logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Heretic Steve  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:32:34 AM(UTC)
Heretic Steve
Joined: 9/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 258
Location: ohio

An apparent contingency for hiding/evacuating the Ark of the Covenant, (as well as other ceremonial stuff), was hypothesized by Rood. This hypothesis is included in KP's FH, chap 13, (Jerusalem, Jerusalem).
An observation... Assuming this hypothesis is correct, the builders of the Temple should have asked themselves why this contingency was needed. The obvious answer? To protect the Ark from theft/vandalism in the event of invasion/capitulation of Jerusalem. The perhaps not so obvious follow up ques? Why would Jerusalem be sacked? One wonders if they pondered on this issue during the construction?
If not us, who? If not now, when?
Offline kp  
#2 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:45:27 AM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

Good question, Steve. Solomon himself provides the answer in his Temple dedication prayer recorded in II Chronicles 6. There he petitions Yahweh to hear the prayers of repentance from Israel when (not if) certain things would occur in their future: sins against one's neighbor (vs 22); defeat at the hands of an enemy (24); rain is withheld (26); famine or plagues (28); and finally, deliverance and deportation of the nation into the hands of an enemy because of Israel's sins (36). Solomon was a wise guy, after all. He knew human nature (though he couldn't, in the end, control his own). I think he somehow knew that Israel would someday turn their back on Yahweh, and that their sorry assets would subsequently be carted off to some foreign land as a prize of war.

Rood's hypothesis rests on the idea that Solomon did indeed take steps to protect the ark and other temple furniture in the event of this inevitable future invasion. Wyatt's hypothesis, on the other hand, assures us that no such preparations were necessary. He thought the ark could have been spirited away to a hastily prepared hiding place under cover of darkness, perhaps masquerading as a funeral procession. I don't presume to know which hypothesis is correct (if either). But it is clear that Solomon did forsee a day when the ark would require protection if it were to be preserved, and it's also pretty clear that he's just the kind of guy who could have engineered a solution ahead of time.

kp
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.