Phobos and related Greek words used to denote fear/reverence imply a range of emotions based on what we perceive to be the connection between the one who causes phobos and the one experiencing it. The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament states: "Expressions containing words of the φόβος group always describe a reaction to man’s encounter with force. The scale of reactions ranges from spontaneous terror and anxiety to honour and respect, which already presupposes mastery of the experience through reflection. Hence evaluation of the reaction of fear is closely bound up with the understanding of one’s own existence."

It is therefore clear that some in the fledgling ekklesia felt "terrified," but others experienced reverence and awe for their God---the difference being what their relationship with Him was. Did they relate to Yahweh as a loving Father, or did they see Him as "merely" a powerful heavenly force who had to be appeased? The difference (as usual) is that of relationship vs. religion. Even at this early date, people of both mindsets---wheat and tares, if you will---populated the Church.

kp

No, Jeannie, but it did have to do with giving. The real message, however, was one rarely heard in American pulpits today: If you're giving something to be used in God's cause, but you're giving it to feel good about yourself, to fit in with your Christian friends, or to impress people with your altruism, then don't bother. God doesn't need your money.

kp