Forgive me if I made mistakes in posting..still learning. The first post above should have a line in point 2 bolded..but hmm let me try again. Practice makes perfect.
James wrote:Welcome Kent, we are happy to have you.
Thank you. You know about that hmm what is it? Only 1% that really care..took the effort to post?
I really do. Took me an hour to type that first post. To show further appreciation to Yada and the team's works.
He responded to my emails in lightspeed..and I just cant thank him enough, hence coming here to show support as he suggested.
And furthering and accelerating my learning process..definetely.
Quote:If you are wanting Yada to respond you will have to email him,
email@yadayahweh.com, He almost never checks the forum unless someone emails him about it, and never corresponds on it. He does however answer most every email he receives. If you are interested in conversing with those of us here at the forum, and I hope you are, then this is the right place.
You know what? I am almost 40 years old. Spent a lifetime trying to have an intelligent discussion regarding our Creator. Yet no place..I mean NONE at all..that will accept a fair and open-minded forum for this purpose. All other places have this rules against religion and politic being discussed. Hope this is a unique place.
Quote:I would agree with this to a degree. When we are engaging in a one on one, it is definitely more productive to hold off on condemning things outright, but rather to let the truth condemn it. I think however if you are writing or communicating to a mass audience it is important to condemn both outright and with the truth that which Yahowah condemns.
Most of what Yada says about Islam is condemning it with the truth, Muhammad was a rapist, a pedophile, pirate, and a terrorist, these are all facts, and while condemning of him they are the truth.
Just my opinion.
I do understood. Hence just a suggestion. Words have different meanings to each individuals. Depending on their personal experiences and brain-washed dogma.
For instance..instead of saying rapist..perhaps reword it to a more politically-correct and hence hard-to-deny title..or just quote it as fact..like
"He forcibly assault women sexually."See the difference? Dont give them ammo. Dont throw more wood into the fire. For example :
"Muhammad was a rapist, a pedophile, pirate, and a terrorist"
"Muhammad forcibly assault women sexually, even underage (havent reach puberty/havent started menstrual cycle) children.
He also publicly rob others of their material wealth and freedom of movement, without consent or provocation.
He definitely condone spreading fear on peaceful community, with intent of gaining beneficial conditions on himself."lol A waste of time, spaces and words. Right? But sometimes its useful, depends on the opponents or target audiences.
Yeah lack the punch and sometimes didnt get the real meanings through. But, just a suggestion. lol
Imagine this from myself..who wont compromise on any shades of Gray.
Quote:A rework of the website is in the works, as soon as the new book is finished, and I imagine Yahowah’s name will take center stage.
Just curious how you came to the Yehowah rendering, I have never seen that rendering of the father’s name.?
Oh, that was my mistake. Yada did emailed me the revelation of Yahowah. But decades of brain-wash and habits, hard to correct. Thanks for the reminder.
In Indonesia, we use local translation for almost everything. Sometimes its beneficial and closer to the original source, actually.
For instance King David, is known here as Daud. Similiar to Dawud or Daywud rite?
Jesus is Yesus. Jacob is Yakub. Moses is Musa. etc etc
Not only for scriptures, but for other religions too. Local names, sometimes much difference than original.
As for Yehowah, we know it from Jehovah = Yehowah.
I think I prolly better force myself to stick to Yah from now on.
Its appropriate too, as in Indonesian..Yah = Father.
Quote:Thanks for the input Kent, I hope you will stay around and continue to offer your input, and insights. Again welcome to the forum.
I intend to learn a lot first, before asking further questions. Pointless to jump around or straight to (but actually missing) the point.
I read here that some even joined here for a year, reading around and then started to post. lol
To better understand me..I rather follow the Theravada school of thought, then Mahayana one..of Buddhism.
Till next time. So long and thanks for the fishes. lol