The following is an exchange between 'Curious' and Yada. Has anyone seen this movie?
Quote:From: 'Curious'
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:17 PM
To:
email@ProphetofDoom.netSubject: Movie against Yahuweh
Mr. Winn,
Lately, I’d been hearing of a new movie which supposedly lays to rest claims of “Christianity’s” divinity. This movie is called “Zeitgeist.” I know you had spoken before about half-truths. My knowledge is only still growing and I’m only on the second book of Yada Yahuweh. I was hoping you could see what this claim is about. From what I’ve been able to catch off of YouTube, the movie seems to make the similar references about how there were “versions” of “Jesus” (Yahushua) before him. You bring up such references in showing Halal ben Sachar’s demonization’s of him. The movie plays them off to be, not similar, but direct plagiaristic copies.
I was just hoping to get your take on it and wondering if you’d come upon resources earlier than it. Maybe I’m missing something, but I know this movie is passing along as a reference to it by a co-worker was made. To refute it, I need the knowledge slowly coming from Scripture. However, what I don’t have memorized are the dates of written pertaining documentation.
Whatever your response, I thank you for your time.
“Curious.”
Dear Curious,
Since I don’t have broadband on our farm, I won’t be able to see the movie. But if it is as you claim, it is not unlike another zillion attempts to fool the poorly informed and unthinking. The other recent example of this was the appearance of Yahweh’s name in early writings found in Yisra’el, combined with a passage which shared a word picture with Ezekiel. Scholars presented it as evidence Scripture was plagiarized when it actually confirmed that what Yahweh had revealed was precisely accurate. The difference between these polarized views is information and judgment.
The first Satanic variation of Yahushua was conceived in Babylon circa 2500 BCE. It is the basis for the Catholic Madonna, for Easter, Christmas, Sunday worship, and the cross today. Every sungod religion since the dawn of recorded history has had the son of the sun suffer and die, only to be resurrected. There is always a Madonna and Child, and thus Queen of Heaven and Mother of God who gets impregnated on the Sunday nearest the Vernal Equinox, delivering the divine child nine months later, in what Christians celebrate as Christmas. So, it is the Satanic counterfeit which is similar to the “Jesus Christ of Christianity,” not the Messiyah Yahushua of the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms.
The sun god counterfeits include: Nimrod, Ninus, Tamuz, Isis, Adonis, and Bacchus to name but a few. The fact Satan is bad, doesn’t make him stupid—although he certainly lacks originality and creativity.
The existence of a counterfeit never nullifies the authenticity of the genuine article. It only serves to suggest that the real thing is worth trying to copy. Therefore, the movie’s primary premise is flawed. For example, the fact that the city-state of Athens, the Delian League, Sparta, the Roman Republic, and the Presbyterian Church had aspects of their governance which were similar to that found in the US Constitution, does not make the US Constitution a fraud.
The proof of Yahweh’s existence and of His human manifestation Yahushua, can be found in His Word. Anyone who takes the time to study what Yah revealed will find overwhelming proof of His trustworthiness. Personally, for proof that Yahushua is Yahweh in human form, I’d rely on the prophetic passages found in the volumes of Yada Yahweh dedicated to the Miqra’ and Salvation. Between them, you’ll find 20 chapters of compelling evidence.
I’ll send a copy of this email to the YY Forum Moderator and ask him to see if one of the forum’s members wants to watch the movie and report back on what they find.
Yada