I would like to hear more on Shattering Myths about the so called Hidden books that were not included in the bible, such as Maccabees and Enoch and others!

My concerns over the Nicene council are non existent, since canonisation is not a standard by which we should or should not consider God's original word!

My question is what were all the books of the original Towrah, has that itself been changed in any way and should we consider any of the so called lost books?

The friday 18th August show was right on the button, just after my find of the 1611 KJV preface posted here in the scripture section, the show was most interesting and since this is being continued next week, this request would seem to be on the same subject, since changes in text, additions, deletions and mis translation of text is of concern to all, but what about the missing books? What is kept from us and is it important?

Thank you!

Hi Stewart,
I do believe that the book of Enoch was written years after he went with Yah, as for its authenticity that it is written by Enoch himeself, it is very doubtful . As for the Maccabee's they revolted against Rome mainly the evil greek emporer Antiochus. That is why the Jewish holiday "Hanukkah" is celebrated. Supposedly a miracle of one days oil lasted for eight days thus the eight days of Hanukkah. I beleive this miracle was falsely claimed.

This is a good article on Enoch.
http://yahowahberyth.com...rticles/rejecting-enoch/

Sorry to keep posting, but I came to the point of realizing that a related subject would be most beneficial in this ongoing subject of faulty translations and that is the "Mark of the beast" in itself a fascinating subject and one I would like you to cover if you would be so kind?

So I have a few ideas, these are only my ideas and may be wrong, but it does occur to me that our whole perception of the "Mark" could be so off the "mark" because of the Christian perspective. They say this will be a microchip, maybe part true but there is more to this than first considered!It's all smoke and mirrors!

Since you are talking about translations and errors, we all know what we do when we write our name or sign a document - we make our "mark" to verify that we have authorised a transaction, our "mark" is recognized.

How much more then a false translation is "mark" of the translator, authority, or church it represents! The Roman Governement and Catholic Church have certainly left their "mark" in and on the Bible. The whole Christian world receives and uses that "mark" which is ingrained into their psyche and of their congregations, indeed the Beast of the Church of Babylon, the "Mark of the beast" is it not what you believe, or have been led to believe because of the "mark" (Bible) which has led you astray through poor or deliberate translations?

How much more is this condemning "mark" when you take the word of God in vain and translate incorrectly, add, take away and re hash the true words and make it your own "mark"? Could this truly be the "Mark of the Beast"? All religions having denied the Towrah and original word of Yahowah and created their own words have made their mark and received and perpetrated the "mark" to decieve the whole world.

These days I'm thinking outside of the Christian box and it becomes easier to look back in and see all the filth and lies that I once believed. I also recall some adverts on TV that promoted "The Mark of a Man" it was all about men's perfume to make you smell good! If the mark of the Towrah is in a man, so much better!

Again, this is just my own thoughts, which may be off track, but the point is that this is food for thought! I am interested to hear what Yahowah has to say in His Towrah on these points to guide my thinking!

Maybe you have done this before in another program, but I don't know where to find it? An index of subject matter to your programs would be most beneficial so we can find subject matter!

If all goes well with you, you'll be able to sit back and, from Yahowah's home, watch those left behind deal with the Mark of the Beast, and not have to deal with it yourself. Ken Power, Yada's old business partner, wrote his thoughts on how it might be implemented during the last half of The Tribulation in Chapter 19 of his book which he now calls "The End of the Beginning". The cautions about Ken still believing that Paul can be reconciled to Yahowah's Word still apply. Fortunately that chapter seems to have minimal quoting of Paul in it, and most of the chapter is on the Mark of the Beast. So if you want to read Ken's thoughts on what it may look like to those who get left behind on the ultimate Yom Teruah, here is Chapter 19 of Ken's book. If all goes well, it will be moot for all of us.