logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Scout  
#1 Posted : Sunday, March 30, 2008 12:50:51 PM(UTC)
Scout
Joined: 3/30/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2

This is my first post on this forum so I am not sure this is in the proper topic....I recently found this article refering to a book some academic has written about Jesus, I was wondering if anyone could read this and comment on the discrepencies it is quite stunning what these scholars come up with it seems as if these folks are suggesting the new testament is totally fabricated....

Jesus the Jew and the Christian cover-up

ALLAN LEVINE

Martin Levin

March 22, 2008

HOW JESUS BECAME CHRISTIAN

By Barrie A. Wilson

Random House Canada,

317 pages, $32.95
Print Edition - Section Front


The Globe and Mail

Forget about Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code and fictional conspiratorial machinations about whether Jesus and Mary Magdalene had children, Barrie Wilson has produced a significant and sensational work of scholarship. And it is truly religious dynamite.

Acknowledging Jesus's Jewish background is nothing new, but arguing, as Wilson does, that Christianity is largely the result of a deliberate and deceptive manipulation is more intriguing and contentious. "Jesus never converted to another religion," Wilson claims. "Nor did he start one. If he were to return, he'd probably be amazed - perhaps bewildered or possibly even angry - at what has been created in his name." Adding for good measure that, "of all the Jewish males who ever lived, Jesus was by far the most influential."

A professor of humanities and religious studies at York University in Toronto, Wilson has drawn on decades of his own research into the history of early Christianity and, like the superb teacher he must be, invites readers to accompany him on a wondrous journey back in time to understand Jesus's life, the ordeal of being a Jew in a world ruled by Romans, the construction of the New Testament, and the powerful forces that have transformed Western civilization.

Admittedly this is no easy task, but he pulls it off brilliantly. He is an academic who can write for a non-specialist audience and does so exceptionally well - guiding, explaining Scripture, and even creatively integrating imaginary newspaper columns and blogs into his prose. All of which brings Jesus and his epoch alive.

Using an array of biblical sources, both Jewish and Christian, he builds his case step by step, searching for clues in the Gospels, offering concise summaries, and posing difficult questions - many of which, he concedes, cannot be answered. We do not know, for example, the precise details of Jesus's day-to-day life - his emotional state or the real reasons he opposed Roman rule - and probably never will. But it is possible to offer reasonable and intelligent speculations based on solid research. That is what Wilson does very well, and by the last page he has convincingly made his case.

The short version of Wilson's thesis, which he calls the "Jesus Cover-Up Thesis," is this: The spiritual figure that billions of Christians worship worldwide as the Son of God was, in fact, a Jew, a rabbi, and a revered teacher of the early first century who obeyed and championed the Torah. Jesus (or more accurately in Hebrew, Yehoshua or Yeshu) prayed in synagogue and urged his followers to adhere strictly to Jewish law. Only in this way, he promised, would the Kingdom of God become a reality. Wilson probes the Jewish roots of the Lord's Prayer, the Sermon on the Mount and the Last Supper (which is more commonly recognized as a Passover seder, although there were likely many more people in attendance than the 12 disciples portrayed in Leonardo da Vinci's celebrated painting). In Wilson's view, Jesus wanted to improve Jewish life, not abolish it. He did not proclaim himself to be a "Christ" figure or a "Son of God." That came later.

Living as second-class citizens in their own country and dominated by a foreign power in Rome, Jews needed hope and Jesus provided it. His growing number of followers began to think of him as a "potential Messiah." Led by Jesus's brother, James - whose writings until recently have been largely ignored - these Jews established the "Jesus Movement." After Jesus was killed by the Romans, in about 30 AD, they waited for him to return to create the promised Kingdom of God.

With James's death in the early 60s, the Jesus Movement suffered a leadership crisis, and in Wilson's words, was eventually "upstaged" and "hijacked" by the Christ Movement launched by Paul of Tarsus, a Hellenized Jew living in the Jewish Diaspora. The two movements should have remained separate and parallel religious sects, but subsequent events changed this. Paul did not know Jesus, yet nevertheless linked him to the Christ Movement. In the process, he tore Jesus from his Jewish roots.

Wilson shows that the most significant development in this synthesis occurred 60 years after both James and Paul died and was accomplished by the unknown author of the Book of Acts (part of the Gospel of Luke). This new "take" on Jesus was so credible that, as Wilson puts it, "we tend to think of Paul's Movement as just another form of early Christianity. It wasn't. It was a brand-new religion entirely." It was thus what Wilson terms "Paulinity" - "a Hellenized religion about a Gentile Christ [and] a cosmic redeemer" - rather than the Jewish-inspired religion of Jesus, which was embraced by the Gentiles of the Roman world in the period from the second to the fourth centuries.

The New Testament is not a neutral document. The Gospels and other writings are arranged in a particular order to give weight to Paul's interpretation of the link between the Jesus and the Christ Movements. Moreover, it was not sufficient for authors of several Gospels to distance Christianity from Judaism, they had to vilify it: Jews became equated with Satan. According to Wilson, this made the cover-up complete. The devastating result was religious anti-Semitism and the perpetuation of the accusation that the Jews killed Christ.

In fact, it was only one Jewish sect, the Sadducees, who turned against Jesus. They wanted to maintain the status quo with the Romans and feared that Jesus's preaching about a Kingdom of God and altering the world was dangerous. Once the Romans accepted Christianity, it was not possible to blame them for Jesus's death, so the Jews were identified in the Gospels and later Church decrees as the true evil murderers of the Son of God. Centuries of persecution followed.

One major reason, Wilson notes, for the hostile reaction to The Da Vinci Code was "its suggestion that Jesus was human." And that criticism was levelled at a novel. Wilson's firm belief that Christianity must refocus on the human and Jewish Jesus and accept the truth of the cover-up is sure to generate an even greater controversy.

Winnipeg historian and writer Allan Levine is the author of, among other books, The Devil in Babylon: Fear of Progress and the Birth of Modern Life. His next book, Evil of the Age, beginning a new historical mystery series, will be published in May.

For Rex Weyler, that Jesus may have been an observant Jew whose Christianity was manufactured wouldn't make his message any less real. Or less Christian.

In The Jesus Sayings, Weyler, a respected Vancouver writer and co-founder of Greenpeace, works through the latest scholarship on Jesus to assess the meaning of his teachings. Having mastered the findings of the revisionist Jesus Seminar and examined the best historical evidence (Jesus never claimed to be the son of God), Weyler produces a Jesus far from that of the fundamentalists, family-values crowd and those who hold that since the end of days impends, the environment is not a real concern.

Weyler extracts a core message, largely culled from the Sermon on the Mount. He imagines a speech in Galilee, devoid of talk of miracles or the supernatural, by a "radical, Aramaic-speaking, Jewish Jesus." This Jesus defines the kingdom of God as within, adjuring his listeners not to love money, to accept "what is given to you from [our Father's] bounty and take care of others." Righteousness resides in generosity and high fellow feeling. Purity is not mere external ritual, but internal.

Finally, Weyler sees Jesus as the ultimate humanist, mirroring and bolstering his own faith.

Martin Levin



Related Reading

THE JESUS SAYINGS

The Quest for His Authentic Message

By Rex Weyler

Anansi, 392 pages, $29.95
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#2 Posted : Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:02:42 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Welcome Scout! Interesting find!

I would say that I would agree with some points in the summery above, although others are a little strange. I don't see anywhere the Messiah "opposing" the Roman rule. I think thats what some of the Isralites wanted at the time - someone to free them.

It seems, from first glance that the conclusions made by Mr Weyler are based only on what christians class as "new testament" scripture - and that it is the only place he has looked for any evidence. Mearly looking at this does not reveal what was going on - as Scripture is a much bigger document stretching from before the Messiah came. Looking at NT, and what seems to be errent current translations, only opens a small window into a world that does not make much sense. But in the light of all scripture, it fits together like beautiful Jigsaw.

It appears, and only appears because I have only read the above, that Mr Weylers studies are not extensive enough - they seem to pick little bits up, some of them correct, and miss too much for it to be accurate.

He also gets Yahushua's name wrong a few times :)

Like I said - just what I get from the above
Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline Truth Seeker  
#3 Posted : Sunday, March 30, 2008 3:45:27 PM(UTC)
Truth Seeker
Joined: 2/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 20
Man
Location: Wisconsin

I have mixed feelings about this book from what I have read in your summary.
It seems that the author is stressing the human side of Yahushua. The most important aspects for me would be his roles as Yahuah's Son and the Lamb that takes away the sin of the world(John 1:29). Maybe someone can correct me,but isn't the Jesus Seminar an organization of scholars that humanize Yahushua?

The topic of the order of the NT is interesting.I read a book by Ernest L. Martin that put forth an idea that the Gospels and Acts were originally followed by the Hebrew letters and followed up by the Pauline letters and Revelation. That's an interesting hypothesis.

I think that Paul is getting blamed for the "brand new religion". Will we ever know what the "Way" truly was before Constantine blended paganism with early Christianity?

From the summary I would have no interest in reading the book.
Offline Scout  
#4 Posted : Sunday, March 30, 2008 9:08:42 PM(UTC)
Scout
Joined: 3/30/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2

I don't know, this is a review by someone of a book...I take it to mean they want to render Jesus(sorry) just a regular guy, abeit he was a rabbi, a teacher still just a man...some Jewish guy posted this on another forum I was posting on, so I suspect it probably is a humanizing Jesus org...it seems to me they are saying the whole NT is a storybook of fables and that after his death a few of his devotees concocted the Son of God theory...anyway thans for your help...I was given this link as I was researching about Islam, and I clicked on the yada yahweh...very interesting...but you will have to bear with me as Jesus has been the name I have always used, I will have to work on Yahushua it takes some getting used to...old habits die hard...and mine are really really old.
Offline Robskiwarrior  
#5 Posted : Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:02:14 PM(UTC)
Robskiwarrior
Joined: 7/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,470
Man
Location: England

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Scout wrote:
I don't know, this is a review by someone of a book...I take it to mean they want to render Jesus(sorry) just a regular guy, abeit he was a rabbi, a teacher still just a man...some Jewish guy posted this on another forum I was posting on, so I suspect it probably is a humanizing Jesus org...it seems to me they are saying the whole NT is a storybook of fables and that after his death a few of his devotees concocted the Son of God theory...anyway thans for your help...


Well it does sound like something a traditional Jew would like, as it diverts from the facts.


Scout wrote:

I was given this link as I was researching about Islam, and I clicked on the yada yahweh...very interesting...but you will have to bear with me as Jesus has been the name I have always used, I will have to work on Yahushua it takes some getting used to...old habits die hard...and mine are really really old.


hehe don't you worry about us :) I was a Christian for 18 years before I had to get used to the Name Yahushua, so I understand what you mean, just take your time. Its all about the heart, and it looks like you are after the truth.

Welcome again, I hope you enjoy your time here :)

Signature Updated! Woo that was old...
Offline kp  
#6 Posted : Monday, March 31, 2008 4:12:53 AM(UTC)
kp
Joined: 6/28/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,030
Location: Palmyra, VA

More academic drivel designed to chip away at the truth that Yahshua is Yahweh in human form. Anybody who believes (as Wilson and Weyler both do) that "He [Yahshua] did not proclaim himself to be a 'Christ' figure or a 'Son of God.' That came later." is an idiot. Yahshua made claims that only God incarnate or a demented megalomaniac could make, and his actions prove He wasn't the latter. "Jesus" was not the "ultimate humanist." He was the Ultimate Human.

kp
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.