." The pivotal event in human history is the crucifixion and resurrection. If ‘alah shachar could beguile the world into believing they didn’t happen, as Islam does, or deceive us into misunderstanding what actually happened, why it happened, who it happened to and for, the Devil has won.

With this introduction, let’s examine the first Scriptural reference to aqeb. It’s also found in Genesis. "Yahuweh said to the serpent: ‘Because you have done this, you are an abomination, detestable, abhorrent, evil, and cursed more than all the dumb beasts, and more than every living thing of the ground. On your belly you shall go, and you shall devour rubbish all the days of your life. And I will place enmity and hatred between you and the woman, and between your sowing and her posterity. He [Yahushua] shall overwhelm your position of influence, political power, and shaky rank, and you [Satan] shall bruise His heel (aqeb).’" (Genesis 3:14-15)

Satan has unleashed countless schemes and trickery to entice, corrupt, and harm Ya’aqob/Yisra’el, desperately trying to deceive the world into believing Yahushua’s atoning sacrifice did not happen. But the Devil is holding a losing hand. During the Messianic advent Yahushua provided the cure for Satan’s sting, at least for those who yada Yahuweh. In His seventh coming, the Prince of Peace will forever overwhelm the Adversary’s influence, power, and rank. The Devil shall be no more.

The next Ya’aqob story pertaining to aqeb can be found in Genesis 27 where Ya’aqob is shown using trickery to deceive his father Isaac into giving him the blessing and birthright of the firstborn child - in effect robbing his brother of the privilege of being the patriarch of God’s chosen people. Esau thus said, "Is he not rightly named Ya’aqob, for he has supplanted me, taking away my birthright and blessing." Then, when Esau turned forty he married two Hittite women in direct opposition to Yahuweh’s instructions "and they made life miserable for Isaac." He would come to say of his unfaithful son: "You shall live in unfertile and dry lands. You shall live by your sword." And he did.."For Esau bore a grudge against Ya’aqob..and said to himself.. ‘I will kill my brother.’"

We are told that Esau married Ishmael’s daughter, becoming the forefather of those who serve Allah by killing Jews. His descendants, today’s Muslims, would fulfill Yahuweh’s prophecy of them: "And he will be a wild ass of a man. His hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand will be against him. And he will live to the east in hostility with all his brothers." (Genesis 16:12)

In the 35th chapter of Genesis we have another Allah/Halal outing related to the travails of Ya’aqob and Esau. But before we explore it, keep in mind that there are six English variations of the same three Hebrew letters: Alef, or "A," Lamed, or "L," and Hay, or "H." The various pronunciations are a product of the vowel points that were added 2,000 years after the Torah was written. The first alah is "a spell or charm causing someone to grieve, weep or wail - to mourn over something that is devastating." The second variation is also rendered alah, a verb which means: "to curse or to bring a curse upon oneself, to be guilty and wrong." It means: "to imprecate, to invoke or call down evil. Alah "proves that someone is guilty as opposed to innocent." The third alah is directly translated: "execrate - to detest and to be utterly detestable, to abhor and to be an abomination, an evil curse which denounces, to be very bad." Alah implies "a sworn covenant or oath which is a curse from God for violating the Covenant." This vocalization of ALH denotes "God’s judgment on sin as a result of unfaithfulness." It is here that we learn that Alah means: "accursed - an adulterous person or erring tribe."

The same three Hebrew letters are also rendered elah - "oak tree often associated with cultic activity." Absalom’s hair was caught in an elah, and it led to his death. Elah is where David slew Goliath. It is a valley over which warring armies hurled insults. Elah was the last king in Israel - a puppet of Assyria and thus Assur, the sun god. "Elah is associated with Edom - Esau’s clan, descendants or nation." Biblically, Esau is connected to Muhammad and Allah by way of Ishmael and Baal. And finally, allah: "a tree under which false religion is practiced."

These variations of alah differ from the ‘alah used with shachar in the passages announcing Satan’s arrival during Ya’aqob’s trial. That rendering of ‘alah begins with the Hebrew Ayin, for which there is no equivalent English sound. Phonetically the Ayin is silent - not unlike the "h" at the end of Allah. In this case, the Hebrew letter Ayin, which is rendered by an apostrophe ( ’ ) in our transliteration of the sound into English, is followed by a "l" and a "h." This ‘alah means: "to take away, to arrive or ascend." ‘Alah also means "to burn, a burnt offering, or a holocaust."

But it was under the form of alah associated with the "detestable abomination" that we learn where Ya’aqob buried some dubious contraband. Earlier in Genesis we’re told that Rachel, Ya’aqob’s second wife, stole religious idols from her father’s collection. "So Ya’aqob said to his household and to all who were with him, ‘Put away the foreign gods which are among you, and purify yourselves. Change your garments. Let’s arise and go up to the House of God... So they gave Ya’aqob all the foreign gods which they had, and the rings which were in their ears. And Ya’aqob hid them under (tahath) the allah which was near Shechem. As they journeyed, there was a great terror upon the cities which were around them." (Genesis 35:2-5)

There are some rather delicious implications here. First, "foreign" is nekar, a word which implies that the pagan idols were imported from an alien land. And because we have been told who they belonged to, and how they got there, we can reasonably surmise that these false gods were from Ur - a city where Sin, a masculine moon god reigned supreme. Allah is modeled after Sin.

Second, the earrings were nezem - circles or halos associated with Lord/Baal and fertility-cult sun-god worship. Third, "hid" is taman, a word which describes Satan’s modus operandi: "to hide, conceal, cover up, keep something from being known, bury, and lie in wait."

Fourth, the "under" preceding allah has Islamic connotations as well. Tahath means: "to exchange one thing for another" - i.e., to replace Yahuweh with Allah. To tahath is "to place under foot." It is Islam, a form of "subjection that is the result of conquest." It is to be a Muslim, "to be burdened and oppressed." Related words mean: "cunning, lowly, lowest, vexing and burning."

Arabic is a distant cousin of Hebrew, albeit over 2,000 years younger. So when I came upon tahath and its meaning, I couldn’t help but recall a Hadith describing the formative moment of Islam. By way of background, the source of every Islamic Hadith related to Muhammad’s first Qur’anic revelation is Aisha. Muhammad was 50 he married this 6 year-old girl. She defined the term that has led us to this comparison. She said: "Muhammad practiced Tahanuth as was the custom of the Quraysh in the heathen days." (Ishaq:106) Then she reported: "Solitude became dear to Muhammad and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira where he would engage in the Tahanuth worship for a number of nights before returning to Khadija [Muhammad’s first wife and employer] and getting provisions for a like period, till truth came upon him while he was in a cave. The first form of revelation was a true vision in sleep. He did not see any vision but it came like the break of dawn.’" (Tabari, Book VI, Page 67) The break of dawn is ‘alah shachar, so the source of Muhammad’s vision is the sun god - Satan. It should be no surprise that Muhammad found Allah at night, while in a dark cave and while engaged in tahanuth - exchanging one spirit for another, this one a lowly and cunning spirit fixated on subjection, conquest, cunning, vexing and burning - the heart and soul of Islam as it is laid out in the Qur’an and practiced by Muhammad.

The Hadith continues to incriminate Allah’s little helper: "The angel [guess which one] said, ‘Muhammad, you are the Messenger.’ The Prophet said, ‘I had been standing, but fell to my knees; and crawled away, my shoulders trembling. I went to Khadija and said, "Wrap me up!" When the terror had left me, he came to me and said, "Muhammad, you are the Messenger of Allah."’ Muhammad said, ‘I had been thinking of hurling myself down from a mountain crag, but he appeared to me as I was thinking about this and said, "I am Gabriel [Halal, actually] and you are the Messenger." Then he said, "Recite!" I said, "What shall I recite?" He took me and pressed me three times. I told Khadija, "I fear for my life."’"

But Muhammad knew what had happened to him. He had been possessed by one of Satan’s demons, and as such, he was to establish the Devil’s most condemning religion. For the account we turn to Ibn Ishaq, who compiled the earliest and most accurate biography of Muhammad: "I thought, ‘Woe is me, I’m a possessed poet [the Qur’an, Allah’s Counterfeit, is recited in a poetic style].’" The worst thing that can befall a person is to be demon possessed. To his credit, Muhammad recognized what had happened. To his shame, he damned three billion souls along with his own.

Here is Muhammad’s immediate reaction in his own words: "I will go to the top of the mountain and throw myself down that I may kill myself and be at rest." He wanted to commit suicide - something that Satan could not allow. The Devil had big plans for his prophet. "So I climbed to the mountain to kill myself when I heard a voice saying, ‘Muhammad, you are Allah’s Apostle.’ I raised my head to see who was speaking and lo, I saw Gabriel in the form of a man with feet astride the horizon." (Ishaq, Sirat Rassul Allah, Page 106) How, pray tell, would this terrified and possessed poet distinguish between Gabriel and Halal? He couldn’t, and by his own account, his first revelation was a bad dream. "The Prophet said, ‘A good dream is from Allah, and a bad dream is from Satan.’" (Bukhari:V9B87N113)

Continuing to highlight the Islamic implications of the Genesis passage, the fifth incriminating bit of evidence is that the Hebrew form of allah used provides a rather exacting description of Muhammad’s Allah: "one who invokes or calls down evil." An association with this Alah "proves that someone is guilty as opposed to innocent." Alah, like Allah is to: "detest and to be utterly detestable, to abhor and to be an abomination. Allah is an evil curse."

Sixth, Shechem, as Jordanian town, was part of the nation ascribed to Esau, the Lord/Baal Satan worshiper Yahuweh came to abhor. In the time of Muhammad, Jordan was called Syria. With that in mind, a ninth century Muslim scholar, Ibn al-Kalbi, reports Muhammad saying: "The first to change the religion of Ishmael, and set up images for worship, was Luhayy. He then became very sick and was told, ‘There is a hot spring in Syria. If you would go there you would be cured.’ So Luhayy went...
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#53 Posted : Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:00:18 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:22 AM, "F" wrote:

Yada,

I just reread the scriptures and all my last letters and thinking are still off. Early before sunrise the first day is our Sunday morning??? So Yahushua rose on the regular Sabbath before Sunset. I guess this has all been just going over my head. But as we approach the christians easter I want to be able to explain it correctly. "D" and I are rereading YY and Todd Bennett's book Restoration to each other every night before we fall asleep. WOW we have so much to learn.

Thank you for not getting frustrated with us all and our questions we thought we had figured out.

-F


Yada's response:

Quote:
F,

Yahshua rose on Bikuwrym/FirstFruits sometime after the sun set, ending the normal weekly Sabbath as well as the annual Sabbath of Matsah. All we know is that it occurred before the sun rose on the first day of the week, which we now call Sunday. So, using our way of keeping track of time, His resurrection occured on the evening of the Sabbath or in the wee hours of Sunday morning, well before sunrise. But, that said, it is irrelevent. The only things which matter are:

Daniel's Timeline
The Old Covenant's Prophetic Predictions and Explanations
Passover Feast
Passover Sacrifice
Unleavened Bread Sacrifice
The Sabbath Message
FirstFruits Harvest
The Renewed Covenant's Eyewitness Accounts Explaining these Fulfillments

Thursday, Friday, and Sunday are irrelevent.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#54 Posted : Monday, March 23, 2009 5:03:29 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:54 AM, 'SP' wrote:

Hi,

I have believed for a long time that there are major problems with Christianity today that will have to be dealt with. What you say could explain a lot, but how do I study the word of God. If none of the translations are good, and they were translated by groups of people, how do I trust the way you as one man translate it.

Is there a version of the word of God out there in English that I can read the whole books of that has proper translation in your view? Is there a church out there that teaches properly? I don't believe that God would make it so difficult for a person to learn and study His word that they would almost need to be a scholar in languages to do so. I believe in some way He would make His word available to all who want to learn from it, including simple lay people. Or where do you believe people should go to learn of God? Why are the latest translations, who claim to have gone back to the oldest text, still contain these errors? I understand why the Catholic church and some of the other older groups that relied on the Catholic translation would be wrong, but I don't understand completely why evangelical groups today who claim to go back to the oldest text would translate it incorrectly.

I am very intrigued by what you write, but not sure of how to verify it. It seems to ring true, but I think that about the Bible also. The bible has been very inspiring to me, and I feel God has spoken to my heart through it. I have learned a lot from it, but have many questions.

Sincerely,

-S


Yada's response:

Quote:
S,

I answer all of these questions in the prologue of the book called "Re'shith - Beginning." You will find it at the following URL: http://yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis.YHWH.

I have not asked you to trust my translations, but instead to verify them yourself. There are a host of free online tools you can use to do this as well as a list of the resources I used provided in the prologue. Since I included each important Hebrew or Greek word, all you have to do is look them up for yourself. After you've done this a number of times, and found them to be accurate, you will only need to spot check me on occasion from that point on to have confidence in the accuracy of the translations. You don't have to be literate in Hebrew or Greek to do so. It only requires a willingness to invest the time.

Your tendency to apply conditions and/or requirements on God is a very bad idea. What you think is fair doesn't matter. Placing our standards upon God is how religions are born.

The truth is that God provided all of this information clearly and accurately and religious men chose to conceal, corrupt, and counterfeit it. Since God gave us freewill, and since freewill is a requirement of love, it would have been wrong for Him to intervene and stop men from acting badly.

All that matters is that you have arrived at a place where the truth can be learned if you are willing to invest the time. Once you know what Yahweh said, you will be in a position of accepting or rejecting it, but not altering it. And if you accept it, you will be asked to share what you have learned with others.

Yada


A follow-up from "SP." Yada's comments are in blue:

Quote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:26 PM, "SP" wrote:

Hi,

Thank you for replying to me.

I didn't think about it as "applying conditions and/or requirements on God", but I see your point. I will have to give some good thought to that. I see so many people trying to put God in a box, and now I see I did the same thing. Thank you for showing that to me.

As soon as someone says "I can't believe that God would or wouldn't do or allow one thing or another, they are in essence "applying conditions and/or requirements on God"--or at least on their view of Him. And most often, these views are in conflict with either His Word, His nature, or His self-imposed limitations. In your case, your statements conflict with the limitations of interfearing with freewill. And that is a very complex and serious issue--one that lies at the heart of the religion vs. relationship debate between man and God.

I have been reading the info on your site and I understand what you are saying, but I find that I want to read the whole book translated so I can flip back and forth between books and subjects. Is there any translation out there or is one coming that applies essentially how you have translated it?

No, there isn't. But, YY is over 2000 pages long so there is plenty to read. And I'm constantly adding to it. I do have a topical arrangement of the book that a reader put together for me but I haven't had the opportunity to edit it yet so it isn't available.

If not, do you mind if I ask a question from time to time? or is there another place you would rather I go? I understand you probably get tons of emails, so I don't want to be a pest.

I would encourage you to read a volume at a time with a notepad by your side. When you are finished with a volume, please send me any unanswered questions or anything you think I got wrong or could have stated better. Hundreds of readers have done this and the book has become better as a result.

Also, if you look to the top of the YY home page, you will see a forum link. While I don't participate in the forum, some 400 readers of YY do, and they would be thrilled to meet you, answer questions, and fellowship with you.

Yada


Edited by user Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:58:16 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#55 Posted : Monday, March 23, 2009 5:18:10 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:56 AM, "J" wrote:

Hello.

Any theory about nephilim?

Maybe I wonder if there are individuals trying to hide information about nephilim.

Maybe
we should be careful who we trust and not trust someone just because they have a flying saucer.

Maybe it should not be surprising if host using demons show up publically during a time of disaster claiming to be benevolent primate evolving aliens and elohim saviours.

Perhaps reading sections called...

Genesis 6:1-5

and

Numbers 13:30-33

and

Deuteronomy 3:11-13

and

2 Samuel 21:18-22

and

2 Chronicles 33:2-3

and

Job 1:6-7

and

Isaiah 14:12-17

and

Isaiah 24:21

and

Isaiah 26:5

and

Jeremiah 10:10-15

and

Lamentations 4:17-19

and

Ezekiel 28:11-19

and

Daniel 2:40-45

and

Daniel 11:38-39

and

Obadiah 4

and

Habakkuk 1:8

...can help us learn about various beings and more.

Maybe history is an interesting word and we are living during an interesting time and it would not be unwise to be on the lookout for major false Messiah deceptions.

Maybe I should think more about Yahushua (spelling?) and love and repentance and less about grigori and nephilim and flying saucers and freemasonry.

Maybe people can learn stuff by observing rainbows and waterfalls and fruits and flowers and butterflies and tropical fish and kitties.

Maybe people should ask themselves if they believe in Yah and if they believe Yah was born as Yahushua (spelling?) and if they believe Yahushua (spelling?) died for sins before resurrecting and ascending to heaven.

Maybe The Son has a Hebrew Name that the name Joshua stems from and that Yahushua is a transliteration of.

Maybe you will study a section called Zechariah 6:11-13 and ask yourself if you truly believe a section called Matthew 1:21 was originally written in Greek and study a section called Acts 7:45 and then ask yourself if The Son and someone called Joshua the son of Nun have a Name in common.

Maybe Yah is a transliteration of yod-heh and Yahu is a transliteration of yod-heh-waw and Yahushua is a transliteration of yod-heh-waw-shiyn-ayin.

Perhaps reading sections called...

Genesis 3:15

and

Genesis 22:7-12

and

Genesis 49:9-12

and

Deuteronomy 18:15-19

and

1 Kings 8:26-27

and

1 Kings 9:10-13

and

1 Chronicles 17:4-14

and

Psalm 2

and

Psalm 16:8-11

and

Psalm 18:3-7

and

Psalm 22

and

Psalm 31:11

and

Psalm 34:19-20

and

Psalm 41:9

and

Psalm 47:5

and

Psalm 68:18-20

and

Psalm 69:16-21

and

Psalm 118:22-26

and

Psalm 132:10-18

and

Proverbs 30:4

and

Isaiah 7:14-16

and

Isaiah 9:1-7

and

Isaiah 11-12

and

Isaiah 25

and

Isaiah 26:19

and

Isaiah 28:14-16

and

Isaiah 42:1-9

and

Isaiah 49-50

and

Isaiah 52:10

and

Isaiah 53

and

Isaiah 63:5

and

Isaiah 63:8

and

Jeremiah 23:5-8

and

Jeremiah 33:14-26

and

Daniel 7:13-14

and

Daniel 9:24-27

and

Hosea 6:1-3

and

Amos 8:9-10

and

Jonah 1:17

and

Micah 5:2

and

Zechariah 2:8-13

and

Zechariah 6:11-13

and

Zechariah 9:9

and

Zechariah 11:10-13

and

Zechariah 12:10

and

Zechariah 13:4-9

and

Malachi 4:2

...can help us learn about Yahushua (spelling?) and more.

Maybe we are living in a grand story and there is a big picture that is more marvelous and more full of purpose than any created being realizes.

Maybe a minority of humans have heard of something called the Book of Enoch and the internet is helping to bring stuff to light and we are living during an interesting time when men and women can find translations of ancient texts online.

Maybe repentance is the most underappreciated word in the English language that is not a transliteration of a Name and nothing is worth living for if Dad is not worth living for.

-J


Yada's response:

Quote:
The answer to your question is in the Noah chapter. Out of context, it reads:


An errant rendering of naphylym in the next verse, is almost always translated to infer that “giants” were living on the earth. I can only assume that the Latin scholars who did so, missed the religious connotations and assumed that physical prowess would be the only reason to mention such people. “The Naphylym (naphylym – plural of naphal, meaning those who prostrate themselves, who have fallen away, who are oppressed, cast down, and die) existed (hayah) in the (ba ha) land (‘erets – region) in that day (yowm – time), and also (gam) afterward (‘ahar – at a later time).” (Genesis 6:4)

From the beginning, Satan’s religions have all had his victims bowing down, prostrating themselves to a false god. As a result of having ignored Yahweh and His Word, out of apathy, ignorance, and/or convenience, they become victimized by religion and are oppressed in this life and then either die, or are cast down in the next.

Today (read ‘ahar/at a later time), the people best known for their repetitive prostrates are Muslims. That’s significant because Naphysh was also the second-to-last son of Ishmael, Islam’s patriarch. And as you might suspect, the Naphysh were an “Arabian tribe.” That is to say that Islam, the Arabic word for “submission,” isn’t new. Satan has been corrupting men for a long time. His favorite strategy remains to present himself as God. It is the essence of the terrorist chant of “Allahu Akbar!” Allah is the Greatest!—or so the fallen angel wants fallen man to believe.

“And indeed, relationally (‘asher) the sons of God came to and pursued (bow’ – were included in association with) the daughters of man, and they bore children to them. These men (‘ish – male individuals) were renowned for (shem – named and famous for, earned a reputation for) magnifying themselves, going off to war, and behaving like arrogant tyrants (gibowr – acting like audacious and aggressive fighters as well as powerful despots) from the very beginning (‘olam – and for a very long time, everlasting).” (Genesis 6:4) In this passage, Yahweh has transitioned from calling men ‘adam to ‘ish because He is now viewing them differently.

In Genesis 10:8, we are told that the father of politicized religion, of human self-aggrandizement, Nimrod, was a gibowr, so it’s not a compliment. Arrogant, self-aggrandizing men have used a caustic blend of religion and politics to start wars and set themselves up as tyrannical despots for a very, very, long time. It is the hallmark of human behavior—the thing we are best known for. If I were asked to consolidate human history into a single word, it would be gibowr—the story of men magnifying themselves, going off to war, and behaving like arrogant tyrants.

“Yahuweh saw (ra’ah – viewed, recognized, and considered) that indeed (kiy – truly), the evil intent, wickedness, and depravity (ra’at – deprivation, distress, and misfortune) of mankind (‘adam) in the (ba ha) land (‘erets) was great in magnitude and quantity (rab – prolific and abundant). And his every (kol) inclination (yeser – motivation, desire, ambition, and creative idea) of his heart (leb) and thoughts (mahasabah – plans, plots, purposes, and schemes) were bad (ra’ – evil, wicked, immoral, repugnant, miserable, sad, troubled, and fiercely harmful) all (kol) the time (yowm – every day).” (Genesis 6:5) It only takes a spark to get a fire raging, and all too suddenly, every good thing is consumed in it. By this time, man had used his nesamah so poorly, creation had been for naught.

Naham, in the following verse, is one of those words which the context of the sentence is required to properly convey the meaning. It can depict “being consoled and encouraged after finding relief from sorrow and distress.” But, it can also infer “to reconsider, changing one’s opinion, leading to sorrow, to being sorry, to suffering grief and experiencing regret.” Based upon the situation which has developed, and upon the subsequent use of ‘atsab in the text, conveying, “pain and distress,” the meaning is clear. “Then Yahuweh truly (kiy) grieved, regretting (naham) that He had made (‘asah – fashioned and created) Adam (‘adam – mankind) along with the earth (‘erets). His heart (leb – inner person, source of life, and spirit) was emotionally distressed, filled with grief and sorrow (‘atsab – was hurt, pained, vexed, displeased, and tormented).” (Genesis 6:6)



If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline bitnet  
#56 Posted : Monday, March 23, 2009 10:38:37 PM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Shalom,

Baalism has reached far and wide through the many religions of this world with Islam leading the way. That said, in this season of Lent, I am reminded that Catholics also bow and kiss the feet of a statue on a crucifix. Such misplaced piousness and reverence should be corrected but few seem to want to learn and accept the Truth. The Second Commandment is completely misinterpreted and twisted to suit a warped theology bent of empowering clerics who want to dominate others. But the Muslims take it to new heights by facing a stone five times a day and blaspheme the Creator by praising another deity thereby breaking the First Commandment also! Sigh! Can't wait for the time when all this nonsense is removed and only Truth prevails.
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Yada  
#57 Posted : Thursday, April 2, 2009 11:47:58 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Initially, this exchange started between "D" and Ken but ends with "D" being referred to Yada.

Quote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "DR"
To: <email@TheOwnersManual.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 2:25 AM
Subject: Wonderful!

Someone at your House opened the Windows and the invigoratingly beautiful Fresh Air sailed out over land and sea and breezed it's way into the Open Door at my House. The visit is turning out to be quite wonderful as I am settling in to host my invited guest.... The Owners'Manual... please be seated.

Your expansive definitive presentation of Exodus Ch.20... beginning with G-d speaking and revealing THE WONDROUS MYSTERY OF WHO HE IS... IS BEYOND, BEYOND AND FURTHERMORE, BEYOND... ALL BEYONDS... all the way back to 'and His origins will be From Everlasting. I can hear Micah and Isaiah saying yes! yes! and I also say Yes, Yes!
Truly He Is The Word Alive, and Forever Is G-d, The Eternal King of Israel, and the World; The Self Existent One. Faith alone gives sight to the Doorway to His House; Trust is the bond forever.
Davida Geller Rosenberg .... thank you for what you have done.



Ken's response:
Quote:

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:25 AM, ken power wrote:

Hi, D:

You're quite welcome, and thank you in turn for your encouraging words. They are most timely.

ken


"DR" writes to Ken and forwards it to Yada:

Quote:


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:49 PM, "DR"> wrote:

Hi Yada,

I originally sent this letter to Ken. He explained that you are the writer of Yada Yah---and gave me your email address. My friend told me about this website and I'm really enjoying it. The first essay I read was on 'Bikkurim'.. First Fruits and it blessed me more than I can say. Truly G-d is beyond Words in spite of the fact that He Is The Word.

Would you mind reading my thoughts on the teaching that I'm discussing below? I want to bring out a thought to you that we Jewish Messianics hold onto with vigor.

Many thanks,

-DR


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "DR"
Date: Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: Wonderful!
To: ken power <email@futuretruth.net>

Hello again Ken,

May I have a word with you please?

I just completed listening to one of your tapes/online..
from Yada Yah--- and I have a comment to make.

I heard you explain about the Masorites who did not translate from the Hebrew correctly.. or willfully did not tell the actual truth... (I will have to listen to it again...) and you commented.. (was that you on the audio? there were two commentators speaking...)... and I heard a comment stating how sad.. that tens of millions of Jewish people had to die and go to hell??? OUCH because of this error of the Masorites.

I must respectfully disagree in earnest. Surely Hashem knew that all these abuses would occur; abuses, errors, willful as well as ignoranant, and as a result so many Hebrew children would not hear the truth about His Son Yeshua. Yeshua also said, that no one could come to Him..(be given understanding of who He is) UNLESS The Father draw him.

Furthermore, the promises of Hashem are Everlasting; and Israel has received them in full measure by virtue of The Word of G-d (Yeshua) given in our Covenants.

Yeshua is Israel's greatest Prize and Surprize!
Israel will see Him when He returns to the MOunt of Olives, and we will mourn for Him as one would mourn for an only son and be in bitterness for Him as for a Firstborn. At that time, HaShem opens a fountain for us of cleansing.. and so... all (true lovers of G-d) ISRAEL shall be saved.

Always remember Hebrews 11... that as far as the Gospel is concerned... Israel is your 'enemy' (translation??) but as far as Election is concerned.. 'THEY ARE LOVED, for the gifts and the calling of G-d, ARE IRREVOCABLE.'

Truly The G-d of Heaven and Earth will not be thwarted by the pen in the hand of the scribe forever.

His precious and life giving Word to Israel says that His love for us is Everlasting and He would provide a Redeemer to our children's childen, with Love.

I am a blessed Israelite because I have been permitted to see Who He Is, and that Yeshua is our Immanu-El, born to us! I am going to wait with great faith, for the rest of my brothers and sisters to mourn for Him as I have done and continue to do.

We will all rejoice before The Great King together and I count the days until all His prophecy is fulfilled to bless His creation.

I enjoy very much what you teach.

May I ask what your background is and your resources?
I so enjoy the details which you share and which give such illumination to His Glorious Word. Thank you so much for Yada Yah--h.

"DR"


Yada's response:

Quote:
D,

I am in the final stages of editing and rewriting Bikuwrym. I have attached the file which should be posted in a few days.

Yahuweh give us all freewill, and sadly most rabbis, including the Masoretes, used it poorly. Their deliberate copyedits of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms become evident when one studies the DSS. So, their corruption is a statement of fact, not an opinion of which you can reasonably disagree.

By using Yeshua, rather than Yahushua, by being unwilling to write Yahuweh's name, by using Hashem, and by writing G-d. you too have been victimized by erroneous rabbinical teachings.

I don't say that Jewish children are going to hell. No child goes to hell. The only souls destined for the Abyss are those who have led people away from Yahuweh. Most souls, including those of children, who do not know and who do not rely upon Yahuweh, are annihilated upon their death. They do not suffer eternal torment. You see, there are three eternal fates, not just two. But, by having corrupted Yahuweh's message, many who would have otherwise come to know Yahuweh, and spend eternity with Him in heaven, had the path home hidden from them.

Yahushua's mission was to fulfill the Called-Out Assemblies, and in so doing, to offer us a way home. His mission cannot be understood apart from the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. Therefore, it is essential to reveal what God actually said and to expose and condemn those who have altered the Word.

All of the resources I used are listed in the Prologue of the book. My favorite is Logos software.

Yada

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#58 Posted : Friday, April 3, 2009 5:40:49 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
From: MS
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 4:48 PM
To: email@ProphetofDoom.net
Subject: Doom Prophet

What "religious" background are you from? I see in your articles you use CE and BCE to identify timeframes. Those typically stand for Common Era and Before Common Era. Christians would use BC or AD to note timeframes. What is your agenda?

-MS


Our webmasters response:

Quote:
Yada and others who worked on Prophet of Doom adhere to no religion.
However, we are very dedicated to continuing to expand our relationship with Yahweh - much of which is through getting to know Him more and more by finding the brilliance in His Word / Scripture.

In regards to an agenda, I would say that the only agenda we have is to wake up people about how destructive religions are, and how much they are in direct conflict with what Yahweh has revealed to us.

And Yada could go into much more depth on BC and AD, but off the top of my head, some of the problems with them are:

- The year 1 "AD" would actually come at least 2 years after the birth of Yahshua.

- The term "Lord" / "Domini" is one which Yahweh deplores.
Yada covers this in depth throughout Yada Yahweh, but the bottom line is Yahweh wants to have a relationship with us and has bowed down and sacrificed Himself such that we may stand upright alongside Him. The last thing He wants is to be feared and/or considered as a master above us. And without getting off on too much of a tangent in this message, the use of the cross as a symbol, hides this standing upright with Him message, in addition to of course violating the "2nd Commandment."

- And if we had the ability to effectively communicate via a Yahweh-centric timeline, focusing on the "birth" of the Messiyah would be inconsistent with the message that Yahweh conveys through His Word.
The best standard would of course be to start the years at the beginning of the fall of Adam and Chawah from their time in Eden.
But knowing that the lack of recorded history would make that difficult to do, the next best option would be to start the timeline when our souls were ransomed when Yahshua's soul was separated from the Set-Apart Spirit and separated from Yahweh in Sheol after He was brutally murdered on the Upright Pole.
So, the best year-numbering system would have us currently at 5976 and the best alternative system would have us at year 1967.
(Either way we are almost 6,000 years past the beginning of the era of man, and about to start the 1,000 years of Yahshua and man together on Earth.)

You sound like someone who might appreciate Yada's other work at Yada Yahweh (http://YadaYahweh.com) much more than Prophet of Doom (http://ProphetofDoom.net)
Even if you initially have trouble with the conflicts we highlight between Christianity and what we highlight in God's Word, it should at least motivate you to look for credence in the traditions the manmade religious constructs beyond what those within those systems tell you to believe.

We would love to hear back from you after you read some of Yada Yahweh.

Thank you for sending us your inquiry (and the blessings for the rest of the day, especially since the Sabbath is about to begin in just a few minutes).

Sincerely,

The Prophet of Doom / Yada Yahweh Webmaster



If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline kp  
#59 Posted : Friday, April 3, 2009 5:51:07 PM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

Speaking for myself, I typically use BC and AD because I'm an old fart and I'm used to the terms. But they're technically incorrect. BCE and CE are better, but let's face it: the Gregorian calendar is all goofed up. Time on God's calendar (I call it Absolute Time) begins with the fall of Adam in the Garden, and ends with the conclusion of the Kindgom age precisely 7,000 years later. Dates before and after that span of time are of no consequence as far as our relationship with Yahweh is concerned.

kp
Offline Yada  
#60 Posted : Thursday, April 9, 2009 6:19:19 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:29 PM, `C` wrote:

All I can say is, Wow! I just found your website through The Religion of Peace site and I have been reading for hours now. I have known we were closing in tight on the "end times" for quite some time now, but I am/was still stuck on the, "Don't be a timesetter" mode. I am digesting still, the things you said about dates and times of the return of the Messiah. I also appreciate the time you spent as an atheist. You have a wider perspective. It's very obvious that you also have studied just a bit. (lol) I love your answers to the muslims. I have been paying a lot of attention to their insane beliefs lately. You are so right that if they realized what they believed in, there would be none of them. Satan surely is the author of Islam. I have been informing people I know who think it is basically a religion of peace and there are a few extremists making it sound bad, that it IS a religion/cult of pure hate and intolerance. It seems that anyone who thinks could understand this....if only they would burden themselves to actually read a little bit. I feel so bad for the people who are born into this fatal trap of Islam and just let themselves be spoon-fed with its lies and gross falsehoods. In my opinion, it's as if they were born of a certain color, and that is what they are until death. They have no choice in the matter. It's like I would say, I am a Californian, therefore, that is what I will always be. I cannot move to any other state. They are completely bound by it unless they are willing to face death.

A question I have for you is, is there any hope for a KJV bible reader? (smile) Do I need to learn Greek and Hebrew to understand the bible perfectly? What translation do you use, if you read an English bible? I am being serious.Thank you for this excellent site. I will be a regular visitor.

Godspeed,

-C


Yada`s response:

Quote:
C,

The answer to the "know one knows" excuse for not recognizing the dates which underlie Yahweh's plan can be found in the Taruw'ah and Kippurym chapters of Volume 2.

The problem isn't just that the KJV is a rotten translation, it's the religious mindset which goes with it that keeps most readers from finding the narrow, unpopular path to Yahweh. And while you don't need to speak or read Hebrew and Greek to understand God's Word, you have to be willing to invest the time to use the lexicons which are freely available to us.

Yes, it is sad that billions of Muslims are born into a satanic death cult, but the deceit born into Christianity is no less troubling.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline edStueart  
#61 Posted : Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:52:33 AM(UTC)
edStueart
Joined: 10/29/2008(UTC)
Posts: 370
Location: Philadelphia

"C" wrote (to Yada):
Quote:
I am a Californian, therefore, that is what I will always be. I cannot move to any other state.



We will pray for you, Brother. Perhaps someday you will be able to escape from behind "The Streisand Curtain"
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free."
But first, it will piss you off!
Offline Yada  
#62 Posted : Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:58:56 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

I attended a Torah class at the local synagogue a couple of weeks ago and got into a discussion with the Rabbi about the pronunciation and use of the Name. I forwarded her response to Yada.

Quote:
On Apr 10, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Yada wrote:

> Hello Sharon,
>
> I came across this material online and wanted to get your reaction
> to it. If I recall, during an earlier conversation, I believe you had said that the Name was/is unpronounceable/unknown able. If you have time, I’d like to get your reaction to it.
>
> The following material was taken from the, `Bikurym, First Fruits`
> chapter of `Yada Yahweh`:
> http://yadayahweh.com/Ya..._Assemblies_Bikurim.YHWH
>
> “God’s name is comprised of four commonly used Hebrew letters.
> (If you are reading this at YadaYahweh.com, you will find the Creator’s name
> written in the paleo-Hebrew alphabet in the header.) In the original script of revelation, the first letter in God’s name, a “Y,” was known as a yod. It was a vowel consonant similar to the “y” in English. The second letter, hay, depicted a soft “H,” and was
> pronounced “eh,” or “ah.” The initial letters YH in Yahuweh and Yahuwshua’, were therefore vocalized “Yah.” The “W,” or wah, found both in Yahuweh and Yahuwshua’ (יְהֹושֻׁעַ – written right to left in Babylonian Hebrew) designated the vowel “u” in paleo-Hebrew and represented the “oo” sound. Therefore, YHW is pronounced
> “Yahu” in both names, and it may be accurately transliterated “Yahu” or “Yahuw.” With the addition of a second “H,” God’s name becomes “Yahuweh” or “Yahuwah,” depending upon how the hay is vocalized. This means that God’s name can be transliterated Yahweh, Yahwah, Yahuweh, or Yahuwah, recognizing that the “w” is a vowel.”
>
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
>


This was the Rabbi`s response to me:

Quote:
-----Original Message-----
From: S
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:38 AM
To: `Yada`
Subject: Re: Pronunciation of The Name?

Dear `Yada,`

Regarding YHVH, I said that Jews do not pronounce the name as we are
not exactly sure how it is pronounced. Only the High Priest knew the
exact pronunciation and that was done when he was in the Holy of
Holies in the Temple. As the article below pointed out, there can be
many ways of pronouncing the name depending on how it is vowelized.
Everything is basically speculation. The Yud, Vav, and Heh, are
typically "vowel" letters in Hebrew. The nikudim (the dots below the
letters in Hebrew) that are found in our text signify the vowels in
the word "Adonai" and mean that we are to vocalize "Adonai" in place
of YHVH (In Hebrew this is the "k're" vs. the "k'tiv".) Similarly,
there are places in the Tanach where the word Adonai and YHVH are
next to each other. In that case, we say "Adonai Elohim" instead of
"Adonai Adonai" and you will see that the vowels under the YHVH are
different, and signify the vowels that are found in the world Elohim.
(See Gen. 16:2, Deut. 3:24, Deut. 9:26, e.g.) Yah (Yud and Heh) is
one of the names of God (did you know that there are over 100
different names of God in the Jewish tradition?) and comes from the
first two letters of the Tetragrammaton. Many biblical names
incorporate parts of the YHVH. Eliyahu (Elijah) is one for example.
There is no "w" sound in Hebrew phonemes. A Vav can either be a "v"
sound, an oo sound or an "oh" sound.

I hope this helps,

Sincerely,

-SB


After forwarding a copy to Yada, this was his response:

Quote:
There is nothing new, accurate, or even useful in the rabbi's reply. The three letters which comprise Yahuweh's name are vowels, making it especially easy to pronounce.

If it were true that "Yahuweh" can't be pronounced, with three of the five Hebrew vowels, then sixty percent of the Hebrew language would remain un-pronounceable. But rabbis don't make the "we don't know how to pronounce it" claim with any of the other words, titles, or names in the Tanack.

The oldest extant Old Covenant text with vowel pointing is from the 11th century and didn't become public until the 18th century. Yet, no one made the claim that nothing in the text could be pronounced from 1400 BCE to 1700 CE. It is only of Yahuweh's name that they now make this assertion as if it were comprised of letters from a different alphabet. How is it that we can pronounce Yahushua, Yahuwdah, Yahudym, Yashayahu, Yirmeyahu, and Zekaryah, or chay and hayah, if we cannot pronounce Yahuweh? The answer is: we have to be ignorant and irrational to ascribe to the rabbinical justification.

The simple and clear truth is: rabbis craved Yahuweh's authority, so they removed His name from His Scripture. Then, they made it a crime, punishable by death to say God's name. They even created their own replacement text, the Oral Law, and the Talmud, to validate their disingenuous grab for power.

Dishonest as their roots, they now lie, claiming that they have "too much respect for the name to say it." And yet, Yahuweh says that there will be severe repercussions for those who diminish the use and significance of His name--putting the Jewish religion in direct conflict with the Author of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. A religion which contradicts the texts from which it claims its authority is irrefutably false and unreliable.

As for 'adonay being added by rabbis, that copyedit of God's Word, meaning "lord," is equivalent to ba'al--Satan's title and most popular moniker. And that is why adonay serves as the basis for Adonis. If Yahuweh wanted to be known as "lord," He would have used that title instead of His name the 7000 time YHWH appears in Scripture. And He would not have said that He hates being called "Lord," as He does in Hosea.

Man was not authorized to change God's Word. It is obvious to anyone familiar with Yahuweh, and with the whole tapestry of Scripture, that 'edon, the Upright One, and the Pillar of the Tabernacle, was the title Yahuweh chose for Himself in conjunction with His name. And even then, it is used sparingly, just enough to make the connection between the Pillar of the Exodus and the Upright Pole of Passover's fulfillment. It is about Yahuweh standing up for us so that we could stand with Him.

Yahuweh has but one name according to His revelation. He has many titles. So, once again, the rabbinical claim is contrary to God's testimony. Like most everything these rabbis claim, it's arrogant to the extreme to contradict God and then claim to be right. And I suppose that is why these self promoting types chose a Hebrew word which means "exalted" as their title. It tells you all you need to know about why they aren't bashful when it comes to contradicting God.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#63 Posted : Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:18:01 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The subject line of this e-mail read: "888"


Quote:
2009/4/16 'EW'

Dear Sir/ Lady

How much do you know about the factual knowledge about the various bible/scripture translations?

Without the real evidence we can only speculate to the "possibilities" that translations might have been changed for the various apparent reasons. but with maths no one can disagree as it is the true essence of values that no one can argue anout.

The numerical figures/values in the Word according to original Greek translations is a very clear indication of His Divine existence and if one start to investigate this route one is sure to find that the Word as it is available today (even though you suggest differently for your own purposes) is Alive and able to save any who would call upon His name.

Whether it is Jesus (which in Greek Ιησους ) sums to 888 = 8.3.37 (which implies new beginning with the Divine God)

Jesus Christ ( Ιησους Χριστός) sums to 2368 =8square.37)
Word Logos ( λογος ) sums to 373 and in palindromic form of the digits 3 and 7 that consist of both the mark of the Divine Head 37 and 73.
Gen1.1The first verse of the bible sums to the figure 2701 and is using all four numbers 3,7,37 and 73 factorized in the form of a palindrome.

As you see, you can not only rely on the assumptions that your translation knowledge is sufficient to tell people that their salvation is only worth something in the way you have gathered it from the language knowledge. Our Father the great "I AM" the One who we requests YADA from so that His Holy Spirit can reveal His truths to us.

Ivan Panin was fortunate, he was a clever mathematician but did not have the HS to convict him of sin, righteousness and judgment but his understanding of figures (as God planned it) lead him to become a believer. He was not judged by the cleverness of man but by the Holy Spirit as he caught understanding of the divinely inspired Word.

I think you miss the real mission of the Father as described in John 21/11. Here the figure 153 (total amount of fishes caught in a full and ready net according to the instructions from the Messiah (Jesus himself) lead to the salvation of " His harvest". The number 153 is an equilateral triangular (take the figure 10 indication of the old 10 commandments and the figure 7 as frequently found in Revelation as the figure of the new dispensation and add them together = 17 which would give you 153 if you add the 17+16 +15 all the way down to 1) It depicts the facts as mentioned in Titus 2/14 that we are a peculiar people (the Body of Christ or Sons of God , Beni-Ha-Elohim 40, 10,5,30,1,5,10,50,2 = 153) as also found in Romans 8/17 "joint heirs" 1071 or 7 x153. So we can continue on and on and on.

Please redifine your statements and narrow minded views and judgmental views about the greatness of God. He is infinitely able and willing to save whoever He wants. He had other fish on the fire when he instructed His followers to catch where He told them! (John 10/16)

Shalom
-E


Yada's response:

Quote:
If you have any desire to actually know what Yahweh revealed, if you have any desire to understand what He said, abandon the satanic numerology rubbish based upon errant man made names and read Yada Yahweh. If not, go to Vegas, your odds of getting to know God there would be better.

Yada

As a word of advice, the consequence of being wrong about what Yahweh revealed is simply the death and destruction of your soul, but when you start to preach and promote that which is not true, and thereby lead others away from God, the penalty is the Abyss. Be careful.
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Theophilus  
#64 Posted : Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:44:48 PM(UTC)
Theophilus
Joined: 7/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 527
Man

Thanks: 3 times
edStueart wrote:
"C" wrote (to Yada):


We will pray for you, Brother. Perhaps someday you will be able to escape from behind "The Streisand Curtain"


LOL, Ed that reminded me of my friends in Wisconsin trapped behind the "Cheddar Curtain"
Offline Yada  
#65 Posted : Friday, April 17, 2009 6:58:47 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:42 AM, "MB" wrote:

Hi Yada

When you get a moment could you share your opinion with me, concerning the speaking in tongues.

I would value your insight.

Just a sentence or two would suffice, your time permitting.


Thank you

MB


Yada's response:

Quote:
MB,

According to the most important passage on the subject, the fulfillment of Seven Sevens, speaking in tongues and interpreting them is talking, writing, and translating the languages people speak around the world so as to share Yah's message. The only exception is in the preposition "if I could speak in the tongues of spiritual messengers..." but then, like moving mountains, it is only something we have the potential to do, but do not actually do--at least in our mortal existence. Moreover, there is no reason to think that there is an atmosphere like earth in heaven, facilitating soundwaves, or that soundwaves are the medium of personal communication between spiritual beings. I expect better. Further, I expect that the language of heaven will be related to paleo-Hebrew.

So, in my opinion, the Pentecostal thing is all pretense.

Yada


The discussion continues (Yada's comments/ANS are in blue):

Quote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, "MB" wrote:

It's M 3.8-10. You'll notice that it is food, not money, and that is the food which is due the Levites as part of their role with the Miqra'ey (see verse 7 for context). The Levites were not given any land so supplimental food from Temple sacrifices was ordained. Some parts of the Passover lambs, for example, were eaten by the Levites. Since there aren't any Levites or Temple sacrifices, this tithe is no longer in effect. There is no OC statute about paying money or to paying religious clerics.

My apologies for sending you the wrong text. Excellent explanation of Malachi 3:8-10, greatly appreciated.

Finally regarding this subject, may I tax your patience one last time Sir:

How do you read Luke 21:1-4
I understand the environment to be found in Luke 20:1 (for the above text)
Luke 21:4 states cast in unto the offerings (KJV)

ANS: First, consider the context of Luke 20.22-25 as it relates to money. Second, consider 20.46-7 as it relates to supporting religious clerics. Third, for all we know, the rich were providing gifts of food, which is appropriate. There was no mention of tithe in the story and the gift offering was unspecified and generic. Fourth, the religion of the day was rabbinical Judaism, which is why He didn't praise the rich for their giving--if it was indeed a religious contribution.

The poor woman gave money because she was too poor to provide a lamb. And to give in her state shows that she trusted God to help her. This is a fine example for us to follow. But most importantly, she gave "all she had to live on," which is the example Yahushua Himself set, giving His all for us. And that is why the next thing out of His mouth was a discussion of the temple being destroyed. He was speaking of Himself and the building. And while He ransomed us, paying the price to redeem us, it was never about money.


The moral of the story is that it is better to dedicate your life, trusting Yah, in the service of others than it is to fill the collection plate or warehouse.

Your findings with respect to Matthew 19:16-21 (especially verse 21)

ANS:

The man wanted to do things to save himself, as rich, self-reliant people are wont to do. That is impossible. And that is why the passage ends with the 26th verse, in which God makes salvation possible. The moral of the story is in the 29th and 30th verses, where being adopted by God, and being part of His family, is what we should seek. It also speaks of the 5th commandment in terms of who the father and mother is which were should consider worthy.


With respect to your extensive repertoire of Scripture, how should modern day churches pay for their places of worship and utility bills?

ANS:

They should shut their doors, fire their employeess, and sell their land and buildings. Then, they should stop lying, come to know the truth, and then tell it.


Thank you YAHUWEH, for giving Yada the patience, time and knowledge to help me gain a deeper understanding of your WORD and fortify my relationship with You Dad.

-MB





Edited by user Sunday, April 19, 2009 1:18:55 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#66 Posted : Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:57:53 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

The conversation continues between "CJT" and Yada:

Quote:
Yahweh vs. Christianity‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:30:31 AM
To: "Cantor JT"

CJT 2: Dear Mr. Yada,

I was pleased to receive such a lengthy and passionate response from you. Though we may disagree, your words have opened my eyes to the self-deception people play upon themselves. I don’t consider you a bad person or intentionally deceptive; I believe there may be many false notions accepted in place of truth. I wish to reply to many of your words. I hope we can be men of sincere heart.


Yada 2: Dear Cantor JT,

It is astonishing how corrosive religion is, and what it does to a person’s ability to think. Faced with proof that the religion of Christianity is false, and most especially Catholicism, you see me as being deceived as opposed to yourself. Worse, in an exchange of information, you thought it was somehow relevant to express your views of my personal morality.

Most of the tens of thousands of letters I have received at Prophet of Doom are from religious people, usually Muslims. While I respond to most of them, I have noticed a trend. No amount of evidence or reason is sufficient to persuade someone who is an advocate for their faith. Their beliefs are more important to them than facts or logic. They justify or ignore anything which discredits their religion, no matter how valid, and stoop to demeaning the messenger instead.

Of the thousands of emails I’ve received at Yada Yahweh, the preponderance have been former Catholics. They are 99.9% positive, appreciative of having the evidence brought together for them from Yahweh’s Scripture to affirm what they had already come to realize. The difference between them and you, is that their minds are open, and they are hungry for the truth. It is why Yahweh tells us that before anyone is capable of assimilating and understanding who He is and what He has done, they must first be willing to change their attitude and way of thinking. Religious advocates are the furthest from this mindset, and thus are the furthest from the truth.

In other words, there is nothing I can do for you, there are no answers or information which I can provide, which will help you find your way out of Byzantine Catholicism and into a relationship with God until you change your attitude and way of thinking. And that is why I didn’t write my response to you, but instead used your email to reach others who were less deceived and more willing to learn.

Yahweh has given me two missions, Cantor, the first was to expose and condemn Islam so that Muslims would be without excuse. The product of that endeavor is Prophet of Doom—a one thousand page presentation of Islam’s five oldest sources. The second was to expose what He actually said, so that Christians and Jews would be without excuse. This has produced Yada Yahweh—a two thousand page analysis of prophetic Scripture from the oldest Hebrew and Greek manuscripts.

Recognizing that no one can help you in your present mindset, and since the second mission is not yet complete, that is where I am going to spend my time. If you have a “sincere heart” for Yahweh, and if you are willing to accept the truth in spite of the fact that it will destroy your religion, then I invite you to read www.YadaYahweh.com. If you do, write me again, and we’ll exchange thoughts on what Yahweh revealed.


Yada: Considering Catholicism’s recent accommodation of Islam, I am surprised, albeit pleased, that you are reading Prophet of Doom—Islam’s Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad’s Own Words.

CJT 2: You don’t specifically state the recent accommodation of Islam you are alleging that Catholicism has made. The only thing that comes to mind is the late Pope John Paul’s kissing of the Koran. Believe me, kissing something doesn’t necessarily mean one believes in the contents. The Popes also have a tradition of kissing the ground when arriving in a new country for a visit. Does this mean the Pope accepts the Islamic government of that country too? Our Lord ate and drank with tax collectors and prostitutes. The first step to bringing the pagan and/or Islamic infidels to Christ is respect. Man (and woman) is made in God’s image (icon). This image, not the likeness (if there is any) is why the human person, no matter what religious persuasion, is to be respected. But is there is another “accommodation” you had in mind, please state it. I am Byzantine Catholic, not Roman Catholic, and we have a calendar of martyrs that we remember
every day who died for the faith either by the pagan Roman government or Islam.


Yada 2: One cannot excuse the head of a religion, like Pope John Paul II, bowing to and kissing a Qur’an publicly, acknowledging his respect for it in front of cameras, when it was authored by Satan and hold a billion souls hostage. One cannot excuse item #841 of the Catechism, which says: “The Church’s relationship with Muslims: The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place amongst whom are the Muslims. They profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day.” Such ignorance is appalling.

By comparing these things to Yahushua telling the truth to prostitutes and tax collectors, you have revealed a lack of judgment, and have justified an abomination. In God’s eyes, this makes you better than the pope, who committed the act, but not much.

According to Yahushua’s example, and Yahweh’s Word, showing “respect” for a pagan’s thoughts, books, culture, customs, holidays, traditions, leaders, and religion is the absolute wrong thing to do. (Read the Emmaus discussion in the Bikuwrym – FirstFruits chapter of YY for proof of this: http://yadayahweh.com/Ya..._Assemblies_Bikurim.YHWH ) So, if God is right, you and the Church are wrong. According to God, the way to respect someone is to show them that their religion is unreliable, and then, if they are open to it, share the truth with them. And even then, He only gave His audience one opportunity to reject His message—which is more than I have given you.

It makes no difference to Yahweh or to me if you are a Roman Catholic, Byzantine Catholic, Russian or Greek Orthodox Christian, Muslim, Mormon, Copt, Protestant, Buddhist, Hindu, Communist, Secular Humanist, agnostic or atheist. The fact that they are wrong for different reasons, doesn’t make any of them right. Based upon God’s Word, those who died for any of these religions are either dead, their souls now destroyed, or they are incarcerated, awaiting judgment for have advocated on behalf of religions which lead people away from Yahweh. While that isn’t what you wanted to hear, or even what you are capable of accepting at this time, it is Yahweh’s clearly-stated position on the matter.


Yada: ...your response provides me with the opportunity to help others find their way out of the Babylonian inspired religion of Catholicism. So it is in this light that I will respond to your false allegations.

CJT 2: The first converts were Jews, not Babylonians. Jesus was a Jew. His mother, Mary, was a Jew. The Apostles were Jews. The Holy Scriptures they read and proclaimed in their synagogues were the Hebrew Scriptures. The Hebrew Scriptures is quoted extensively throughout the New Testament, not Babylonian pagan worship.

Yada 2: Your response is completely unrelated to my statement, and it is very misleading. It is as if you don’t know the difference between religion and race, country and people. It is hard for me to fathom how you could miss the fact that the religion of Catholicism was inspired by the Babylonian religion considering that you were writing a response to: “While we stand upon the shoulders of the Babylonian, Assyrian, and Sumerian scholars, we are haunted by their faith. Two politically-minded doctrines grew out of its schemes - Medieval Catholicism and fundamental Islam. For a thousand years the most powerful forces were not nations but religions. Both deployed rites first practiced in Babylonian temples. Many Catholic symbols, festivals, and doctrines are rooted in the practices of these distant peoples. Christmas, Easter, Lent, the priesthood, confession, and the worship of the Virgin Mary are examples of present rites borrowed from a pagan past.” (cf. page 89)


Beyond the fact that the race of the first to follow Yahushua was irrelevant to this point, Yahweh does not use the term “convert,” because it conveys many errant religious ideas. Instead, He says that people who come to Him, change their attitude and way of thinking first, and then come to know, trust, rely upon, and revere His Words and Way.

More importantly, Jews did not convert to Christianity, as is your inference; but instead, the first Followers of the Way were Yahuwdym, meaning “Related to Yah.” There is no basis for “Jesus.” The Savior’s name is Yahushua, meaning Yah Saves. Yahushua is a Yahuwdym but that is irrelevant to the origins of Catholicism in any of its forms.

The idea you are missing is that the Hebrew Scriptures stand in opposition to the religion of Christianity, especially Catholicism. Yahweh’s message and plan of salvation has so little in common with Catholicism, it would be fair to say that they are unrelated. And the Renewed Covenant Scriptures, affirm the Old Covenant. As such, they too are opposed to the religion of Byzantine Catholicism—just as they are opposed to Roman Catholicism.

The religion of Catholicism in all of its flavors, its festivals, rituals, clergy, sacraments, symbols, and teachings have their roots in Babylonian sun god worship. All Constantine did, was change the names—and even then, not all of them (such as Lent, Easter, and Sunday). I not only proved this to you in my reply, I gave you two sources to read to learn more.


Yada: The last thing Yahushua asks us to do at the end of the age is to “come out of her (the Whore of Babylon) My people.”

CJT 2: What is this Whore of Babylon?

Yada 2: It is embarrassing that you would write an author of a thousand page book on Islam, critical of a Babylonian reference to Catholicism, and yet not know who the “Whore of Babylon” is. And therein lies your issue. You don’t know what Yahweh said. If you are not informed on a subject, don’t write an author on that subject and call his accusations false.

The Whore of Babylon is religion, it is the full ensemble of Satan’s schemes to oppress and suppress humankind. Most specifically, it is Catholicism, although it is not limited to it, as it has the most in common with the Babylonian sun god religion of old. It is what Yahweh wants us to leave before we come to Him.


Yada: And yet, thanks to the religion of Catholicism, and the Church’s influence on Orthodox and Protestant Christianity, the preponderance of Christians remain mired in Mystery Babylon to this day.

CJT 2: Don’t tell the Orthodox that they are influenced by Catholicism. Orthodoxy rejects the Catholic Church. Protestant Christianty and all its Western Christianities are from the Latin Church. Are you married? If so, what side of the aisle did you wife stand on when you got married? Ever wonder why women always stand on the left side and men on the right? Do you think it might have been a pagan thing?

Yada 2: The differences you think are so meaningful between Roman Catholicism and Byzantine Catholicism are irrelevant to Yahweh. The differences you should be considering are those which exist between Yahweh’s instructions and those proclaimed by your Church. Moreover, to the point of this discussion, it is the similarity between Constantine’s religion, the Babylonian religion, and the Byzantine Catholic religion, which should haunt your soul.

Yada: While treating men as if they were representing God is wrong, it would be absurd to credit Islam or Catholicism with being popular movements which are opposed to exalting humans—if indeed that were your point. Both religions are “politically-minded doctrines” and they both honor emperors, albeit by different names.

CJT 2: Jesus, our Lord, did not come to overthrow a politik. He even told us to pay our taxes; I guess that makes us patriotic. I cannot fathom the notion that Catholicism or Eastern Christianity is politically-minded, especially when the blood of martyrs have painted the halls of Church history. My bishops in Eastern Slovakia refused to merge with the Russian Orthodox Church after WWII because the Communist government co-opted/infiltrated the Russian Church (to the detriment of thousands of martyrs being killed or exiled to Siberia). All my bishops were either killed or exiled for not giving in to the powers of the atheistic State. Your generalization, nay, stereotype overlooks these factoids of history.


Yada 2: Catholicism’s history of being political is legendary, and the results are horrid. It has a long tradition of exalting humans—especially popes, cardinals, bishops, and kings. My statement was accurate.

As for yours, Yahweh hates the title “Lord.” It is Satan’s title as it describes his ambition. It is based upon ba’al and adonay, and as such, it has become the name of pagan sun gods.

The Savior’s name is not “Jesus.” If you don’t know God’s name and title, you don’t know Him. There is nothing more basic.

Yahushua came to fulfill the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. His arrival had nothing to do with politics, making your point irrelevant. Yahweh, however, asks us repeatedly to come out of Babylon, which is politicized religion.

Yahushua said “give Caesar what is his,” not “pay your taxes.”

According to Scripture, God has no sympathy for, no interest in, and no relationship with, those who suffer or die fighting for their religion. He has called us to expose and condemn that which leads away from God, and to proclaim His Word in His name. The Byzantine martyrs did neither.


Yada: Constantine, the father of what has become Roman Catholicism, was both emperor and general and also, head of the church. He made it illegal, with the punishment being death, for anyone who observed Yahweh’s instructions in the Torah—including observing the Sabbath, Passover, Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Seven Sevens, Trumpets, Reconciliations, and Shelters. And that was a far greater crime than burning incense to an emperor.


CJT 2: I take it that you are either Jewish or a Jew for Christ. First, Constantine is not considered the “Father” of Roman Catholicism. Constantine wasn’t even baptized until he was on his death bed. The Nicene Creed, which was hammered out under his sponsorship, was a product of bishops, not politicians. Constantine was concerned about unity and preservation, which most of our politicians want: just so its their idea of unity. The bishops who gathered at Nicaea bore the scars of torture and suffering. The sight was recorded how miserable they looked. The challenge to them and to Christianity was Arius. The problem was the confusion between soteriology and ontology in the nature of God. No Babylonians were invited. In fact, many of Constantine’s sons became enemies of the Church.


Yada 2: Who I am is irrelevant. And, you would be wrong on both assumptions.

It is obvious to anyone who studies Constantine’s words and deeds in light of the Scriptures, and with an awareness of religious history, that he was the father of the Catholic religion—one which he modeled after Mithraism, which was a derivative of the Babylonian sun god religion. The timing of his “baptism” may be relevant to you, but it is irrelevant to God.

The Nicene Creed is worthless in Yahweh’s eyes. His Word is all that counts. For the most part, Bishops are the most political of religious people. And, once again, you remain oblivious to the differences between religion and race.

What you have missed here, and left without comment, drives to the heart of the issue.
“He made it illegal, with the punishment being death, for anyone who observed Yahweh’s instructions in the Torah—including observing the Sabbath, Passover, Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Seven Sevens, Trumpets, Reconciliations, and Shelters. And that was a far greater crime than burning incense to an emperor.”

Yada: As for the emperor, “Pontifex Maximus,” meaning “highest priest” in Etruscan, from which “pope” is derived, ...


CJT 2: “Pope” is derived from “papa” or our English “Father”. It is used in numerous churches for the chief clergy, not just Rome.

Yada 2: My point is historically accurate and yours is just a curiosity. Caesar, as the Pontifex Maximus, was considered to be the Highest Father in his pagan religious and political realm which is why there is a similarity in the words.

Yada 2: That doesn’t change the validity of the point, which was yet another bit of evidence to affirm that the POD conclusion was accurate.

Yada: The union of church and state, and between cleric and king, was how Roman Catholicism controlled Europe for centuries.


CJT 2: Funny, but many Byzantine Emperors were excommunicated for not upholding Christian principles. St. John Chrysostom was exiled several times for pointing his finger at the Emperor, especially at the “Cow of Bashan” Empress. The late Pope John Paul II pointed his finger at a number of “Catholic” leaders throughout the world too. Many of the controversies throughout history of European Christianity was the meddling of the State in the Churches. Today, in the Republic of Slovakia, the salaries of clergy is paid by the government not because of any “union” between church and state, but because if the government stopped paying the salaries, the churches would demand all their confiscated properties back since WWII and the destruction of Communism. The State economy would collapse after such a loss.

Yada 2: While your point is interesting, it does not invalidate my statement.

Yada: The reason that Feudal and Medieval Europe was such a horrid, virtually enslaved, ignorant and oppressive realm for the common people, was because of Roman Catholicism.

CJT 2: Shall we ignore the rise of the universities? Many of the rights in our Western legal tradition actually came from the Inquisition, not necessarily the Spanish one. Take a look at how a traditional American (U.S.) courtroom is set up. It mimics a Latin Church. Judge’s seat (bishop’s throne/ex-cathedra), judge’s desk (altar), jury seats (clergy/elders synthronon), railing between judge and people (communion railing/chancel), standing when judge enters the courtroom (standing when the bishop enters to begin the liturgy/Mass) ...


Yada 2: So, your point is that they weren’t 100% evil. In the midst of treating the masses as if they were the property of cleric and king, they educated the privileged and provided those they didn’t fear with some legal rights.

And lest I forget, you are so focused on minutia; you are missing the only issues which really matter: the disunion between Yahweh’s Word and Christianity and the similarities between Christianity and the Babylonian sun god religion.


Yada: To say that the Catholic Church should be credited for making it “unified and stable” is to infer that Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia, and Mao’s China were the beneficiaries of their totalitarian systems because they made them “unified and stable.” Egypt was unified and stable when Yahweh freed His people from their oppressive political, religious, and economic schemes.


CJT 2: I am amazed how you can make one massive generalization and fallacy such as this. In all situations where there is a power vacuum, someone or some institution aids in establishing unity. Did I state that all answers to power vacuums were good? Our financial markets don’t like ANY hint of instability at all. If it senses stability, ANY stability, whether that stability is good or bad for the country, it calms down and goes up.

Yada 2: Your point was: “In some regions and throughout history, the political system fell apart (Feudal or Medieval Europe?) and the Church was the only “system” offering unity and stability.”

My point was, that “unity and stability” are often bad, as they lead to the kind of oppressive conditions found under Catholicism in Medieval Europe and under the other regimes listed. These comparisons and criticisms are valid.

Yada: Throughout human history, the most exacting, longest lived, and most egregious examples of this are Roman Catholicism and Islam. No other religion or institution even comes close. So, if your excuse is that Catholicism and Islam are not alone with regard to “opportunistically using their system to their advantage while portraying themselves as God’s servants,” it is a pathetically weak argument. And it is an admission of failure with regard to your rebuttal.


CJT 2: I am Byzantine Catholic, having received Christianity from the sons and daughters of the East, not Rome. I know that “Roman” Catholicism is the ONLY Catholicism you may know. That can be easily understood since many in the West our limited in their understanding and knowledge of Church history, often lumping everything wrong about Christians and Christianity under the umbrella “Roman” Catholicism.


Yada 2: Once again, I don’t care what religion you subscribe to. You wrote me saying that a paragraph in POD was a “false accusation.” Since it references “Catholicism,” it’s appropriate for me to reference Catholicism. Further, at this point you haven’t demonstrated that Byzantine Catholicism is materially different than Roman Catholicism as it relates to its opposition to Scriptural instructions or as it relates to its differentiation from the Babylonian religion.

While I don’t claim to be an expert on all forms and flavors of Christianity, I have traveled in 150 nations around the world and am more experienced and better educated than most in this regard. That aside, what I know is what Yahweh said. What I know, is that your letter reveals an affinity for Christian teachings which are in conflict with what Yahweh said. If these topics aren’t of interest to you, you shouldn’t have written me once, much less twice.


Yada: In Nazi Germany, some priests were killed for opposing Hitler, but very few by comparison to Protestant preachers. Moreover, the Church in Rome accommodated Hitler, as they did the Ustashi Fascists who murdered 800,000 Serbian Christians with priestly assistance during WWII.

CJT 2: The Pope accommodated Hitler. Hmmmmm. Everytime the Pope spoke out, and he did, the Nazis killed more people. So, Mr. Winn, what should he have done? The same situation is going on in Muslim countries where Christians are still allowed to worship. What do you think would happen if the Pope openly protested and campaigned against the atrocities that the Muslims levy against Christians? You should know the answer to that since you wrote a magnificent book, “Prophet of Doom”. Doom is the answer. It would be for the Middle Eastern Christians as it was for Europeans under the Nazi regime. Our bishop, Andrew Shepttisky of Western Ukraine was responsible for smuggling many Jews out from Europe during those dark days of the Holocaust. He also ordered his priests to help Jews escape death. Those clergy who refused to cooperate were excommunicated. A garden is in Jerusalem in his honor. Don’t underestimate the suffering and help many
Catholics gave to the Jews or others. Both the late Pope John Paul II and the current Pope Benedict knew intimately the evil in both Communism (for the former) and Nazism (for the latter).


Yada 2: I can’t wait to hear that argument in front of Yahweh at the pope’s trial. “I accommodated evil in the name of God to keep evil religious people from killing even more people.” Even if it were true, this response is the antithesis of Yahweh’s instructions.

I have written what I would have done as it relates to Nazi Germany and the rise of Fundamentalist Islam in Prophet of Doom, Tea With Terrorists, and Yada Yahweh, so as a critic of what I wrote regarding Catholicism, you should already know. There is a solution for evil. But since most are ignorant of Yahweh’s instructions, we won’t deploy the remedy, and as a result, the world as we know it is in fact “doomed.” The only hope is for individual souls, which is why I write.

A few good people, even many good people, doing good things does not make a religion good.


Yada: Catholicism played an insignificant role in the takeover of Communist Russia. And while there was some struggle waged by the Russian Orthodox Church, for the most part they capitulated to survive.

CJT 2: “Capitulated to survive”? Not really. My Byzantine Catholic Church was liquidated; made illegal by the Communists. Our church members were forced to join other churches because our church leaders refused to cooperate with the godless regime. The Catholic Church was always a thorn in the side of the godless regimes of Communism, Fascism, and Naziism.

Yada 2: “They” is in the sentence with “Russian Orthodox.” Please read what I’ve written before you respond.

Yada: ... challenging… Right Wing Christian Political PACs.”

CJT 2: Most, if not all, right wing Christian political PACs are not Catholic. They have a certain idea about the role of Israel. They are the new Constantinian Christians.

Yada 2: This is a waste of time. You seem unable to read what I’ve written. I wrote: “The preponderance of Liberation Theologians are Roman Catholics. [Please note the period.] And you could count on one hand (and not use any fingers) the number of Catholic “bishops who were exiled and/or killed point blank for challenging… Right Wing Christian Political PACs.” I did not call RWCPACs, “Catholic,” but was instead demonstrating that your claim was errant.

RWCPACs are mostly Evangelical, not Constantinian Christian. While they are wrong about many things, their ideas on the role of Israel is reasonably consistent with Scripture. It would be more accurate to call them “Laodiceans,” in harmony with Yahushua’s prophetic letter.


Yada: This is an embarrassingly poor rebuttal, Cantor. Isolated examples of some people acting appropriately, doesn’t provide any proof that an institution is essentially good.

CJT 2: This is an embarrassingly poor rebuttal, Mr. Winn. Isolated examples of some people acting inappropriately, doesn’t provide any proof that an institution is essentially bad.

Yada 2: You have consistently tried to make your point based upon some people doing good things and I’ve never advanced an argument that a dogma is evil based upon the bad behavior of a few people—unless those people are the religion’s leaders or founders—where it is appropriate. Christianity is bad because its teachings conflict with Yahweh’s instructions, not because of an abortion clinic bomber. Islam is bad because its founder and his words and deeds were rotten to the core, not because some Muslims attacked Constantinople. Nazism is bad based upon the words and deeds of its founder and his texts. The same is true with Socialist Secular Humanism.


Yada: And the “we were just one of many evil institutions claiming God’s authority,” is hardly a defense, ...

CJT 2: ???

Yada 2: In opposition to my statement regarding the marriage of politics and religion haunting us, especially in connection with the Babylonian religious influence on Catholicism, you wrote: “Politicians in all centuries, including the United States, have attempted to coop religion, especially those of the majority for political gain. Unfortunately, there are always opportunists who will use ANY system to their own advantage often portraying themselves as God’s servants.” In this context, my reply is appropriate. A listing of other organizations acting poorly, does not exonerate anyone.

Yada: More telling still, each of your arguments thus far come directly out of the Muslim playbook and read like the thousands of letters we have received from Islamic apologists.

CJT 2: Playbook arguments? Not really, sir. But propagating fallacies that can only come from the likes of Chic Publications is telling too.

Yada 2: Read the Forum at Prophet of Doom. Your arguments are remarkably similar to theirs. The bottom line here is that you are far too lost to be helped, much less saved from your religion. All I can hope for is that someone else benefits from this exchange.

Yada: ... read The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop.

JT: Thank you. I know where you are coming from. Your defense of Hislop is definitely telling. Conspiracy theories are always fun. In fact, I have been researching for a novel that involves such theories. People love conspiracies to help them explain what they don’t know just as much as pagans loved to create gods and goddesses to help them explain the mysteries of life too.

Yada 2: There is no “conspiracy theory” of any kind in Hislop’s The Two Babylons—just evidence and informed conclusions. So here is some unsolicited advice, next time, before you write, read.

Yada: The “Catholic Mass” featuring its round cakes of bread, was first practiced in Babylon and Assyria, where a divine liturgy was offered to the Queen of Heaven and Mother of God. There is no Scriptural justification for it because there is no correlation between the Miqra’ of Matsah and the Catholic Mass. This is called an “abomination to Yahuweh” in Jeremiah 44.

CJT 2: The Last Supper was more likely a friendship meal shared amongst members of a common guildlike organization. No one really knows what the Last Supper was. The Divine Liturgy is a anamnesis-memorial meal; a participative remembrance, not a mere symbolic dinner.

Yada 2: Wow, you are indeed indoctrinated. Yahushua told us in words as clear as they could be spoken, that the dinner was “Passover.” The memorial was of Passover. The remembrance was Passover. The symbolism was Passover. The “Last Supper,” on the other hand, is a religious myth designed to cause people to believe as you do.

Yada: As it relates to “readings and teachings of the holy Scriptures,” for centuries the Catholic clergy insisted in delivering them in Latin, a language not one person in a thousand understood.

CJT 2: How about Old Slavonic or Greek or Aramaic or Arabic ...?

[color=red]Yada 2: My point is accurate as it relates to what 99% of the world considers “Catholic” as opposed to Eastern Orthodox, for example. Until the Reformation, the RCC hunted down and killed anyone who dared provide Scripture in a language the people understood.

There are 70 extant first-, second-, and third-century MSS of the RC in Greek. They form the basis of the RC translations and commentary in Yada Yahweh. While they materially differ from the post-Constantine texts, until recently, the Roman Catholic Church has insisted on Latin, avoiding Greek, Hebrew, or any common tongue in Europe.

There is evidence of an extant Aramaic Text dating to the sixth century, and while that would have been helpful for the Aramaic-speaking population at that time, it isn’t as reliable as the earlier Greek MSS.

I am unaware of any evidence of an early extant Arabic text. The research I did on this shows them to be much...
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Theophilus  
#67 Posted : Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:28:28 PM(UTC)
Theophilus
Joined: 7/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 527
Man

Thanks: 3 times
Thanks for sharing this exchange Yada and Yada. That was quite a part two. I gather from the conclusion of this exchange that a third installment is unlikely? While I had some hope for Cantor initially based on his apparent ability to recognize Paganish aspects adopted within Christendom; after reading this follow on exchange, I regrettably conclude that Yada's assessment is correct and that religion has blinded CTJ severely.

It was sadly amusing to me to see Cantor attempt to tie Yada to Judaism, Jews for Jesus, Seventh Day Adventists, Chic, religious conspiracy theorists to name a few. Other than consistently avoiding the substance of Yada's points, the most shocking aspect of Cantor's logic to me was in slandering Yahweh's Scriptures, thus by extension Yahweh Himself, for the purpose of justifying Byzantine Catholicism!?!

Regarding Cantor's charge that Yahweh's miqra'ey came from Pagan agricultural religious tradition, it occurs to me that virtually all agriculturally focused peoples celebrate harvest seasons generally. The particulars of Passover, Unleavened Breads, and the others, however, recall Yah's intervention on behalf of his family to include later Messianic fulfillment and are both remarkable and unique.
Offline Yada  
#68 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:40:53 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Here is the final exchange between Yada and Cantor JT:

Quote:
Catholic Nincompoop

From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 2:05:38 AM
To: "Yada"

This fellow wrote a long reply to my last email. I only read the first few lines and responded to them. The rest I ignored, which is why it isn't posted below. I have no interest in continuing to waste my time with this jerk, and have done too much already. But this section is revealing.


On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:12 PM, wrote:

Dear Mr. Winn:

I don't know if I can keep up writing and commenting on all your replies. You are definitely hung up on the "name" of God worship. Kind cultish if you ask me; almost similar in vein to those who are into numerology. But In response to your ridicule of the Hebrew Scriptures:


JT 2: Let God arise and let His enemies be scattered!
Yada 2: ... the opening line is senseless and arrogant. Why “scatter His enemies.” Why not do some good by rounding them up and exposing their false religious teachings?
JT 3: Psalm 68:2


JT 2: As smoke vanisheth so let them vanish!
Yada 2: If this was the clerics next line, he is saying that he wants the “faithful” to vanish. That’s rather odd.
JT 3: Psalm 68:3


JT 2: So let sinners perish at the presence of God and let the righteous be glad!
Yada 2: We are all sinners. The purpose of the seven Called-Out Assemblies is to keep us from perishing in the presence of God. None of us are righteous—especially the cleric delivering this message.
JT 3: Psalm 68:4

Cantor JT,

I have already violated Yahushua's example, and one of my rules, by responding to someone with your poor attitude twice, so, I'll make this brief. I read your first three comments. That is all I will read and all I will address.

Yahweh's Scripture is focused on Yahweh's name. To call the use of His name a "hang up," and "worship" is ignorant, insulting, and errant. According to the third commandment, it is an unforgivable crime, one which will insure that you will never know Him. As such, you have no opportunity whatsoever to enter heaven.

To say that I am "cultish" to use Yahweh's name as Scripture presents it, is to infer that Yahweh is a "cultish god" as opposed to the creator of the universe and life. Since He is the only source of life, death will be the end of your existence.

To compare a focus on Yahweh's instructions, which condemn numerology, to such a thing demonstrates that you don't have the ability to think rationally. Scripture is clear, souls like yours are destroyed because they lack knowledge and because their consciences, or seat of judgment, has become dysfunctional.

And to say that I ridiculed the Hebrew Scriptures, by pointing out that the religious diatribe you submitted was inappropriate for Passover and for the resurrection, which is FirstFruits, is childish and ignorant in the extreme.

The citations from the 68th Psalm have absolutely nothing to do with Passover, Unleavened Bread or FirstFruits. The cleric saw "arise" in the translated text, and thought it fit when it doesn't. The 68th Psalm is about Yahweh's return on Yowm Kippurym in 2033, when His enemies will be dispersed from Him. That did not occur at the resurrection, which was my point. It was a senseless and errant remark in that context.

The psalm begins with one of the most insightful words in Scripture: "God stands up (quwm - establishes, confirms, and restores) and those who are hostile toward Him ('ayab - those who oppose Him) are dispersed away from Him (puws - scattered). Those who shun and detest (sane' - abhor and loathe, are openly hostile to and intensely dislike) Him are driven away (nuws - departing in haste) from His presence (paneh - appearance and face). (Psalm 68.2)

Those, like you, Cantor, who are openly hostile to Yahweh, who shun Him, will be driven away from Him on His Yowm Kippurym return--should your survive that long. The consequence of this separation is that your soul, like those in the passage, will be annihilated. No one was driven away from Him on FirstFruits--in fact, its message is the opposite of that. FirstFruits is a harvest of souls. Therefore, there was nothing wrong with the passage, only its use in the context of the resurrection.

Speaking of those who came to wage war on Yaruwshalaim, those who oppose Yahweh, "Like windblown (nadaph - that which is tossed to and fro, then driven asunder) smoke, they shall be blown away. Like bee's wax (downag - denoting the substance of religious candles), they will melt and waste away (masas - be turned to ooze, dissolving and vanishing, wasted and worthless) in the presence of the fire ('esh - a common Scriptural metaphor for God's Light and judgment). The wicked (rasa' - the guilty who are not upright and vindicated, the condemned) will be annihilated ('abad - destroyed and exterminated - which is to say that their souls will cease to exist) before (paneh - in the presence of) God." (Psalm 68.3)

The melting of bee's wax before the fire and being driven away like smoke are references to what happens to those who stage the ill-fated Armageddon attack. They will turn to ooze, melting and perishing before Yahweh upon His return, making this precisely the wrong verse to cite in the context of the FirstFruits harvest or even immediately following His Passover sacrifice. It is the absolute wrong thing to say in the context of the resurrection and the absolute right thing to say in the context of His return.

Upon His return, the Yahuwdym will finally understand that it was Yahweh whom they pierced (unlike the Byzantine Church which will remain clueless), and they will recognize who Yahweh is and what He did for them on Passover, Unleavened Bread, and FirstFruits, and as a result, on Yowm Kippurym, the Day of Reconciliations, "The upright (sadyq - the vindicated) will be delighted and filled with joy facing God, pleased and happy," just as the Psalm indicates. (Psalm 68.4)

"They will sing to God, melodiously chanting His personal and proper name, building it up as He rides through the clouds. Yahweh is His name. Be jubilant in His presence." (Psalm 68.5)

The passage is marvelous and wonderful, but it speaks of Yowm Kippurym, not Passover, and certainly not of the FirstFruits Harvest, meaning that it was not only inappropriate to cite it in a Pesach speech, it shows the cleric's and the Church’s complete ignorance of Yahweh's Called-Out Assemblies and path to salvation.

In Yahweh's name,

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#69 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:34:19 AM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
the thing I find most scarey about the world - is there are so many people like Cantor, they obviously want to see something but end up defending their religion in light of evidence. It makes me pretty sad.
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline sirgodfrey  
#70 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:19:46 PM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

seriously. it is most frustrating robski, i agree with you. its contradictory in nature to proclaim to love Yahuweh or "the Lord" but then when confronted with Scripture, in its proper context and proper translation, to completely disregard it.

let us pray for those that are truly seeking that they listen to Yah's soft voice and make their ways out of religion and ignorance.

praise Yah.
Offline sirgodfrey  
#71 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:24:20 PM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

Quote:
I have already violated Yahushua's example, and one of my rules, by responding to someone with your poor attitude twice, so, I'll make this brief


I wanted to clarify something for myself and gain deeper insight and understanding. That being said, is Yada referencing the "shake the dust off of you" type situation here if one does not "receive" you?
Offline Theophilus  
#72 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:53:29 PM(UTC)
Theophilus
Joined: 7/5/2007(UTC)
Posts: 527
Man

Thanks: 3 times
Quote:
Catholic Nincompoop‏
Maybe given the overwhelming significance to the person in question, "Byzantine" should be added before Catholic?

Quote:
Quote:
Quote: Yada wrote:
I have already violated Yahushua's example, and one of my rules, by responding to someone with your poor attitude twice, so, I'll make this brief


sirgodfrey wrote:
I wanted to clarify something for myself and gain deeper insight and understanding. That being said, is Yada referencing the "shake the dust off of you" type situation here if one does not "receive" you?


We would have to hear from Yada to be certain, but that was my take. Yada went to extraordinary lengths IMO to reach Cantor and provide clear answers from Scripture as to why Cantor's or anyone's religion when at odds with Yahweh as revealed in the Scripture is destructive and leads to soul desolation / lifelessness.

sirgodfrey wrote:
Quote:
seriously. it is most frustrating robski, i agree with you. its contradictory in nature to proclaim to love Yahuweh or "the Lord" but then when confronted with Scripture, in its proper context and proper translation, to completely disregard it.


It is indeed unfathomable to me that anyone who claims to revere "The LORD / HaShem" hopefully meaning Yah would knowingly cling to even cherished religious traditions when Yahweh's Scripture when fully and accurately rendered is unmistakable in condemning them. Then again maybe that is why we were drawn here and not remain in Mystery Babylon once our seeking was answered.

sirgodfrey wrote:
Quote:
let us pray for those that are truly seeking that they listen to Yah's soft voice and make their ways out of religion and ignorance.

praise Yah.

Amein
Offline Yada  
#73 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:59:40 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Yada just sent me both replies to Cantor which I've attached to this post.
File Attachment(s):
CantorJT.doc (66kb) downloaded 11 time(s).
CantorJT3.doc (28kb) downloaded 10 time(s).
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline sirgodfrey  
#74 Posted : Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:46:44 PM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

Quote:
The Savior’s name is not “Jesus.” If you don’t know God’s name and title, you don’t know Him. There is nothing more basic.


This is an uber strong statement. What are some thoughts on this from other brothers and sisters?
Offline Yada  
#75 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 6:56:04 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:31 PM, JK wrote:

I appreciated the Islamic Terrorism Timeline. Great page. However, I spotted an odd timeline error:

"Constantinople - named after the founder of the Catholic religion."

This is inaccurate. Constantinople was named after the Roman Emperor Constantine, who lived a full 300 years after Jesus, Peter, Paul and the other apostles, who formed Christian communities all over the ancient world.

Constantine was converted to Catholicism by his mother, St. Helen, so it would be a logical impossibility for him to have founded the religion that pre-existed him, and that he joined as an adult. His mother, St. Helen, is actually famous for having traveled to Jerusalem in search of the cross that was used to crucify the founder of her religion.

The Catholic church was already being described with the word "Catholic" in 110 AD, when St. Ignatius of Antioch said, "Wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."

A timeline page should be more careful about history!

Sincerely,

-JK


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Error on page‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 12:06:14 AM
To: JK

J,

I assume you are a Catholic. But whether of not that is true, you have been deceived--as have most Christians.

The Catholic religion was not established by "Jesus, Peter, Paul and the other apostles" as you claim. Catholicism was the furthest thing from their message. They did not start a religion, or even affirm a religion. In fact, they were anti-religious. Yahushua, according to His own testimony, simply confirmed and fulfilled the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms. Most of what He taught and did, Catholics ignore or have corrupted. The primary examples would be that He observed the Sabbath, Passover, Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, Sevens, Trumpets, Reconciliations, and Shelters, because they, and only they, provide the narrow path to Yahweh.

The Catholic religion has more in common with the Babylonian sun god religion than it does Scripture. Sunday worship, the Eucharist, Palm Sunday, Lent, Easter Sunday, Christmas, the Cross, the title "Church," statues, prayers, and titles for Mary, calling God "Lord," religious candles, holy water, popes, cardinals, sunburst icons, halos, priestly confession, infant baptism, purgatory, indulgences, and hundreds of other festivals, rites, teachings, and terminologies, especially the union of cleric and king, are rooted in the Babylonian sun god religion, not Yahweh's Scripture. For absolute proof of this read Yada Yahweh.

I have translated the words of Ignatius, and that is not what he wrote. And he isn't a "saint," because according to Scripture, revearing someone as a saint is an abomination.

"Jesus" wasn't used until 1629 CE. The Saviors name is Yahushua. "Christ" doesn't appear in any of the 70 pre-Constantine MSS of the Greek Renewed Covenant. The Savior's title is Messiyah. There is no word remotely akin to "Church" in Scripture and Ignatius didn't write it. Yahweh selected "ekklesia-called out assembly" because it is based upon the "miqra'ey-called out assemblies. "Catholic" simply meant universal; it was not a title in caps as you are using it. Moreover, it wasn't true at the time. There were many called-out assemblies--not one universal one. And when the universal one arrose under Constantine, Yahushua called it the "Seat of Satan, said it was "married to Lord/Ba'al," and was "dead," in his prophetic letters.

Constantine's mommy was no better than her arrogant, ruthless, and prower-grabbing son. In her romp arond the Promised Land, she got most everything wrong. Further, Constantine's vision of "a cross superimposed on the sun," and the message "under this sign conquer," is Babylonian by way of Mithraism. It is the antithesis of Scripture. More importantly, Constantine's Catholicism made following Yahushua's example and Yahweh's instructions illegal--punishable by death.

You have been deceived by a false religion. Learn the truth. Follow Yahweh's summons: Come out of Babylon. Read Yada Yahweh and discover who God really is and what He actually said.

A person shouldn't seek to correct a statement until they learn more about history and the Scriptures upon which their religion claims to be based!

Yada


"JK" replies:

Quote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM, "JK" wrote:

Yada,

Now I'm curious! I've never heard of this interpretation of the early Church, or the sayings of Jesus that you're referring to, or the "Yada Yahweh". And I have been an avid reader on the history of religion for all my adult life, so I'm genuinely curious. Is the "Yada Yahweh" part of your scripture? What religion do you belong to, specifically? What name would it be known by among Catholics, do you know?

-J


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Now I'm curious!‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 2:55:40 AM
To: "JK"

J,

I am pleased that you are curious, but I am surprised that you don't already know and understand what I shared with you if you are "an avid reader on the history of religion." Do you not know that Jesus is a man made name, circa 1629? Do you not know that Christmas, Easter, and Sunday worship are pagan and from Babylon? Do you not know that Constantine's god was Mithra--the Unconquerable Sun? Are you really unaware that God's name is Yahweh? Are you unaware that Yahweh established seven annual called out assemblies for us to attend and that the Christian religion conceals or counterfeits all of them? Are you unaware of the numerous and substantial differences between Yahweh's instructions and Christian doctrine?

What I have shared with you is what Yahweh says in the Torah, Prophets, Psalms and Renewed Covenant Writings. Yada is the Hebrew word for "know in a relational sense." Yahweh, actually Yahuweh, is God's one and only name. Yada Yahweh is an amplified translation of Yahweh's Word from the oldest extant Hebrew and Greek manuscripts along with a commentary.

I am irrelevant. Don't confuse the message with the messenger as religious people are wont to do. Yahweh is anti-religious as am I.

Here is a bit of simple logic for you. It is impossible for the Catholic religion to be truthful or reliable because it consistently contradicts in meaningful ways the Scripture upon which it claims its authority. So, if Yahweh is right and can be trusted, Catholicism is not and cannot. And if Yahweh is wrong and cannot be trusted, then Catholicism's authority vanishes. It is as simple as that.

The fact that you are unaware of this problem means that you are either unaware of what Yahweh actually revealed, unaware of how Catholic, and indeed most Christian, teaching differs from Yahweh's Word, you don't care about these things, or you aren't rational in your thinking.

Fortunately for you, in trying to understand Islamic terrorism, you have stumbled on a place where Yahweh's Word is presented accurately: www.YadaYahweh.com. What you do with this opportunity is up to you. While most of the letters I have received at Yada Yahweh are from former Catholics, I have found that it is stunningly difficult for a practicing Catholic to consider evidence objectively. Hopefully, you will.

Yada


The conversation continues:
Quote:

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, "JK" wrote:

Hi,

I'm trying to find out about Yada Yahweh. does "Yada Yahweh" refer to a scriptural document, or a book published by a religious group? Or is it the name of the religion itself? I've read a bit but it's not easy to understand where it's driving to.

Thanks!

J


Yada answers:


Quote:
Re: What is Yada Yahweh? A religion?‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 3:01:48 AM
To: "JK"

J,

The seven volumes begin with "Beginning" - http://yadayahweh.com/Ya...eh_Genesis_Reshith.YHWH. It clearly defines the book's purpose, sources, and methods.

As the prologue explains, Yada Yahweh is an amplified translation and commentary on the oldest extant Hebrew and Greek texts of the Torah, Prophets, Psalms, and Renewed Covenant Writings.

Yahweh is anti-religious, as is the book. If you are struggling to understand what God said, the reason may be that your current thinking has been corrupted by religious teaching.

Yada


"JK" writes:

Quote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:27 AM, "JK" wrote:

If I understand, Yada Yahweh is a movement to get back to the true form of the New Covenant, a kind of messianic faith that respects the Jewish religion Jesus proclaimed; and the people who call themselves Christians today are all following various corrupted versions of this lost faith?

Are you are the founder of the modern restoration of this movement? Were there any others like you in the intervening 2,000 years? Do you have adherents now?

-J


Yada responds:

Quote:
J,

There is no Yada Yahweh movement--only a respect for what Yahweh actually said and a passion to share it. That is the sole purpose of the book and site. For more on this read: http://yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis.YHWH

There is no New Covenant, only the renewal of the covenant Yahweh established with Abraham. And that covenant is relational, not religious. For more on it read: http://yadayahweh.com/Ya...weh_Genesis_Beriyth.YHWH

Faith is useless. Yahweh accepts trust and reliance. You have to know the evidence and then think your way to God. For more on this read: http://yadayahweh.com/Ya..._Assemblies_Bikurim.YHWH

There is no Jewish religion in Scripture--at least in a positive sense. God hates religion. Yahushua, not Jesus, proclaimed the message of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms--He attacked the Jewish religion. For more on this read: http://yadayahweh.com/Ya...Yahweh_Going_Astray.YHWH

Christians are following the Babylonian sun god religion. As such, the Babylonian faith is not lost. That iswhy Yahushua's last instruction to us is to Come out of Babylon, My people. For more on this read: http://yadayahweh.com/Ya...h_God_Damn_Religion.YHWH

Who I am is irrelevent. What Yahweh says is relevent.

I am not the founder of any movement--simply someone doing what Yahweh asked me to do. There are many, I suspect tens of thousands, maybe more, who know the truth regarding Yahweh. And God has always had witnesses throughout the ages. They are always unpopular. While their message is literally life and death, they themselves are meaningless.

I will never have an "adherent," as that would mean that I was placing myself over and above God, as the Roman Catholic Church has done, and that would be an abomination. Yahweh has many who know Him as He revealed Himself, and who have relied on the seven-step path He has provided. That said, according to Yahushua, the vast perponderance of people are lost, going down the wrong path. That would include virtually all Christians and all practicing Catholics.

Yada

Consider this explanation from the Sermon on the Mount:


Before we turn the page, there is one last thought I’d like to leave you with. As an essential element of His Sermon on the Mount, Mattityahu records Yahushua saying: “Therefore (houto) let your light (phos) shine (lampo – brightly) before (emphosthen) men (anthropos – humankind) so that they can see (horao – become acquainted with, experience, and pay attention to) your good (kalos – moral, fitting, advantageous, profitable, generous, beautiful, sound, and important) works (ergon – deeds, actions, that which you attend to, your undertakings and activities which are profitable) and thereby appreciate and honor (doxazo – come to conclude something positive and praiseworthy as a result of thinking judiciously about) your Father in Heaven (ouranos).” (Matthew 5:16)

Throughout His presentation of the celebration of the Passover, Yahuweh, who has referred to Himself as “our Father in Heaven,” has used the Hebrew term for “work,” ‘atah, to implore us to “attend, observe, and perform, gain and profit from” Pesach. He has used the Hebrew word for “good,” towb, to convey that its observance is “good, moral, generous, joyous, beautiful, and pleasing.” And we have heard Him speak of how the Passover celebration led to “halal, radiant cheering and beaming praise,” with the participants “shining brightly with a clear and visible light.” Mattityahu’s recording of Yahushua’s sermon affirms all of these things.

In this context, please consider: “Do not (me) assume (nomizo – suppose or acknowledge, following as a custom or tradition) that (hoti) I have come (erchomai – have arrived and appeared) to weaken, dismantle, invalidate, or abolish (kataluso – loosen, tear down, or dissolve, put an end to, do away with, or annul) the Torah/Law (nomos – prescriptions for living, statutes, ordinances, and duties as written and established in Scripture) or the Prophets (prophetes – those who spoke for God). I have not come to do away with (kataluso – invalidate or abolish) it, but instead (alla – on the other hand) to completely fulfill it (pleroo).” (Mattityahu/Matthew 5:17)

Yahushua came to fulfill the promises made in the Torah and Prophets, but then religious men came along and annulled them—replacing Scripture’s instructions with religious “traditions and customs” which far too many have “assumed” to be valid. Passover was abolished by Catholic clerics, and then it was replaced with the Last Supper, the Eucharist, and Good Friday. Unleavened Bread was annulled by religious clerics as if nothing happened on this day. And then FirstFruits was invalidated to make way for Easter—all in direct contradiction to Yahuweh’s and Yahushua’s testimony. Therefore, if God was telling the truth, the religion of Christianity isn’t.

Yahushua was as unequivocal as words allow. He came to earth as a man for the primary purpose of fulfilling the promises He made in the Torah and Prophets. And any intelligent review of His promises and His life leads to the conclusion that foremost on His agenda was the fulfillment of the Miqra’ey of Pesach, Matsah, and Bikurym with His sacrifice as the Passover Lamb on Passover, His journey into sheowl/hades on the Sabbath of Unleavened Bread, and subsequent resurrection on FirstFruits. And yet Christian clerics abrogate the idea that God prioritized the Miqra’ey in this way by suggesting that “to fulfill” means to “do away with and move on to something else.” But not only isn’t that a reasonable connotation of fulfill, their conclusion is in direct conflict with the first half of the passage, and even the first half of the last sentence—“I have not come to do away with it [the Torah and Prophets].

“Truly (amein – this is reliable and trustworthy), I say (lego – affirm and convey meaning with these words) to you, till (hoes) heaven (ouranos) and the earth (ges) pass away (parerchomai) not (ou) one (heis) jot (iota – the smallest letter, or yodh in Hebrew) nor tittle (keraia – the top stroke or horn of Hebrew letters) shall be passed by (parerchomai – be ignored or disobeyed, be disregarded) from (apo) that which was established in the Torah/Law (nomos – prescriptions for living, statues, ordinances, and duties as written in Scripture) until the time and place (hoes) it all (pas) happens (ginomai – comes to exist and takes place, is manifest in public in the context of history).” (Matthew 5:18)

The reference to “jot and tittle” is to Hebrew, as opposed to Greek, Latin, or English. These strokes and details are exclusive to the alphabet of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms—affirming an essential truth: Scripture was written in Hebrew. In Babylonian Hebrew, Yodh, the first letter in Yahuweh’s name, became a “jot,” a letter which is only one-third of normal height. “Tittles” are the upper extensions on the Hebrew letters: Beth, Daleth, Resh, Veth, He, Phe, Thaw and Qoph.

The Messiyah came for a singular reason, and it wasn’t to start a new religion. He came to completely fulfill that which was written about Him in the Hebrew Scriptures, in the Torah and by the Prophets. He did so by becoming the Passover Lamb, by removing sin from our mortal nature on Unleavened Bread, and by gathering us together and lifting us up to heaven on FirstFruits. It is the message which lies at the heart of the Torah. It is the message foretold by the Prophets.

These past two verses, and the one which follows, completely destroy the foundation of the Christian religion, as well as Judaism, Islam, and Mormonism. “Therefore (oun), whoever (ean) dismisses (luo – does away with, dissolves, invalidates, or abolishes) the least (elachistos – smallest and least significant) of these commandments (entole – precepts, prescriptions, ordinances, and authoritative directions, from entellomai, things which must be accomplished) or teaches (didasko – indoctrinates or instructs) people (anthropos) to do the same (houto – in like manner), they will be called (kaleo – referred to, designated, labeled, and named) the least important (elachistos – so small as to be insignificant, undignified) in (en) the kingdom (basileia – dominion) of heaven (ouranos). And whoever performs (poieomai – accomplishes and celebrates, practices and profits from) them, and teaches (didasko – instructs) them (houtos), they will be called (kaleo – referred to, designated, labeled and named) the greatest and most important (megas – extraordinary and dignified) in (en) the kingdom (basileia – dominion) of heaven (ouranos).” (Mattityahu/Matthew 5:19) It isn’t that the religious deceivers are among the least honored guests in heaven, it’s that those who are in heaven, see them as insignificant and undignified. And this means that they will be excluded from heaven.

“Because (gar) I say (lego – profess and promise) to you, that (hopi) unless (ean) your righteousness (dikaiosyne – integrity, legal standing, uprightness, and adherence to the relationship) is abundantly superior to (perissseuo – substantially greater than and in excess of) and more appropriate than (pleion) the religious teachers, judges, and high-ranking political officials (grammateus – experts, scribes, and scholars) and Pharisees (Pharisaios – members of a fundamentalist political and religious party comprised of hypocritical Jews who coveted authority, were overtly religious, set rules which others had to abide by, established religious rituals and traditions, and interpreted Scripture to their liking), you will never (ou me) move into or experience (eiserchomai) the realm (basileia – or kingdom) of heaven.” (Matthew 5:20) Today, you may rightly consider this list to include: popes, cardinals, bishops, priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, religious scholars and professors, publishers, media professionals, judges, presidents, senators, congressmen, and governors.

And that means that there is a way to heaven which bypasses both religion and superlative behavior. I think God spoke of this path in the conclusion to His Sermon on the Mount. Yahushua told us of a passageway which would be opened. “Ask (aiteo – make an earnest request) and it shall be given (didomi – granted as a gift) to you. Seek (zeteo – search for the information and location) and you will discover and experience it (heuriskomai – know the truth and find the place). Knock (krouo – request acceptance at the door) and it will be opened for you (anoigo – you will be granted entrance to the place and given access to understanding). For then (gar) all (pas) who make an earnest request (aiteo – ask) receive (lambano – will be acquired and accepted, will be taken by the hand and carried away). And those who search for the information and location (zeteo – seek and desire to obtain) will know the truth and find the place (heuriskomai – discover and experience it). Those who request acceptance at the door (krouo – knock) will be granted entrance and given access to understanding (anoigo – and it will be opened).” (Mattityahu/Matthew 7:7-8)

At this point, Yahushua tried to put this wonderful gift of eternal life in the company of our Heavenly Father into a human context we could all understand. He said: “What man is there among you, when his son shall ask him for a loaf, will give him as stone? Or if he should ask for a fish, would give him a snake? If then you being morally corrupt (poneros – bad, evil, diseased, and guilty, annoying, and prone to laborious harassment) know and understand how to (eimi) give good (agathos – valuable, upright, and generous) gifts to your children, how much more (mallon – by way of contrast) will your Father who is in heaven produce and give (didomi – pay to allow you to experience) valuable, upright, and generous (agathos – good) gifts to those who ask (aiteo) Him? Everything (pas) therefore (oun) to the degree (hosos) or case (ean – possible set of conditions by which) you choose and desire (thelo – propose, decide, want, and wish for) as a result of (hina) the actions and acts (poieomai – practices, performances, work, results, and accomplishments) of men (anthropos – human beings), in like manner (houto) you do (poieomai – bring about) for them.” (Matthew 7:9-12)

Within the context of gifts given by our Heavenly Father, there is none greater than what He did for us when He became the Passover Lamb and ransomed us from the penalty of sin on Unleavened Bread. Through His sacrifice He provided a way home—a path which begins with us attending, accepting and benefiting from Pesach, Matsah, and Bikurym and ends with us answering the summons to participate in Taruw’ah, Kippurym, and Sukah. Here then, is that path…

“For then (gar) this (houtos) is (eimi – was and will be, exists as) the Torah/Law (nomos – prescriptions for living, statutes, ordinances, and duties as written and established) and the Prophets (prophetes – those who spoke for God): enter (eiserchomai – start with and experience the first step in the journey) through (dia – by the way and means of) the (ho) narrow (stenos – exacting and specific requirement) gate (pyle – doorway, portal, and entrance)…” (Mattityahu/ Matthew 7:12-13)

Throughout Yada Yahweh, you will discover that there are a number of consistent themes which permeate Scripture. And very few of them are as essential as the truth imbedded within the Hebrew and Greek words quwm and histemi: “to stand upright so as to enable others to stand.” God stood up for us so that we could stand with Him. In Matthew 7:13, the root of the Greek word stenos, translated “narrow,” is histemi—something it shares with stauros, meaning “upright pillar,” but errantly rendered “cross.” So the message is: just as the lamb’s blood during the first Passover was smeared on the upright pillars and crossbeam of the doorway which led to life, so it was on Mount Mowriyah that the blood of the Lamb of God on the upright pole has become the narrow gate, the place where God stood up for us, meeting the exacting and specific requirements for us to stand with Him.

The narrow gate is Passover. Our path home begins here: “For then this is the Torah and the Prophets: begin by entering through the narrow, exacting, and specific doorway…”

“…because (hoti) the gate (pyle – doorway, portal, and entrance) is wide (platys – crafted and molded to be broad, expansive, open, and unreliable) and the path (hodos – road, way of life, journey, and route) is broad (eurychoros – wide open, ample, spacious, existing as a roomy realm) which leads away (apago – which deceives and influences someone to go astray) to the point of (eis – toward) destruction and perishing (apoleia – wastefully and needlessly destroying, squandering, eliminating from existence, and annihilating something valuable), and most (pleistos – a very great number, the vast preponderance, serving as the superlative of polus, many) are those (eimi – who exist) entering and experiencing (eiserchomai – starting the first step in their journey) through (dia – by way of and on account of) it (autos).” (Matthew 7:13)

Platys, translated “wide” in Matthew 7:13 is based upon the Greek word plasso, from which we derive the English word “plastic.” It means “feigned,” as in “fictitious, not genuine or real.” It conveys the notion that the expansive gate was “formed and molded,” having been “crafted by men from clay and wax,” making it “artificial and unreliable.” The wide gate is symbolic of man made religious schemes.

Apago, which tells us that the “unreliable gate and broad path” “leads away and astray by way of deceptive influences” is a compound word based upon apo and ago. Apo conveys “separation” which is the penalty paid by those who fail to capitalize on the “narrow, specific, and exacting portal” which leads to life with our Heavenly Father. Ago describes the process of “leading someone by taking hold of them, even accompanying them, guiding them” to “apo/separation” from God. And while that is descriptive of clerics and their religious schemes, and ties them to the “fictitious and expansive” gate “they have crafted and molded,” it also facilitates the conveyance of another aspect of apago: “to cause someone to be punished.” While the consequence of trusting man’s expansive religious schemes is the “wasteful destruction and annihilation” of your soul, the “punishment” for doing so is “separation” from God.

Simplified, the second portion of this essential pronouncement reads: “…because the doorway is crafted to be wide, artificial, and unreliable, and the way of life is wide open which deceives and influences someone to go astray to the point of destruction and perishing, needlessly squandering their existence, and the vast preponderance of people start the first step in their journey through it.”

More than any in Scripture, this next verse confirms that popular religions like Catholicism, Orthodox, Protestant, and Evangelical Christianity, Mormonism, and Islam do not lead to life: “The (ho) gate (pyle – doorway, portal, and entrance) is narrow (stenos – exacting and specific) and the path (hodos – road, traveled way of life, journey, and route) goes against the crowd (thlibo – is compressed, restricted, and narrow) which leads to life (zoe), and few (oligos) discover, learn about, attain, and experience (heuriskomai) it.” (Matthew 7:14)

Thlibo’s primary meaning isn’t “narrow” as it is most often translated, but instead “goes against the crowd,” so as to be unpopular. As such, those who take this path through life are often “oppressed,” a secondary connotation of the term. They “suffer hardship” and “are persecuted” because they “cause trouble” for the political, religious, and academic establishment.

There is an implication inherent in heuriskomai, which suggests a “careful examination, scrutiny, and observation which leads to understanding and recognition.” It is not an act of blind faith or the product of belief. Life is awarded to those who come to recognize who Yahuweh is, and what He has done for us, based upon what He has revealed in the Torah and Prophets. As a result of what they come to understand, they pass through the gate which is called Passover.

The final portion of God’s declaration on salvation reveals: “The doorway is exacting and specific, and the way of life is unpopular, which leads to life, and few experience it.”

Bringing it all together, we find the Messiyah Yahushua affirming that Yahuweh’s path as specified in the Torah and Prophets leads to life, while man’s more popular religious route leads to the annihilation of its victim’s souls.

“For then this is the Torah and the Prophets: begin by entering through the narrow, exacting, and specific doorway,…

…because the doorway is artificial and unreliable, and the way of life is wide open which deceives and influences someone to go astray to the point of destruction and perishing, needlessly squandering their existence, and the vast preponderance of people start the first step in their journey through it.

The doorway is exacting and specific, and the way of life is unpopular, which leads to life, and few experience it.”
The “narrow, exacting, and specific doorway” through which we must pass to fellowship with our Heavenly Father leads away from religion. The path to life is smeared with the blood of the Exodus lambs; it is stained by the blood of the Lamb of God on Mount Mowriyah. Our first step home must pass through the gate labeled “Pesach – Passover,” demonstrating our reliance upon the path God Himself has provided

Edited by user Friday, April 24, 2009 11:04:20 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#76 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 7:31:00 AM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
sirgodfrey wrote:
This is an uber strong statement. What are some thoughts on this from other brothers and sisters?


I would say I agree in many respects. I know that for example if it had not been learning about His Name, I would not ever have learnt anymore about Him... I think a lot of people know about Him... its kinda like the celeb culture... you feel like you know someone because you read about them or you see them on the news/TV all the time - but in actual fact you know nothing about them, and if you ever met them half the things you thought you knew about them were lies spread across the tabloids to make you read them in the first place.

To know Him is different, and I can vouch for that. lol
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline sirgodfrey  
#77 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 9:04:15 AM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

I must agree that learning of His name has opened many doors for me. Geez, how deep does the deception go. I cannot stop thinking about how so many people are duped. Ones that are laboring and toiling in the "name" of God maybe surprised come judgement - that is a scary thought to me dude.
Offline In His Name  
#78 Posted : Friday, April 24, 2009 9:38:02 AM(UTC)
In His Name
Joined: 9/7/2008(UTC)
Posts: 550

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
sirgodfrey wrote:
I must agree that learning of His name has opened many doors for me. Geez, how deep does the deception go. I cannot stop thinking about how so many people are duped. Ones that are laboring and toiling in the "name" of God maybe surprised come judgement - that is a scary thought to me dude.


Yep. 'How wrong can we be... and still be right?'

Learning His true name was the first "correction" to my spiritual thinking. It allowed me to shake off the blinders of knowledge, that kept me from even paying attention to anything that challenged my spiritual viewpoint, and see the false information that I had long accepted as truth.

At this point I just want to get as close to Him as possible!
“Because he clings to Me, is joined to Me, loves and delights in Me, desires Me, therefore I will deliver him, carry him safely away, cause him to escape from harm making him inaccessible and strong, and delivering him safely to heaven, because he has known, observed, cared for, recognized, instructed and advised others to use, designated, acknowledged, discerned, answered in, My name, authority, character, report, mark, and nature." Psalm 91:14
Offline Yada  
#79 Posted : Monday, April 27, 2009 10:06:51 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537


Quote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:30 AM, "MB" wrote:

Hi Yada

Could you share with me your understanding as to why Moses could not go into the promised land.

Some churches teach it is because he struck the rock, whilst he was instructed by YAHUWEH to speak to it, bearing in mind that previously he was told to strike it.

What does this mean in terms of being prevented to entering the promised land? Why would hitting a rock be so detrimental to him entering the Promised land, even though he was told to speak to it?

I know I am missing something here, is it a metaphor or something else.

As per usual Sir many thanks for your continued support.

-M


Yada's response:

Quote:
Moses was 120 years old. He had enjoyed three lives--one as a prince in Egypt, one as a prince in Arabia, and one as Yahweh's messenger. That's a pretty good life. I'd trade it for mine any day.


There is no doubt that Moses is in the Promised Land today. He was part of the FirstFruits harvest in 33. So, don't feel sorry for him.

What follows is what came upon me as I asked Yah to answer your question. While it makes sense to me, and while I think these insights are from the Spirit, please recognize that I am just a regular guy, more flawed than most. In this case, I have no Scriptual basis for these conclusions.

There are four reasons for the story. The Torah was given through Moses, and while it points the way to the Promised Land, Yahushua is responsible for getting us there. A fellow named Yahushua took over for Moses as Yah's children entered Yisra'el. Had Yahushua not fullfilled Passover, Unleavened Bread, FirstFruits, and Seven Sabbaths, the Way would have been a dead end.

And while Yahushua is essential to our salvation, Yahweh wants us to recognize that it is the Torah which provides the path to heaven. It provides the foundation upon which we gain the proper perspective to view God and ourselves--the very purpose of life. This instruction enables us to see the way home from our wilderness, just as it did for Moses.

And while salvation is a gift, that doesn't mean that Yah wants us to ignore, or more importantly, change, His instructions. Moses did and there was a consequence. This is a message to Christian and Jewish clerics the world over--one they don't understand.

Lastly, in Moses we see Yah's timeline. It is three periods of 40. Three 40 Yowbel timeframes form the foundation of God's plan of salvation.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#80 Posted : Monday, April 27, 2009 12:11:34 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I agree whole heartledly with both you guys.

and Godfrey it scares the pants off me, especially when you start talking and people think you are mad - especially the christians you know and love.
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline sirgodfrey  
#81 Posted : Monday, April 27, 2009 4:32:03 PM(UTC)
sirgodfrey
Joined: 10/2/2008(UTC)
Posts: 512
Location: North Carolina

Quote:
and Godfrey it scares the pants off me, especially when you start talking and people think you are mad


yeh its crazy. it is really kind of interesting to see people become illogical and irrational once they have been "converted" to christianity.
Offline bitnet  
#82 Posted : Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:47:50 PM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Shalom,

I really like the last reply that included The Sermon on the Mount. I copied it out and made a separate document to distribute whenever possible. Sigh! Very soon we'll be identified as followers of "Winnarism" who follow "cultic" Jewish practices...
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Steven Robinson  
#83 Posted : Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:43:04 PM(UTC)
Steven Robinson
Joined: 4/29/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2
Location: Kent, Washington

Hello everyone. I'm new here and have no idea what I'm doing. I just love Yahweh and the Yada Yahweh site.
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#84 Posted : Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:55:22 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Steven Robinson wrote:
Hello everyone. I'm new here and have no idea what I'm doing. I just love Yahweh and the Yada Yahweh site.


Hi Steven! Welcome to the forums :) If you can't figure anything out just ask away where ever - we can always move the topic :) Its best just have a good look around - you will soon figure it out im sure :)
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline bitnet  
#85 Posted : Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:23:51 AM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Shalom Steven Robinson,

Welcome and have a good time reading. I hope you are putting your nose into the free Yada Yahweh books, cos that's what we primarily discuss over here. In time, we hope that you shall know the Creator and us, and realise that much of what we had been indoctrinated with since birth is falsehood and should be junked for Truth as is written in Scripture, which this site does pretty well in expounding.
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Yada  
#86 Posted : Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:39:35 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
Re: Outreach Question from "RL"
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:30:55 AM
To: "RL"


On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:05 AM, "RL" wrote:

Hello Yada,

I understand that you communicated with Yada about seeking your thoughts on an outreach question I contacted him about. He proposes posting the exchange on the forum so we can all benefit.

The internet radio show news is truly exciting. Do you have details on how we can "tune in"? I'm pleased that Yada can be so generous with his time. I sense that getting the message out has been truly on his heart and this sounds like a productive means of accomplishing that aim.


I am sure that our web master and "Yada", will provide forum members with the means to listen to and engage in the program. Our first session will be Monday, May 25th, 12-2 PDT. I am told that this is the proper link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Yada

I've also been pondering how to effectively reach people as well. I'm certainly open to suggestions? I did something recently I doubted that I would ever do again and I’m still unsure the wisdom of. I ceased attending my local non-denominational church some time ago after finding it difficult to accept what I was hearing preached and sung. Especially grating was a song with a repeating chorus refrain of: "And his name is the Lord,...". While I believe that the intent of the faithful was to honor Yah, the words themselves did not.

Ken attends, participates, and enjoys it. I used to. I don't anymore. I agree with you.

I instead travel to a Messianic congregation but then only for the Miqra'ey, save the weekly Sabbath, which I now observe as a day of rest and contemplation of the Scriptures.

This is good.

A few weeks ago I received an invitation by a friend from my old church to attend a small group study on Philippians. I debated the matter and knew that he already accepted that I have convictions that while true to the Scriptures differ from his church. The first meeting turned out surprisingly well as we had a total of 5 attendees, and while reading Philippians in the language it is presented in discussion, I used the names as I knew them which provided teaching moments on names as one lady had never heard "Jesus Christ" referred to as Messiyah Yahushua. I’ve since determined to use printouts of Swalchy’s online translation of Philippians along with his introduction notes so as not to have to use the anglicized / corrupted names in my Study Bible and to explain what the earliest Greek manuscripts say and where the placeholders come from and mean.

Small group studies are often a good forum to share the truth. You'll have to see how the others react. If they are put off by what you say, leave. The truth is only useful in receptive soil.

I’ve also opted to "attend" a Saturday service, leaving the sanctuary quite early into the service and watched the rest from the video cafe which gave me the opportunity to read the Bikuwrym chapter of YY on a table along with a study bible opened to Leviticus 23, which included a chart showing the Miqra'ey. After the service let out, I met several friends that I had not seen in a long time. Most of them after asking how I was, wanted to know what I was studying and once again had the opportunity to teach some of what I've learned. I'm torn as to whether either action was ultimately productive or should continue, but I do so wish to open the eyes of these dear people who yearn to know God and share with them what I'm learning in order to better do just that.

Yahshua's example is to condemn lies wherever they are being promoted, but to engage telling the truth, only when there is an interest. To be blunt and bold, uncompromising in both areas. To be properly prepared so that you can explain the truth from the right perspective and so that you can confront lies accurately and rationally. And then share what you know to be true as long as the audience is receptive. When they push back, glaze over, become impatient or irritated, stop.

I find religious services so irritating that I never attend them. They are typically the last place you are going to find a receptive audience. But, if you feel called to serve there, if you see positive results, there is nothing wrong with doing so. Yahshua carried the truth to worse places. Go where the Spirit leads you.


What do you think?

On a separate question, I was hoping that you could update me on the status of the work on YY? I recall seeing an outline posted on the forum some months ago and realize that some has changed. I’m supposing for instance, that the “Salah-Freedom” chapter 2 Book II, replaces “Yisra’el chapter as the then proposed final chapter of book I? Would you anticipate revising additional chapters in books III-VII? Also would you have any sense as to when additional audio chapters will be available? I recognize that getting the revised chapters up in print will need to occur before any audio work.

Thank you,

"RL"


I rewrote all of Volume one, making significant changes and additions to most of the chapters--especially Reshith, Dabar, and Shabat. The last five chapters were fairly new, and thus didn't change quite as much.

I am still rewriting Volume two. As you know, I've added the Salah chapter. In this volume, the new chapters only share 5% in common with the old ones, so it is like writing a new 500 page book. And the new chapters are very, very long. My hope is that after Shabuwa', the the rewrites will go faster because three of the final five chapters were written more recently than the earlier ones and will thus be edited rather than be rewritten.

I expect major changes to Volume three, but no new chapters. This was the first volume I wrote, many years ago now. The same is true with Volume four as it was the second section written. I do not know what is going to happen with Volume five. I could write a another thousand pages in it--and would like to. I hope to add several chapters to Volume six. Most of the additional chapters will be in Volume seven. There I will write about the Tribulation. (Hopefully, before it begins.)

It takes too long to edit newly recorded chapters for me to devote the time to it now. And, based upon the rewites, all of the current audio files will have to be rerecorded.

Yada



Here is a copy of my volume/chapter outline:

Yada Yahweh



Book 1: Genesis – Why Are We Here? 324 -

A 00 Re’shith – Beginning: A Conversation With God… (18)

A 0 Dabar – Word: Do You Know My Name? (19)

A 01 Hayah – Existence: In the Beginning… (33)

A 02 ‘Owr – Light: And There Was Light… (19)

A 03 Chay – Life: The Story of Life and Time… (33)


A 04 Shabat – The Seventh Day: A Plan is Unfurled… (31)

A 05 ‘Eden – Joy: Living in Paradise… (32)

A 06 Nesamah – Conscience: Freewill, Judgment, Choice, and Consequence… (34)

A 07 Noah – Trustworthy Guide: The First Ark… (49)

A 08 Beriyth – Relationship: The Covenant… (27)

A 09 Mowriyah – Revere and Respect Yah: Meeting on the Mountain… (29)



Book 2: Called Out Assemblies – Understanding the Basics 523 -

A/B 01 Skia – Foreshadows: Relationship, not Religion… (42)

A/B 02 Salah – Freedom – Come Out of Her My People (48)

A/B 03 Pesach – Passover: The Story of Our Redemption… (58)

A/B 04 Matsah – Unleavened Bread: Removing Sin… (65)

A/B 05 Bikuwrym – FirstFruits: Fruit of the Spirit… (78)


A/B 06 Shabuwa’ – Seven Sevens: Sabbaths and Sevens… (40)

A/B 07 Taruw’ah – Shouting For Joy: Signal a Warning… (46)

A/B 08 Kippurym – Reconciliations: Answering the Summons… (57)

A/B 09 Sukah – Tabernacles: Camping Out With God… (25)

A/B 10 Yowbel – Power of the Lamb: Salvation’s Timeline… (48)

A/B 11 Miqra’ey – Called Out Dates: Yahweh’s Appointment Schedule… (15)



Book 3: Going Astray – America Reflected in Hosea 188

B 01 Azab – Abandonment: Where Did We Go Wrong… (28)

B 02 Chesed – Enduring Love: Hope Burns Eternal… (16)

B 03 Yada – Knowing: My People Are Destroyed For Lack of Knowledge…(25)

B 04 Shama – Listening: Who Do You Trust… (24)

B 05 Yashar – Stand Up: Walk With Me… (22)

B 06 Shav’ – Desolation: The Pursuit of Lifelessness… (25)

B 07 Thanatos – Separation: Where Are You Going… (19)

B 08 Ruach – Spirit: The Spirit of Life … (29)



Book 4: Salvation – Decisive Messianic Prophecies 202

C 01 Ma’sehyah – Implement of Yah: Tracking the Messiah’s Arrival… (36)

C 02 Immanu’el – God With Us: Tracking the Messiah’s Lineage… (25)

C 03 Chadash – Renewal: The Anticipated Restoration… (21)

C 04 Yshayah’el – God Exists As Man: Can You See the Light… (32)

C 05 Tsadaq – Vindication: A Gloriously Gruesome Prediction… (26)

C 06 Yesha’ – Salvation: No Greater Love… (15)

C 07 Zarow’a – Sacrificial Lamb: The Story of the Suffering Servant… (20)

C 08 Ga’al – Redemption: The Arrival of the Passover Lamb… (27)



Book 5: Good News – Historic Fulfillments 217

D 01 Makar – The Exchange: A New Cast of Characters… (31)

D 02 Metanoeo – Change Your Thinking: The Prodigal’s Son… (22)


D 03 Erchomai – Comings and Goings: Knowing When… (24)

D 04 Histemi – Standing Upright: The Crucifixion and Resurrection… (24)

D 05 Pecach – Passover: Three Days… (24)

D 06 Anastasis – Resurrection: What Will We Be Like… (33)

D 07 Sheba’ – Seven: There is a Pattern Here… (28)

D 08 Dawid – Love: Under Yahweh’s Shadow… (35) (Psalm 24, 86, 102, 88) (30)



Book 6: God Damn Religion – The Church Age 187 -

E 01 Krima – Damnation: Three Destinations… (23)

E 02 Ekklesia – Out-Calling: Revealing Letters… (22)

E 03 Pergamos – Men Conquer and Rule: The Seat of Satan… (17)


E 04 Jezebel – Exalting Ba’al: Married to the Whore of Babylon… (29)

E 05 Yahuwdy – Related to Yah: Knowing Yahweh’s Name and Word… (17)

E 06 Laodicea – The People Legislate: The Church Becomes Vomit… (14)

E 07 Pareisago – Clandestine Conspiracy: The Religion of Man… (24)

E 08 Kerusso – Proclaim the News: Let the Truth Be Known… (16)

E 09 Chrio – Drugged: The Wrong Way Down a Dead End Street… (25)

E 10 Anti-Religious/Political Scriptures (25)

E 11 Signs of the Time (Mt24, Lk21, Mk13, Lk12, 1Ths5, 2Ptr, Rm1, Jde, 1&2 Tim, 2Thes2) (30)




Book 7: The Last Days – In the Company of Evil 50 –

F 01 Paralambano – Accepted: Going On the Ultimate Ride… (7 / 35)

F 02 Sa’ar – Left Behind: America’s Fate… (39)

F 03 Anti-Messiah / Treaty / Nations (25)

F 04 Magog Federation & War (35)

F 05 Day of Doom (30)

F 06 Mystery Babylon (30)

F 07 Armageddon (30)

F X Choice – Making a Decision (4)





Red: Needs to be written, edited, and/or reformatted.

Black: Written but not recorded.

Yellow: Written and recorded without audio editing.

Green: Written, recorded, and audio edited.



Overall Length: 1177 Pages (5-1-07)

1395 Pages (9-28-07)

1561 Pages (12-22-08)

1700 Pages (3-15-09)








Topical Review: Let the Truth Be Known

T 01 Yahweh – I Am: What is God’s Name?

T 02 Logos – The Word: What Did the Word Actually Say (20 Errant Terms)

T 03 Grammateus – Scripture: The History of Translation (20 Errant Passages)

T 04 Manthano – Understanding: Can You Handle the Truth (20 Errant Doctrines)

T 05 Propheteia – Prophecy: Can Inspiration Be Proven (30)

T 06 Mow’ed – Time: Can a Timeline Be Established

Edited by moderator Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:47:39 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#87 Posted : Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:47:45 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:13 PM, "MB" wrote:


Hi Sir!

an extract from YY Shabat, Chapter 4

It is also accurate to say that God apart from man is diminished. Unless God intended to grow through human relationships, there would be no reason to create mankind or the universe. In the same way that we become greater through the experiences and conversations we share with our spouses and children, God grows. Seven is greater than one. To be deprived of loving, familial relationships diminishes our Creator.

There is no other viable explanation for why we exist.


My comment with regards to the statement located immediatly above (underlined):

May be their is another explanation, it however, can only be ascertained by Wisdom outside of our current mental jurisdiction however.

Growth is an essential element of life and relationships. And the Author of both is God.



My Comments:

Please forgive my ignorance Sir, if I am wrong.

I would never wish to cause offense to you Sir. But I am not to sure, that my position as a man is of that great an importance and impact to Father Yahweh's magnitude.

What I am trying to say is, relationship with me dose not make, Elohim Yahweh grow or diminish Him in any way, at least in my opinion.

"what is man that You are mindful of him"

Would I be wrong Sir, to appreciate the fact that I am just a lowly man? full of inequity and wrong doings. It's just who I believe I am, until I get washed in the Blood of YAHUSHUA.

I believe that it is by the washing of the Blood of The Lamb that a lowly creature as my self has even a hope of being tolerated by:




The Magnificent Creator of Creation, YAHUWEH




My apologies Yada if I just do not understand higher spiritual matters of YAHUSHUA.
I am truly sorry. Nevertheless, I find the other portions of YY that I do understand, absolutely brilliant, with out a doubt.

HalleluYAHUWEH!


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: What is man?‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 11:50:29 PM
To: "MB"

M,

In the midst of a controlling and indoctrinating religious culture, its hard for us to simplify and appreciate Yah's purpose in creating and saving us. Man is wont to put God on a pedestal and then bow down to Him, making claims about Him that He does not make about Himself.

When everything Yah said about Himself, mankind, our relationship, and the path home, is considered, and every religions claim is dismissed, the reasons we become fathers is the only rational and moral justification for our existence. And when one contemplates the nature of families, of life, love, and growth, I think that my conclusion is unavoidable--especially in context of Yah's ever-present formula.

But it's just my conclusion based upon the evidence. You are welcome to your own.

In writing Yada Yahweh, I have found that there are many things about God, which when presented, trouble people. God growing by knowing you troubles you.

My conclusion, based upon the whole of Scripture is that Yahweh wants us to get off our knees, stand up, and relate to Yah as our Father, not as a static force, unable to grow, love, laugh, hurt, or hate. The fact that God doesn't micromanage human lives, environmental disasters, or the countless other things attributed to him, doesn't mean that He doesn't care about His children, or that He doesn't gain something from His relationship with them. And if there is a benefit, if something is gained, God grows.

It seems unreasonable to me that God diminished Himself when He used a portion of His energy to create the universe. Something was given up so that something could be gained. It seems unreasonable to me that God's Passover and Unleavened Bread sacrifices for our salvation was a net loss, or even a zero sum endeavor.

The sperm, work, money, and time I have invested to create and raise my sons has made me richer. I have grown through them. It is what Yah intended.

Yada

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#88 Posted : Thursday, May 7, 2009 6:23:30 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:46 AM, "S" wrote:

Hi Yada

Would you believe I have only just received your e-mail dated 'Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:46 AM' !!

I was a member of both CSM and Answers in Genesis. I helped build the CSM Museum at Portsmouth, Le Hard with my dad. The last conference I went to was an AIG weekend some two yrs ago. They brought in a Hebrew Scholar to back up their literal interpretation of the 'Days of Creation event.

Indeed the verses are literal in the respect of 1 single day...However after our Heavenly Father told me to not be affiliated to any group that is not seeking Him for the truth in all thing's, he taught me what it meant.

That the days of Creation were in fact written literally but "From His perspective and not man's. It was after all, him recounting the tale to Moses I beleive.

So One single day of Creation means an 'aeon'. At least a minimum of 1,000 yr periods.

Without this in their thinking, the Creationist groups blinker themselves to discovering truth and continue to bend things to their agenda.

The only thing they have left going for them is that they are trying to counter the Evolution teachings. Commendable of course but if it is done in error, it can only crumble or be partly effective. If only they first sought the I AM and Messiah as the only voice of truth, logic and reason.

This is another reason why they hang on so desperatly to the New Testament of Rome and their beloved Paul, an agent of Rome to nullify Messiah true Gospel of the Kingdom. They therefore follow the Gospel of Grace and Lawlessness. Thinking they do right when breaking the Sabbath etc, leading to many good-intended deeds of Unrighteousnes. They Made, Believe and Love a Lie.

I got the thing about Light particles creating matter I believe from David Ickes finding's. I am intersted to know what your conclusions if any are regarding that.

I too found your work very enlightening. Especially regarding the shape and construct of space and how as things slow down nearer the earth. This I think might add weight to the concept of light slowing to a stop forming matter.

I tried to tell the CSM people about my finding's but they are blinded by their faith in errors. Therefore they may well fall into a pit. I was discarded as some kind of Heretic lol. All my work goes on Daniel Ott's www.TheEdgeAM.com

This is a link to my most recent project called The Gospel of the Kingdom part1. Please let me know your thoughts on it. (Might have to direct copy link into adress bar).

http://vids.myspace.com/...ual&VideoID=56909901

YAH Bless, "SH", aka: Watchman X, Edge AM Correspondent.


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Many thanks‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:09:06 AM
To: "S"

S,

You are clearly very passionate about the subject of creation and you are seeking to understand Yahweh's Word, both of which are good things.

So that you know, yowm does not mean "aeon," but instead "day" or "hot period." Also, the 1000 year reference isn't relevant to the act of creation, but instead to human history following creation. The universe isn't 6000 years old or even 13000 years old, but instead billions of years measuring time based upon a day here on earth. To understand time from the Creator's perspective, however, and not from ours, you need to understand Relativity and the nature of time at speed or near a greater mass. A yowm doesn't flow at the same rate everywhere, and most especially at the place and time of the big bang, to use Yahweh's words.

To answer your second question, energy and matter are the same thing. Matter is just organized energy. Matter is also moving, we just don't know how fast. Everything is in constant motion. Light is energy, so turning light into matter is simply a result of power, influence, design, and organization by Yahweh.

Scientists are anti Creation and Creationists are anti Science, and both have established belief systems which are foolhardy. In truth, the actual evidence which has been made available to us by scientists is completely consistent with Yahweh's testimony--albeit that God beat the scientists to it by 3500 years.

Yada



A follow-up:

Quote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:30 PM, "SH"om> wrote:

So the day really is just an expression of eternity in YAH''s realm. However we still have the 'day' that Adam was given to die in which took over 900 yrs or so.

In my experience, it is only the truth seekers and those who go to YAH first rather than men, that end up walking the same narrow path. The longer the journey the narrower it gets. Those who stubbenly refuse to drop the dross stay stagnant. Stiff-necked I believe the term is :-)

YAH Blesss,

"S"


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Many thanks‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:06:11 AM
To: "S"

A day has a specific length, one that is relative to the speed of or the mass near the observer. However, at the speed of light, time simply exists and does not flow.

The reference to Adam's death was that upon eating the forbidden fruit, he was on that very day expelled from God's company--the consequence of which is death. His soul became mortal with the first bite.

Men are helpful in providing the tools with which we can examine Scripture, but in the debate between Yah and men in religion and politics, I side with Yah 100% of the time.

Yada

Edited by user Saturday, May 9, 2009 8:04:12 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline bitnet  
#89 Posted : Thursday, May 7, 2009 7:09:48 PM(UTC)
bitnet
Joined: 7/3/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,120

Shalom,

Am I the only one to catch what this guy said?

Quote:
This is another reason why they hang on so desperatly to the New Testament of Rome and their beloved Paul, an agent of Rome to nullify Messiah true Gospel of the Kingdom. They therefore follow the Gospel of Grace and Lawlessness. Thinking they do right when breaking the Sabbath etc, leading to many good-intended deeds of Unrighteousnes. They Made, Believe and Love a Lie.


Hmmm... looks like this person 'S' has misunderstood Paul's messages as well. He reminds me of a Messianic Jew who refuses to accept Yahushua as haMashiach.
The reverence of Yahweh is the beginning of Wisdom.
Offline Yada  
#90 Posted : Thursday, May 21, 2009 6:19:08 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, "MB" wrote:

Question time Sir............no disrespect intended, I just find that by asking questions I get a better understanding.
Forgive me if I am taxing your patience, I am not a great thinker, hence require a little extra assistance with respect to the higher matters of Father Yahuweh's business.
------------------



While there is joy in the midst of sorrow, and joy is more than the absence of sorrow, perfect joy requires an abolition of sorrow. This is the reason Yah must abolish the existing universe at the end of the Millennial Sabbath and replace it with a new one.
from: Eden YY


Question:
I think this sounds really good, but what makes you know that this is the reason?

Answer:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This sounds like a nice place. And fortunately, we have a confirmed reservation. While I can’t prove it, knowing Yahuweh, I suspect that our eternity is going to be exciting, a time of great adventure, discovery, entertainment, and joy. I think, and these words seem to confirm, that we will be able to sense and see more than we can now. When we are elevated from three dimensions to a minimum of four and perhaps to as many as seven, I think Yahweh is going to provide us with the ability to discover and discern things which we can’t even imagine—even if they were explained to us.
from: Eden YY

Question:
I am also very comfortable with the aforementioned, and thank you for this awareness.

But supposing I cogitated that instead of 7, why not 700 or 7000 or even countless dimensions. Why are you comfortable with specifying 7 dimensions?

Answer:



Thank you Sir, for your valuable time in replying to my questions.

MB


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Request‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 12:09:58 AM
To: "MB"

MB

In the context of abolishing sorrow, as God confirms in Revelation, we must be unable to see our past individually and collectively, and yet when we become more like God and have the ability to maneuver in time as a dimension, if the present universe continued to exist, we would have access to our past failings. The only way to avoid this is to destroy the old universe and create a new one. So, in this context, it is the reason. That doesn't mean that within other contexts, there aren't other reasons. But the destruction of the old universe and the creation of a new one is set into the same context by God at the end of Revelation, which is why I made the connection.

As for why seven, it's the foundation of everything Yah does and it fits our observable reality. There are three fundamental things dominating our universe that we don't understand in addition to the four we do understand. I don't claim it to be so, and I can't prove it to be so, but only say that it is a completely consistent conclusion based upon what we know in science and Scripture.

Neither of these conclusions is particularly important, and neither have any bearing on our salvation or understanding of God. They were only added because they provide insights on why things are as the are and are said to be. Such commentary is only provided to encourage people to think for themselves, to ponder what God has said, and to consider Scripture's imprecations. God isn't verbose. He includes things for a reason. And He consistently defines thinking as the process of gathering information and making connections.

You may have entirely different explanations and draw different conclusions. And so long as yours were consistent with Scripture and observable evidence, the fact that they may differ from mine wouldn't mean that either of us was wrong. Many times there are multiple insights all of which are correct.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#91 Posted : Thursday, May 21, 2009 6:22:10 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:19 AM, "JM"wrote:

http://news.sky.com/skyn...s_Mans_Earliest_Ancestor

What do you make of this?

-JM


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Missing link?‏
From: Yada (Yada@winns.org)
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:43:30 AM
To: "JM"

J,

It is stunningly pathetic. It's a monkey which has made a monkey of men.

It is obvious that homo Sapians have existed for a hundred thousand years--long before Adam and Chawah were expelled from the garden. And it is obvious that man, apart from our nesamah/conscience is an animal like every other animal. Scripture says as much. But to think that this little lemur fossile is "the missing link which prove Darwin right" is pathetic in the extreme. (Not to mention that Darwin's natural selection theory based upon positive mutations within genes is mathematically impossible.)

Science has become less credible than the religious clerics scientists have assailed. The more they protest, the more they make fools of themselves.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#92 Posted : Friday, May 29, 2009 7:44:28 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537


Quote:
Re: Totally Confused‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:21:02 PM
To: "JG"

They would be right in saying that Yahushua isn't Jesus, because Yahushua is the Savior and Jesus is an errant man made name. As for saying that Yahweh isn't God, that would make them ignorant and irrational. You can fix a lot of things, but you can't fix stupid.

But the question is, why are you confused and why do you care what a friend believes?

Yada

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 7:21 PM, "JG" wrote:

I am confused. I heard from a friend that he believes that "Yahushua" and "Yahweh" are NOT "Jesus" and "God". What would you say to this?

-J
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#93 Posted : Monday, June 1, 2009 7:28:39 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

I had to write to Yada today:

Quote:
Yada - I've got to ask, what do you think of the GM filing of bankruptcy and the US and Canada govts. taking direct ownership positions?


His response simply was:

Quote:
Socialism is as socialism does.
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#94 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 2:24:54 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:32 PM, "SR" wrote:

Is there an online source for the proper translation of the scriptures? The renewed covenant uses the word christian several times and I'm wanting to find out what word was really used. For example King Agrippa say's to Paul, 'you almost persuade me to become a 'christian'.


Yada's response:
Quote:

From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 6:39:22 AM
To: "SR"

Steve,

Please read the prologue of Yada Yahweh. Your questions are answered there, and those answers are proven throughout the chapters which follow. For example, in the prologue, you would have discovered that there are no "proper translations of the scriptures." Moreover, according to the Scriptures, the Renewed Covenant isn't Scripture. If you want to know what Yahweh said, you'll either have to read Yada Yahweh, or buy the tools and invest the time to translate the Word yourself.

The first Followers of the Way never referred to themselves as Christians. The basis of the Greek word means "drugged and whitewashed." It was used as an epithet. Crisos, isn't written out on any page of any of the seventy pre-Constantine manuscripts of the Renewed Covenant, for this and other reasons.

You can't tell what word was used by reading the Renewed Covenant because unlike the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms, where Hebrew conversations are recorded in Hebrew, Greek was a translation of Aramaic conversations. So by the time you get to English, you have a translation of a translation.

Yada


The conversation continues:

Quote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 AM, "SR" wrote:

If the cross is a pagan symbol why is it mentioned so often in the renewed covenant? For example Matthew 10:38 And he that taketh not his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. There are plenty more examples. I e-mailed you recently and inquired about where I could find an uncorrupted copy of the scriptures and I never heard back from you, how come? I'm searching for the truth and if you have it I want you to share it with me. I think it's important.


Yada replies:


Quote:
Re: The Cross‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:06:19 AM
To: "SR"
Steve,

If you have an interest in learning, if you can handle the truth, you should stop writing me an start reading. It isn't appropriate for anyone to rewrite their research for people who are unwilling to invest the time to read what they have already written.

The pagan origins of the cross symbol are so easy to find, so you shouldn't be questioning that statement. Further, the Greek Renewed Covenant word which was changed by the Catholics in the sixth century to cross to honor their god is stauroo and stauros, which mean "upright pole"--not cross. The Greek word is based on histemi, "to stand up so as to enable others to stand." Properly understood, it is one of the most important concepts in Scripture. And as such, this message is central to Yada Yahweh.

Apart from errant renderings and copy edits, there is no mention of a cross in Scripture or in the Renewed Covenant Writings. None. And crosses were pagan symbols three thousand years before Constantine and his buds incorporated the sun god symbol into Christianity.

I have made the ten thousand hours I have invested in researching Yada Yahweh free and available to everyone who is able to read English. Rather than ask why I didn't stop everything I was doing to immediately answer questions I've already answered, you should have asked yourself why you weren't willing to invest the time to read those answers and why you chose to challenge something you currently know so little about.

My experience with people who cling to religious symbols and dogma is that no amount of evidence or reason will alter their mindset. You want to justify the use of cross, for example, when there is no basis for the term apart from religious corruptions, and yet, at least thus far, you have chosen to avoid the evidence. It is a good thing that you are questioning the appropriateness of English translations and the use of Christian, but for this quest to have any merit, you are going to have to change your perspective, change your way of thinking, and invest a lot more time learning.

If you do, and if you read Yada Yahweh, write me again.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Yada  
#95 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 2:30:58 AM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:06 AM, "JY" wrote:

HELLO Yada,



I HAVE LISTENED TO ALL YOUR AUDIO BOOKS YOU HAVE ON YOUR SITE ABOUT 5 TIMES. PLEASE DO MORE AUDIO ON THE CHAPTERS OF YADA YAHWEH THAT YOU HAVE NOT COVERED. I DON’T HAVE TIME TO READ, AND I LISTEN WHILE AT WORK.



THANK YOU FOR SPREADING THE TRUTH ABOUT YAHWEH,


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: AUDIO BOOKS‏
From: Yada Yahweh (email@yadayahweh.com)
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:17:36 AM
To: "JY"
Jon,

The YY audios are very old and they only cover a tiny portion of the book as it now stands. They take a lot of time to record and edit which is why there aren't more of them.

I am beginning a series of five weekly one hour internet radio programs, all of which will have the audio posted on the site in MP3s. Currently you can find the first two shows at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Yada.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#96 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 2:44:19 AM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
it was weekly but it wasnt last monday was it? lol what happened? whens the next?
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline kp  
#97 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 4:35:43 AM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

The Blog Talk Radio segments are scheduled to begin (for real) next Monday, and will be a daily thing. Yada has me scheduled for Tuesdays (Torah) and Thursdays (Prophecy). He'll be on Monday (Yada Yahweh), Wednesday (Islam and Terrorism), and Friday (Scripturally relevant news), and I believe Jim ("Yada") is planning a Forum Fellowship segment for the Sabbath. Pray for us, friends---this is a big and potentially far-reaching shift in our modus operandi. And I, for one, have no idea what I'm doing :-)

kp
Offline James  
#98 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 7:48:32 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,610
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 208 time(s) in 146 post(s)
I can't wait. What is the time frame?
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline kp  
#99 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 9:13:24 AM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

The time frame: they'll all begin at 10:00 AM Pacific time (1:00 PM Eastern).

kp
Offline Yada  
#100 Posted : Thursday, June 4, 2009 5:00:49 PM(UTC)
Yada
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3,537

Quote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:45 PM, MK wrote:

Hi,
I am enjoying your book very much.
However, your mention of Ron Wyatt's discoveries proving the Bible is accurate may come back to bite you.
See page number 337 in Prophet of Doom.
I have researched this guy more than once because emails keep going around that mention him and his "Amazing" discoveries.
I have yet to find anything that convinces me that he ever found anything verifiable.
The more you read about Ron Wyatt the weirder it gets.
I would remove the reference if I were you.
I doubt your enemies have the stamina to wade through the whole thing, but why give them anything to use to try to discredit an otherwise amazing book
Thanks.


Yada's response:


Quote:
Re: Ron Wyatt‏
From: Prophet of Doom (email@prophetofdoom.net)
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 12:28:53 AM
To: MK

M,

I appreciate your concerns and I share some of them, but not all of them. I have read and listened to everything that Ron wrote and produced before his death. I have examined the evidence myself in his museum. And I have spent a day with his widow, filling in the blanks. In addition, I've investigated his claims on the Ark, Sodom, and the Exodus, and I am personally convinced that he is right based upon my research into them. Further, while there is no evidence to support Ron's claim to have found the Ark of the Covenant, the fact that its location and status is completely out of sync with Ron's Christianity, and completely in sync with Yahweh's testimony, causes me to conclude that he indeed saw it.

I have also read the arguments of many of Ron's critics, and have found them to be inaccurate and baseless.

These things known, I am opposed to all religions, including Christianity and Judaism (read Yada Yahweh for that), and therefore, I am troubled by much of what Ron has to say. And there are things which he has written which I don't agree with historically. But on the whole, I am an advocate of exposing Ron's evidence and reasoning, just as I am an advocate of promoting the evidence and reasoning of Alexander Hislop in the Two Babylons--another case of the critics being wrong.

Lastly, I am troubled by some of the work that is now being promoted under Ron's name, and I therefore share your concerns. But if I recall correctly, the two Ron Wyatt references in POD is regarding the location of Noah's Ark and the Red Sea crossing. And of those finds, I am all but certain (and so is by the way are the Turkish and Saudi Arabian governments). The evidence I have seen is overwhelming.

I would encourage you to buy the booklets and cds Ron created in support of the Ark and Exodus discoveries and judge them based upon his research rather than his critics.

There is however, a glaring mistake on page 337. Yowm Kippurym isn't a fast. That, as is the idea of "afflicting one's soul," is a rabbinical corruption.

Yada
If you'd like to join the YY Study Group room on Paltalk - just click here. The lockword is: yadayahweh
You can download the free software here.
Hope to see everyone on Paltalk!
WARNING: Do not give out personal information (name, address, etc.) to anyone on Paltalk - ever!
Users browsing this topic
14 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.