logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

8 Pages«<678
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline James  
#351 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:31:23 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
RT wrote:
There are many avenues to study the real and true history of Islam. You have provided an astounding one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr Bill Warner

Unitarians (a sect never to be mentioned without a special respect for their distinguished intellectual dignity and high intellectual honour) are often reformers by the accident that throws so many small sects into such an attitude. But there is nothing in the least liberal or akin to reform in the substitution of pure monotheism for the Trinity. The complex God of the Athanasian Creed may be an enigma for the intellect; but He is far less likely to gather the mystery and cruelty of a Sultan than the lonely god of Omar or Mahomet. The god who is a mere awful unity is not only a king but an Eastern king. The heart of humanity, especially of European humanity, is certainly much more satisfied by the strange hints and symbols that gather round the Trinitarian idea, the image of a council at which mercy pleads as well as justice, the conception of a sort of liberty and variety existing even in the inmost chamber of the world. For Western religion has always felt keenly the idea “it is not well for man to be alone.” The social instinct asserted itself everywhere as when the Eastern idea of hermits was practically expelled by the Western idea of monks. So even asceticism became brotherly; and the Trappists were sociable even when they were silent. If this love of a living complexity be our test, it is certainly healthier to have the Trinitarian religion than the Unitarian. For to us Trinitarians (if I may say it with reverence)–to us God Himself is a society. It is indeed a fathomless mystery of theology, and even if I were theologian enough to deal with it directly, it would not be relevant to do so here. Suffice it to say here that this triple enigma is as comforting as wine and open as an English fireside; that this thing that bewilders the intellect utterly quiets the heart: but out of the desert, from the dry places and, the dreadful suns, come the cruel children of the lonely God; the real Unitarians who with scimitar in hand have laid waste the world. For it is not well for God to be alone.

(Quote is taken from the article Allah and the Trinity) GK Chesterton


It’s amazing how ‘progressives’ act when confronted with the truth isn’t it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/...ands_Library_Papyrus_P52

Gospel of John 18:37-38 (verso)

ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΕΙΜΙ ΕΓΩ ΕΙΣ TOΥΤΟ ΓΕΓΕΝΝΗΜΑΙ
ΚΑΙ (ΕΙΣ ΤΟΥΤΟ) ΕΛΗΛΥΘΑ ΕΙΣ ΤΟΝ ΚΟΣΜΟΝ ΙΝΑ ΜΑΡΤY-
ΡΗΣΩ ΤΗ ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ ΠΑΣ Ο ΩΝ EΚ ΤΗΣ ΑΛΗΘΕI-
ΑΣ ΑΚΟΥΕΙ ΜΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΦΩΝΗΣ ΛΕΓΕΙ ΑΥΤΩ
Ο ΠΙΛΑΤΟΣ ΤΙ ΕΣΤΙΝ ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ ΚAΙ ΤΟΥΤO
ΕΙΠΩΝ ΠΑΛΙΝ ΕΞΗΛΘΕΝ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΙΟΥ-
ΔΑΙΟΥΣ ΚΑΙ ΛΕΓΕΙ ΑΥΤΟΙΣ ΕΓΩ ΟΥΔEΜΙΑΝ
ΕΥΡΙΣΚΩ ΕΝ ΑΥΤΩ ΑΙΤΙΑΝ
...
a King I am. For this I have been born
and (for this) I have come into the world so that I would
testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth
hears of me my voice." Said to him
Pilate, "What is truth?" and this
having said, again he went out unto the Jews
and said to them, "I find not one

fault in him."


Yada wrote:
I have just recently stumbled upon Bill Warner's outstanding website. It is interesting that he also recognizes that the Trinity is a hoax.

Yes there are many outstanding sites devoted to exposing and condemning Islam.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#352 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:03:33 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
C wrote:
I am a Muslim and this page that you have created is extremely offensive. You are completely ignorant about the greatness of the character of the Muhammad(S.A.W). A propaganda your site is which I am well aware, a Zionist propaganda I dare say. Furthermore I will like to elaborate on some of the blots you have pointed out in the character of Prophet Muhammad(S.AW). As you westerners usually cannot point a single blot on his character you call him a womanizer by saying he married so many wives. Well firstly I May enlighten you about the fact that in the Arabian Peninsula before the dawn of Muhammad women were treated as if property, new born girls were buried alive, step mothers could be legal wives, a man inherited his father's wives when he died. These are just some of the examples I have given you of the ignorance of Arabs before the dawn of Islam. Islam gave women rights, they had share in property, had right to education and so on. The Prophet(S.A.W) said "O people you have rights over your wives and they have rights over you, treat your wives with kindness. Verily, you have taken them on the security of Allah". Secondly I may point out to you that all the marriages that the Prophet (SAW) contracted during his lifetime except his marriage with Hazrat Khadija(A.S) served purely a political purpose, for the propagation of Islam and as gar as the Quran is concerned every revelation was revealed with a certain background without which the interpretation of that revelation os pointless. I do not wish to start a debate with you because your ignorance won't let you see anything other than what desire but as a Muslim I felt it as if my duty to speak against the disrespect of my leader.


Yada wrote:
To be a Muslim you must be either ignorant or irrational. The Qur'an by any rational standard is the worst book ever written and Muhammad was the most repulsive man whoever lived.

I agree that Prophet of Doom is extremely offensive. And the reason is obvious: the book provides the best documented, most comprehensive, contextual, and chronological presentation of Muhammad's words and deeds as they were made known through the five earliest and most reliable Islamic sources. And no man was more offensive than Muhammad.

In addition to being a womanizer, he was a pedophile, a rapist, and incestuous. But those were not his worst qualities. He was a mass murderer, a terrorist, a thief, a liar, a kidnapper, and a slave trader. To trust such a repulsive man with your soul is ignorant and irrational.

Since Arabic didn't become a written language until after the creation of Islam in the 7th century CE, nothing reliable is known about the societal conditions in Arabia that preceded it. Moreover, in Islam women remain property and they are treated like worthless animals. They can be beaten, starved, and killed by men under Sharia. So if your point is that this condition is similar to the previous condition, then that's a pretty pathetic argument on behalf of Muhammad.

Since you think that you are so smart and that I'm so ignorant, read Prophet of Doom and then send me another letter debating against the words and deeds of your pathetic wannabe prophet.

PoD
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#353 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:04:13 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
JM wrote:
Hello,

I've spent about an hour reading through your website. I wish I had more time.

I'm currently fighting my school district about lopsided curriculum in 7th grade World History... the pro Islam bias. I've presented reports from Gilbert Sewall, ACT! for America and other sources, about our biased textbook. I've complained about the project required in that section - students prepare a poster of Muslim / Islam achievements. After reading your site, I am not sure if these achievements are true ?

Finally, a video is shown for 2 days called 30 Days Muslim written by leftist Morgan Spurlock. I've requested the video be removed on the basis that many things are inaccurate in video including where a Muslim cleric says that Christians and Muslims believe in same God and that that God doesn't allow for consumption of alcohol. The superintendent refuses to pull video. Pastors in my area are unsure of answer. And they nor a rabbi are invited in the classroom to present their view of God.

I need something simple to understand to present to the Board of Education. I am not allotted a lot of time either. They truly want to paint me as an Islamaphobe. I don't care. I don't think showing how a religion is performed is allowed in a public school classroom?? Especially knowing now that it is a pagan religion.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Jenny McKeigue


Yada wrote:
Educators are mostly indoctrinators. They promote socialist secular humanism. Evidence and reason will thus be of no value. For those poisoned by political correctness exercising good judgment is considered wrong as it is intolerant. So you will be looked at as an enemy not Islam during any presentation before this board.

Allah is the opposite of Yahowah. The Qur'an is the opposite of the Towrah. Islam continues to be the most destructive dogma ever conceived by man. It is also the most murderous. These facts are irrefutable.

PoD
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#354 Posted : Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:17:28 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
J wrote:
Yada,

From today's show (21 mins.): Israel is the only nation where there is economic opportunity in the Islamic Middle East?

Wrong -- Jordan (#33) is more economically free than Israel (#51), according to the conservative Heritage Foundation's 2013 Index of Economic Freedom, and Israel is only just slightly ahead of Jamaica.

J


Yada wrote:
Typically the HF measures taxation and regulation as the means to quantify economic freedom. They are not measuring economic performance. I'm unaware of anything that has been invented in Jordan or is built there that has international merit and many things are invented and built in Israel.

Jordan's GDP per capita is $5,300 while Israel's is $31,000. And Israel's is depressed by the Muslim population. So it isn't close.

The only Islamic nations with a higher GDP per capita than Israel derive 90%+ of that revenue from oil.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#355 Posted : Tuesday, February 5, 2013 2:58:53 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
AA wrote:
Dear sirs,

I hereby request permission to translate and publish Prophet of Doom into the Icelandic language and sell it for a low price as an ebook in the Icelandic market.

My plan is to donate any profits of the sales of the book to Christian missionaries who are reaching out to muslims

I await your permission and contract draft for translation and publishing.

Sincerely yours,
AA


Yada wrote:
AA,

You have my permission to translate and publish Prophet of Doom in the Icelandic language and to sell it as an ebook. I would, however, prefer that the proceeds not be given to a Christian ministry or to any religious organization. Other than that, you are free to keep them or to invest them as you see fit.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#356 Posted : Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:03:01 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
J wrote:
Yada,

I'm two-thirds through the audiobook version of your book, Prophet of Doom, and the most important and potentially fatally damning things I've heard you raise is no mention of Allah in the Qur'an until later, and the gradual transition from Lord, to Rahman, and then to Allah, and the resemblance of the Hanif poetry to the first batch of suras.

One theme I've heard throughout your book is Muslim terrorists being behind 9/11, and I think that just like your subsequent research led you to abandon the claim that Christianity is valid, I think you'll find through further research that the Muslims orchestrated 9/11 claim also doesn't hold up, for several key reasons, including how was the pilot alleged to have flown into the Pentagon able to perform military manoevres when his flight school trainer said he could barely fly a small plane, or why there is no video from the airport that Atta was alleged to have departed from before hitting the WTC (the video presented is from Portland, not Logan), and why the video showing one of the alleged hijackers from Dulles has no camera ID, date or timestamp.

Not that some Muslims wouldn't have pulled off, or didn't participate in 9/11, but the question is, were they the masterminds, and I think further analysis will turn up some startling conclusions like you had concerning the New Testament.

J


Yada wrote:
J,

As a result of reviewing the evidence I am certain that Muslims acted like suicide bombers on 9.11.2001. There is no other informed and rational conclusion considering all of the facts available to us. The plan was conceived by Ramsi Yousef. It was staffed in the al Qod mosque in Germany.

I am a pilot, holding an ATP certificate, and I am type-rated to fly my own jet. While there is a lot to learn to take off and land a plane safely, monitoring all of the systems, while communicating with ATC, a child after playing with a video game could fly an already airborne plane into large buildings.

Most of the stuff you are quoting is promoted by conspiracy nuts. It isn't true. The airspace those planes flew threw and that controllers they conversed with is all well documented.

It does not take a mastermind to hijack an airplane or to be a suicide bomber. Moreover, the US government is way to incompetent to perpetrate and hide such a plan. Just look at the way they bungled the war on terror with their failed invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan - making both situations worse.

Since what happened and why it occurred is so obvious, I am perplexed that so many people ignore the facts to promote myths. And for what reason? There are far more important and readily provable reasons to distrust one's government and military.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#357 Posted : Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:06:02 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
EW wrote:
I have read PoD, I even printed it. I have also read Tea for Terrorists. I was not pleased with the answer given to my question about Muhammad. I understand that you are limited in time to answer. My question now is, does the site PoD have a section for questions and answers where certain confusing questions arise when studying Muhammad?
"A legendary king of the Britons (possibly based on a historical figure in the 6th century but the story has been retold too many times to be sure); said to have led the Knights of the Round Table at Camelot." Same question: Was King Arthur a real person?


Yada wrote:
POD is my answer to your questions. All of the evidence and reasoning I can provide is there for your consideration. If it was not sufficient, then there is nothing more I can add.

The reason I suggested reading the book is that based upon the suppositions you made in posing your questions, there were aspects of the evidence that you have yet to assimilate. Further, exposing the errors, modest as they may have been, in either fact or reasoning would have taken several hours and would not have been a productive use of my time - especially since all of those topics are already covered in the book.

The "was Muhammad a real person" argument is addressed in the Source Material appendix. I'm not sure it matters since so many people are influenced by what is said of him in the Qur'an and Hadith. And the argument that he never existed is impossible to prove and thus I consider it to be a poor use of anyone's time. In my view the only thing that matters is knowing what the oldest Islamic sources reveal regarding Muhammad - because those words and deeds serve as the basis of the most destructive and deadly religion ever conceived.

Even if we differ on Muhammad's motivations for perpetrating his demonic scheme, we are still left with a world haunted by the words and deeds attributed to him. While it is an interesting curiosity trying to figure out a person's motives for acting badly, in the end what matters is the crimes they perpetrated on others. In my view, the same issues surround Paul, the founder of the Christian religion.

Over the first five or six years of POD, we posted every question asked and every response. Then realizing that there was nothing new being discussed and way too much repetition, we culled the presentation and listed the emails that survived the cut by topic in the Feedback section. But we've added nothing over the past few years, focusing instead on An Intro to God, Yada Yah, and Questioning Paul.

We do not have a forum for POD. But we do have one for www.YadaYah.com. One of the discussion topics there is Islam. Our exchange may have even be posted there anonymously. And if so or if not, you can contribute to that section if you'd like.

PoD
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#358 Posted : Sunday, February 17, 2013 12:07:04 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
B wrote:
I was just recently referred to your website. As a Christian, I've read the Koran to see what it was about. Your website is fantastic! I've only read a few articles but they are well researched and strikingly revealing. I look forward to reading more and more. Keep up the good work!


Yada wrote:
I'd encourage you to read Prophet of Doom itself rather than the articles on the site. The book puts the Qur'an in chronological order and sets it into the context of Muhammad's life using the Hadith. The entire book is free in HTML, PDF, and MP3.

When you are done, since you are a Christian, I'd also encourage you to read www.QuestioningPaul.com.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#359 Posted : Monday, February 18, 2013 2:59:04 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
J wrote:
Yada,

I've listened to almost all of your audiobook for Prophet of Doom and I was wondering what you regard as the most important difference between Hisham's redacted version of ibn Ishaq's book, and what Tabari preserved?

Also, I was wondering what you speculate may have been the biggest details that are lost to us which Hisham alluded to in being embarrassing to Muhammad?

Thanks,

J


Yada wrote:
The story of the Satanic Verses is preserved by Tabari, but it's been such a long time since I compared them, I'd be guessing beyond that.

What is left in Hisham's biography is so repulsive it is nearly impossible to imagine what could have been worse. It still says that Muhammad was a rapist, pedophile, incestuous, womanizer, terrorist, mass murderer, thief, liar, slave trader, kidnapper, etc, so what crime didn't he commit?

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#360 Posted : Monday, February 18, 2013 3:03:47 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
G wrote:
Shalom,

Is Islam the Anti-Messiah?

Yada wrote:
No. Islam is anti Yahowah.



While there are many faces of evil, it helps to put each in their
proper perspective.

Yada wrote:
The best way to obtain the proper perspective on Islam is to study the Torah, Prophets, and Psalms and then compare what Yahowah revealed to what Allah/Muhammad claimed. When this is done, you will see Islam as anti Yahowah, anti Towrah, and thus synonymous with ha satan - the Adversary.


There is an interesting bit of information on the WND website
that I thought is worth mentioning. It is about identifying Islam
as the anti-messiah religion.

Yada wrote:
For that you have to turn to the Shi'ite mythology regarding the 12th imam. But none of that is in the Qur'an or Hadith. Moreover, the 12th Imam is Gog, not the Towrah-less One. He will probably have a Muslim father, a Catholic mother, and be a Socialist Secular Humanist.


Yet, there are some scriptural facts which omitted, so we
should ask - will there be a precursor to the anti-messiah?

Yada wrote:
There was, Nero. But Paul and Muhammad were also anti Ma'aseyah.


Yes! A greater evil that will make the anti-messiah look like
an angel of light and the Defeater of Islam! This would be the
perfect way to make the true anti-messiah appear as Messiah!

Yada wrote:
The Towrah-less One does not defeat Islam - Yahowah, Himself does that. Satan is a messenger of light. That is how he fooled Paul.


As I've said, Xtianity must fall, and be resurrected as a
"messianic" religion [temple/synagogue, Sabbath worship] etc.,
and it is this final religion which would be so much like the
real that if it were possible it could deceive the very elect.
That is not Islam!

Yada wrote:
Christianity is already fallen. It will not be resurrected. Yahowah hates religion. The Ma'aseyah was anti-religious. God hates the concept of worship too. It seems as if you want to exchange one false religion with another.


The cleansing of the temple mount and the rebuilding of
the last Temple is key to prophecy. However, the war which
precedes it is certain to be a war against Islam.

Yada wrote:
No it isn't. Yahowah is going to build it Himself when He returns on Yowm Kippurym in 6000 Yah. By the time it is rebuilt, He will have already returned.

The key to prophecy is 6+1+7, the pattern of the Miqra'ey.

Only one of the two Tribulation wars is against Islam.



It seems that the stage is being set for a pre-anti-messiah event
which will lead the world into darkness, only to make the anti-
messiah look like a shining angel of light.

Shalom,
G

Yada wrote:
The stage is being set for Yahowah's return, but I think you are far too concerned about the "anti-christ" and a potential predecessor. And the world's religions and political are regimes have long ago plunged the world into darkness. That is why we have to walk away from the world, from religion and politics, before we can participate in the covenant.

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#361 Posted : Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:17:30 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
JT wrote:
In your book, you quote extensively from the Haddith.



However, Muslims themselves cannot agree on what is legitimate Haddith.

For example, Sunni, Shia, and Ibadi apparently use different sets of Haddith collections.

Upon which set did you base your research? How did you decide which to use?

Also, one comment, if you don't mind. While I think your research has been excellent, I think the tone you have sometimes taken with those you are answering is often insulting.

I think you are more likely to sway muslims with a tone of love than one of insult. It may be true that Islam is foolish, dangerous, and false, (I agree that it is) but my opinion is that a more compassionate and loving tone in your Q/A section would go a long way.

I understand that people are making threats against your life, and that could make anyone edgy and bitter. Just a couple of words of advice. Hope you don't mind.

I have learned a lot from your material, and I appreciate your hard work.

Also, don't you think a lot of those threatening emails may have come from one or 2 people? They seem to all say basically the same thing with the same curse words and same spelling and grammatical errors. I have a hunch that a couple people sent a lot of them, pretending to be different folks. Just my hunch.

sincerely

JT


Yada wrote:
That really isn't true, JT. The four sources I cite are as credible as the Qur'an, and Muslims know this. They all come from the same person and they were passed along to us in exactly the same way. Moreover, every Hadith we have today has been screened and has survived because it was found to be in compliance with the Qur'an. Muslims just have a hard time with the Hadith with non-Muslims because by using them it Islam completely falls apart. Also, every early Islamic source, the Qur'an, Sira, Ta'rikh, Bukhari and Muslim were collected and compiled under Shi'ite regimes. And today, Sunnis value them even more than Shia.

Please read the the Source Material Appendix for specific answers to your questions. http://prophetofdoom.net...x_Islams_Dark_Past.Islam

No informed, honest, and rational person disputes the authenticity of the five sources I cited. They present 100% of what is known about Muhammad and the creation of Islam.

My intent was to be judgmental. I rather dislike lying, stealing, murder, rape, pedophilia, kidnapping, and the slave trade. It is a shame that so many people have been conditioned not to be judgmental.

I have no love for deception promoted in the name of God. I rather hate it. So I'm not going to pretend.

But no greater love can a person display than investing his or her time and risking his or her life to reveal the truth to someone whose life is being consumed by lies.

I am neither edgy or bitter. Hating Islam, and also Christianity, does not make me either. I am, however, judgmental, because it is the essence of reason, understanding, morality, logic, civility, and justice. We ought to care that 1.5 billion people are living in a hell Muhammad created and that many of them want to kill others based upon his lies. We ought to hate such a menace.

The emails all say the same thing because the come from those corrupted by the same religion.

I think you are on the right path as it comes to Islam, but I hope for your sake and others that you come to despise it and oppose it, and then that you invest the time to come to know the truth - to meet the God Allah was opposing.

PoD
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#362 Posted : Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:18:00 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
F wrote:
I do not want to be part of terrorism but I hate to watch what is going on in west bank. I am old UN soldier from Lebanon and i feel at I´m one part of best western military. Now I have seeing enough... I have beeing in Lebanon at second gulf war. How I can help west Bank people with my skills.......


Yada wrote:
Leave the UN. Denounce the UN. Learn all you can about the horrible menace that is Islam and what it does to destroy everything it touches. And then use your words, not weapons to oppose Islam on behalf of Yisra'el.

PoD
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#363 Posted : Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:01:27 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
HDB @6:48a.m. wrote:
BE A MAN IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. Before you listen to this whiner about Islam,
read the "jewish" talmud: http://talmudunmasked.com. "Jew" hate everybody
who's not a "jew". After they've had their buttboy - the U.S. military -
destroy all the Muslims, it'll be us Christians' turn.
http://truthmonger.info

______________________________________________________________________

May God bless you and yours,
HDB
(address and phone number omited)

Hey, this is what we'd be listening to if "jewish" record companies weren't
eliminating White Man's Rock: http://dogdown.net


HDB @9:02a.m. wrote:
Subject: Re: BE A MAN IF AT ALL POSSIBLE. Before you listen to this whiner about Islam, read the "jewish" talmud: http://talmudunmasked.com. "Jew" hate everybody who's not a "jew". After they've had their buttboy - the U.S. military - destroy all the Muslims, it'll


You are such an informed, reasonable, and articulate apologist for your religion, it's impossible to respond in kind.

Nicely done. I'm sure your proud of yourself.


HDB @9:31a.m. wrote:
May God bless,
DB
(address omited)

"JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONLY MESSIAH THE WORLD WILL EVER KNOW." - DB Ministries: http://truthmonger.info


Yada wrote:
HDB,

Why do you call yourself a "truth monger" when you are promoting that which is not true?

No one named "Jesus" is associated with God. The diminished manifestation of Yahowah is Yahowsha'. Yahowsha' means Yahowah Saves. This name was used 200 times in the Towrah, Prophets, and Psalms. "Jesus" was first used in the 17th century. It is errant and meaningless.

Christ isn't a name, much less a last name. It isn't even an accurate title. Yahowsha's title is Ma'aseyah. It means "Work of Yahowah."

God has a name. His one and only name is Yahowah. He used His name in His Torah, Prophets, and Psalms 7000 times. Why don't you know it or use it?

As few as one in a million people know that Yahowsha' is the Ma'aseyah. The path to this realization is unpopular.

It is amazing that you dislike Jews and yet don't seem to realize that Yahowsha' is a descendant of Ya'aqob. And since you don't like that sound, you probably wouldn't like heaven, where the only language is Hebrew.

As for hating on the Talmud, read www.YadaYah.com and www.IntroToGod.org. Prophet of Doom exposes and condemns Islam, but they expose and condemn Judaism and Christianity.

Be a real man and read them.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#364 Posted : Friday, April 19, 2013 3:03:17 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)


Yada wrote:
That may be the worst personal example of Islam I've ever seen. While it is far more likely that this was done by the jihadist rebels, since both sides are Muslims, the distinction does not matter.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#365 Posted : Monday, June 10, 2013 11:47:59 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
RM wrote:
Yada,
I enjoy your site POD and have cited much when speaking to others. However, I hit the brakes hard and credibility becomes an issue when I come across your contention Catholic lent is based on worship of Babylonian sun god. Do you have an angst against Catholicism? Please explain.


Yada wrote:
Lent is based upon the Babylonian weeping for Tammuz. So it is a pagan religious rite.

Yes, like Yahowah, I'm opposed to Catholicism and Christianity - in fact to all religions. According to Yahowah you cannot participate in the Covenant or be saved until you walk away from Babylon - aka religion.

Yada


RM wrote:
Scratch that request about Lent. I listened to 3 radio interviews you did and I've got a flavor for your mindset. You're an all-or-nothing-at-all guy.
I appreciate your knowledge and sincerity. However, Jesus said, “If you don't believe in me at least believe in the work that I do." With that said, Christmas is not celebrated to worship the sun god. Easter is not celebrated to worship fertility. The Master of the universe will hardly judge you harshly because the letter J made its way into the vernacular. I'm certain the Apostles would have said Jesus lived with us not tabernacled.
I make these remarks not to debate you, only to underscore the axiom not to bite off your nose to spite your face.
I've tried to learn the truth about Islam and in doing so I do not wish to accent my criticism with hyperbole and then not be taken seriously.
I have to assume your rhetorical style has permeated all of your writings. As such I will try to read carefully your conclusions. Islam is the enemy not the Catholic church.


Yada wrote:
Yep, It's Yahowah or nothing for me, but that is true for everyone.

There was no "Jesus." His name is Yahowsha'.

Yahowsha' never spoke any word similar to belief. And to know Him, you have to know who sent Him. Moreover, the work He did was all based upon the Torah.

You are clearly ignorant of the history of Christmas and Easter. And as a result, you don't answer Yahowah's invitations to meet with Him. And that means that according to God, by ignoring his Miqra'ey you cannot be saved. Sorry. Yahowah's testimony can be so irritating, at least for Christians. Feel free to ignore it. That is what freewill is all about.

So, in your estimation, since the letter J was invented in the 17th century I'm going to be judged and it's certain the Apostles would have said Jesus. And this underscored the axiom of not biting off one's nose. Logic like that is hard to refute. I'm glad this is not a debate.

Don't fret about being taken seriously. You have nothing worry about. And don't let my rhetorical style of using evidence and reason bother you lest it get in the way of your religious faith.

Islam is an enemy, but from Yahowah's perspective, so is the Catholic church. Most of what it teaches is inaccurate and misleading.

Nice chatting with you,

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#366 Posted : Monday, June 10, 2013 11:49:59 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
KB wrote:
Hi, Yada,

It’s been a while since I last contacted you. I trust you are well...

My question is...When were Hadiths actually written?
I am having a dispute with a Muslim who claims that the Hadiths can only be taken at face-value because “they were written ages after Muhammad’s death.” (His exact words)


Cordially,



KB

“The farther you travel, the less you know.”
Lao-Tzu


Yada wrote:
In reality, the hadith and qur'an came from the same source, cover the same material, and were retained the same way by the same people. If one is not valid, the other is invalid. The quran and hadith were both written down around 100 years after Muhammad's death.

Without the hadith there is no Islam.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#367 Posted : Monday, June 10, 2013 11:50:48 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
Okay so I normally remove the identifiable names and use initials but since there was no name here I just included the email.

8184317982@mymetropcs.com wrote:
You're misinformed buddy boy


Yada wrote:
So the best documented, most comprehensive, chronological, and contextual compilation of Islam's five oldest and most credible sources misinforms. That is news to me buddy boy. But thanks for the logical and informed insight.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#368 Posted : Monday, June 10, 2013 11:53:11 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
H wrote:
I can't believe you were stupid enough to make this page. Yet alone write these so called 'quotes'. Whoever you are, I'm guessing your atheist or a spastic Jew or Freemason who's part of the filthy rotary club. Have you ever thought about hell? I don't think you have because if you did, you'd be shivering , knowing your consequences. Your a useless human. I feel sorry for your parents. Your a waste of sperm. You know nothing of god or the prophet. You are a as useless as a speck of dust. Only dust has a purpose. You think your going to heaven? You think Jesus died for your sins. Who are you for him to die for? Your sins are your mistake. The punishment is yours. And you shall suffer. May you burn in the hottest depths of hell


Yada wrote:
Yep, I was stupid enough to convey what can be known about Muhammad, Allah, and Islam by compiling the best documented, most comprehensive, chronological, and contextual presentation of the five oldest and most credible Islamic sources. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Who would think that quoting Muhammad and Allah would be reasonable or rational. What was I thinking?

You must be thinking, because you aren't even guessing very well. Atheist - no, spastic - no, Jew - no, Freemason - no, Rotarian - no. Thought about hell - yes. It is called She'owl. You will find Allah there. But don't believe me - read the Qur'an.

I've accepted the terms of the Covenant, so I'm neither "shivering" nor concerned.

I can see why you'd view someone who exposes what can be known about Islam "useless."

Your rebuttal to POD is so stimulating and astute. You were obviously a stellar example of super sperm.

So in your mind, after compiling the most comprehensive book on the words and deeds of Muhammad as they are known to us through the oldest and most reliable Islamic sources I "know nothing of the Islamic god or prophet." If that were true, then both would be unknowable.

Nope, I don't think Jesus died for my sins. His name wasn't Jesus and God cannot die. As for heaven, I have an express ticket - the Torah.

Have you ever wondered why in the Qur'an Allah is always shown in Hell and that he seems to be enjoying torture? Sure sounds a lot like Satan to me.

Yada

Edited by user Monday, June 17, 2013 2:18:30 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#369 Posted : Monday, June 10, 2013 11:54:35 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
AV wrote:
I support islam and salafi.


Yada wrote:
As a good fundamentalist Muslim following Muhammad's example and orders, that would make you a jihadist, a bad person, and a fool. But to each is own.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#370 Posted : Monday, June 17, 2013 2:20:44 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
Okay going to do my best to keep these in some chronological order, but that doesn't mean they will make sense.

M wrote:
Was the Person on the Cross Really Jesus? http://www.answering-chr...who_was_on_the_cross.htm (Shared from UC Browser)


Yada wrote:
There was no person named "Jesus" or "Issa." And there was no "cross." So this is an ignorant question.


M wrote:
'll prove that bible is the great lie,it is blasphemy invented by paul the muderer of jesus follower.


Yada wrote:
You don't know enough to make such claims, M. Bible is an incorrect term in that it is based upon the name of an Egyptian goddess. Yahowah's term is Torah and Prophets.

If the Torah and Injil (an ignorant corruption of euangelion) are a lie, then Allah lied when he said that he inspired them and that they confirm his Qur'an. And since they are opposites, this fact alone proves that the Qur'an is a "great lie." Until you can deal with this fact, M, keep your foolish boasts to yourself.

Paul, whose actual name was Sha'uwl, was very much like Muhammad. Both were demon possessed by their own admission. Both spoke for Satan by their own admission. They were both false prophets and perverted individuals. And like Muhammad, Paulos / Sha'uwl was a murderer.

Since you weren't able to deal with the fact that there was no "Jesus" nor "Issa," nor even a "cross," and didn't respond to any of these facts, you have not earned the right to bring up an additional claim. By doing so, you have lost the debate.

Goodbye. Better luck next time.

Yada


W wrote:
esus in the Talmud:
Horrible Blasphemies Against Jesus Christ
While it is the standard disinformation practice of apologists for the Talmud to deny that it contains any scurrilous references to Jesus Christ, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations are more forthcoming and admit that the Talmud not only mentions Jesus but disparages him (as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak). These orthodox Jewish organizations make this admission perhaps out of the belief that Jewish supremacy is so well-established in the modern world that they need not concern themselves with adverse reactions.
For example, on the website of the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic Lubavitch group--one of the largest in the world--we find the following statement, complete with Talmudic citations:
"The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of 'Jesus the Nazarene':
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sa

I did not cut that off, that is how it came through in the email.

Yada wrote:
This is a complete fabrication. It's no better than the Qur'an. You will evidently believe anything.

By the way, idiot, since the letter J wasn't invented until the 17th century, the Talmud cannot speak about anyone named Jesus. Also, since you mentioned it, most of the Qur'an is a plagiarized and bastardized regurgitation of the Babylonian Talmud. So be careful what book you cite.

In that communicating with the senseless is senseless, this is my last response.

Yada


W wrote:
i only i know who ur and where u reside. I would have killed u then and there .which religion u follow and what u really know about islam.you bastard u. Dont deserve to live .we dont care about our live .


W wrote:
bastard yahda. Any answer


Yada wrote:
I learned long ago that trying to debate someone incapable of being rational was a waste of time. I responded to each of your initial statements, but since the answers could not be found by cutting and pasting, you ignored the challenge and went on to another ignorant and irrational claim. In the process you lost the debate and proved yourself worthless.

Worse, when you resorted to swearing and then threatened to kill me, you revealed how horribly your religion has scared you. By any reasonable standard, you are beyond hope. I've listed your address as Junk, which is an accurate accounting, so I will no longer be annoyed by your verbal diarrhea.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#371 Posted : Tuesday, December 3, 2013 10:01:57 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
Not a letter addressed to POD, but i thought the topic made it fit better here.

B wrote:
Dear Yada,
I've been researching and trying to find the true path to God for years and came across the YadaYahweh website late last year. I have found it to be a highly comprehensive source on many Scriptural topics and I thank you for the work you have done with it. Anyway, I thought I was beginning to get on firm ground with regards to my beliefs and then realized the importance of testing things and making sure my beliefs were grounded in truth and facts, as Intro to God and the rest of YadaYahweh emphasizes. I then set out to address Islam and test it to make sure it was not the true path to God. I am not a Muslim, but feel the need to answer their alleged proofs. This task has lead me into a deep depression and I am asking for your help addressing some of the proofs presented by Muslims in favor of their religion. I understand you have found Islam to be a false religion (Prophet of Doom).
One claim by Muslims that I have been unable to refute is the mathematical Quran code. Essentially, it states that the entire Quran is mathematically structured and specifically based on the number 19. This idea originated from Rashad Khalifa in the 80s but has since been modernized. A complex and obscure new book that can be freely downloaded at http://www.realquran.net/resources creates a compelling case for the "19" theory. http://www.submission.org/ is also another compelling website on these issues. In Quran 74:30-31, the number 19 is, apparently, said to be the number of angels guarding hell and their number exists to test the unbeliever and confirm what the believer knows. A quick Youtube or Google search will also reveal many other alleged numeric miracles, but the "Unlocking the Quran Code" book is my primary concern. The evidence is presents is highly compelling and complex (and very lengthy) and I have no good answer for it. If this numeric evidence is correct, does that mean the Quran has some kind of divine/supernatural influence, and why or why not? It doesn't seem we can simply dismiss all of this numeric evidence as coincidence. I've found several answerers and rebuttals to the "19" theory, but none seem very thorough or deal with the modern evidence put forth in this book. I'm not sure that the argument. "Well we can make many sentences equal 19 in numeric value" or "All books have some pattern" is an adequate rebuttal. This seem to be a very thorough pattern.
My second question is in relation as to why Muhammad and the Quran cannot be true. Is it basically because it adds and takes away from the laws in the Torah or are there other reasons? Muslims typically claim that the Torah/Tanakh are corrupt, how do we know they are not? We can look at the Dead Sea Scrolls and the later texts from the time of Muhammad and see that there isn't really a drastic difference, but how can we be assured the Torah/Tanakh wasn't corrupted between its authorship and the time of the DSS? That is a time ranging from a few hundred to 1000+ years in which we don't the status of the Torah. How can we know the authors of the individual books are correct? Some will even claim that Ezra "found the Torah", which had been lost and was then rewritten. Muslims claim that the commandments of Torah were only for a specific people, Yehoshua was sent only to Israel, and Muhammad gave God's final revelation. They may even claim the original Torah gave commands that are in the Quran, such as forbidding alcohol and music. What is our best proof that the Torah and Tanakh is the actual word of God?
These are the primary concerns I have and feel compelled to address, especially the numeric argument set forth in the above book. As I've mentioned, I grown profoundly depressed trying to get to the bottom of things. I feel like every time I think I've got the truth, someone comes along and writes a refutation. One thing is always one way, then its the other. I don't mean to sound overly dramatic, but I don't really even enjoy life anymore because of my frustrations related to my research. So I'm sincerely seeking your help. I'm tired of getting half-baked answers and feel the need to come up with a legitimate response to the accusations of critics (such as Muslims). I am not trying to advocate Islam, but I'm 19 years old and very confused on these issues and any of your scholarly help/advice would be greatly appreciated. I feel like I could spend my entire life in this state of uncertainty and never get to the bottom of things.
Thank you for your time,
B


Yada wrote:
B,

There are numerical patterns most everywhere, but they don't prove anything. The oldest versions of the Qur'an are not even numbered, not chapters or verses, so there is no substance to this. Moreover, the issue with the Qur'an is that it is by any rational standard the worst book ever written. It is internally contradictory and errant historically and scientifically, but the fact that it is grossly immoral is the biggest issue. So this argument aims to direct a reader's attention from the message, from the words themselves, which is obviously false. For it to have been inspired, its god would have to be dumber than a stone.

The DSS demonstrate that the Towrah has been retained fairly accurately. And since the Qur'an is the antithesis of the Towrah, there is no set of circumstances that would enable the Towrah, no matter how much it was supposedly altered, to be the same as the Qur'an. This may be the most ignorant and irrational argument ever, because the truth proves that the foundation of Islam is a lie.

If Prophet of Doom was insufficient to demonstrate to you that the Qur'an is a complete fraud, I don't know what else to say. And as for trying to verify the truth, there is no reason to look beyond the Towrah. Closely examine and carefully consider Yahowah's Word and the words of men won't trouble you.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#372 Posted : Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:57:56 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
J wrote:
How is that the Yahowah allows all Muslims to go to hell or be annihilated? Are there not some Muslims would have dedicated their whole lives to serving who they think is God?


Yada wrote:
Allah is Satan. The Qur'an is a declaration of war against Yahowah's Chosen People. Muslims are Yisra'el's most vicious enemy. Everything the Qur'an says is false.
Yahowah isn't interested in us devoting our lives to Him, and especially not interested in someone devoting their life to a religion or its false god.Yahowah wants to have a relationship where both parties contribute and both parties benefit. So it is devotion to the Covenant relationship that matters. Muslims and Christians know nothing of this.

Yahowah provided specific instructions on how to engage in the Covenant. He then personally enabled His plan. If He were to say that you can be ignorant of His plan and provision, even hostile to it, and still be saved, Heaven would be no different than the hell religions create on earth.
Yada


J wrote:
Well said.

But the nagging question in my mind is what if millions of Muslims never heard about the covenant?

What if their leaders brainwashed them into serving a whole life the best way to a new how?

Isn't there some way or someone who can reach those people and give them the opportunity to repent and serve the true Yahowah God with relationship and intimacy?

Wouldn't it be sadistic if people who never asked to be created were tortured for eternity just for following false doctrines of the Muslim leaders in Muslim countries where they never heard the truth?


Yada wrote:
J,

That is why Yahowah told us that when fathers corrupt their children, they brainwash them for generations. There is a consequence of religion. It not only deceives, it precludes the truth from being known. That is why Yahowah hates religion. And that is why those who promote religion go to She'owl while those victimized by it simply cease to exist.
According to Yahowah "ignorance = death and destruction" not eternal separation.
Repenting isn't part of Yahowah's vocabulary. But He did ask me and help me write Prophet of Doom. Consider it Yahowah's gift to Muslims. And then there is An Introduction to God, which collectively provide everything that is needed to take Muslims away from Islam and to the Covenant. But remember, the exact same problem exists for all Christians.
Those who follow religions do not go to She'owl, so your proposition isn't valid. And those who promote religion do so much harm that they must be held accountable for Yahowah to be just. However, even they are not tortured. There is no torture in She'owl - only eternal separation.
Yahowah has no interest in saving everyone. His interest is in having those who are interested in participating in the Covenant act upon its terms and conditions so that He can provide His children with its benefits. And there is only one place where the conditions of Covenant participation are presented - the Towrah.
There are more smart phones with internet access on the planet today then there are people, over 7 billion active devices and plans. So there is no excuse for not knowing.
Please call into the show today during the second or third hours (1-3 PM EST) at 877-300-7645 and we can discuss this further.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#373 Posted : Sunday, April 13, 2014 10:52:45 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
M wrote:
Hello.... I notice that 'prophetofdoom' your website with translations of the Quran and essays and commentary are no longer appearing on the web?
I hope you haven't abandoned the site, that would be a loss.

M


Yada wrote:
Muslims attack it constantly making it too expensive to maintain. We may find a solution, but even that requires time and money. We may find a resolution, but, even then, it may not last.

Yada


M wrote:
ah... so that's it.
I notice the other sites I follow, jihadwatch, pamelageller, andrewbostom, are all attacked similarly.
I hope you find solution. Perhaps you might contact Robert Spencer, at Jihadwatch and ask him what measures he's taken to avoid being taken down. I note his site is taken down for a few hours but it's back up.
It's a sign of what your words and work are worth.

Here I am, a Jew right before Pesach, and this week what did Brandeis U, do when they took away the award to Ayaan Hirsi Ali at the demands of CAIR.... they voted for slavery, instead of freedom... sigh

M


Yada wrote:
M,

I covered the Ali story during my Shattering Myths radio show a few days ago. It wasn't CAIR's most diabolical act of the week, however. The issue of female genital mutilation is one Muslims don't want known because they have maimed 125 million little girls. The best on the subject is IQ al Rasouli, and last Friday in my first hour he and I detailed CAIR's support of sexual abuse. It's worth a listen at GCNLive.com

Unlike JW, I don't make a living selling books, so I'm not willing to pay for the software to thwart denial of service attacks. And, honestly, Islam no longer consumes my attention. There are many other deceptive, destructive and deadly institutions worth exposing and condemning.

If you are Jewish by race, not religion, and are both open minded and receptive to evidence and reason, my other books should be of interest to you: www.YadaYah.com, www.IntroToGod.org, and www.QuestioningPaul.com.

I've attached an unpublished review of what Yahowah revealed to Yasha'yah regarding the consequence of the Syrian War. He has a lot to say about the future of Yisra'el and Yahuwdym. It's not a pretty picture, but it's always better to be informed and prepared.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#374 Posted : Tuesday, April 15, 2014 3:16:25 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
R wrote:
Has the site been hacked?
Have a happy Pesach
R


Yada wrote:
Yes, and so often it is becoming a real burden. It may become a lost cause due to the cost of maintaining it.

Fortunately, there are better things to do, like enjoy Pesach.

Yada


R wrote:
What a shame if POD goes. I refer people to it frequently in my practice and I’m sure it has opened many eyes. I looked for a mirror but couldn’t find one. I suppose any mirror would be hacked or bombed by the living dead anyway. Unfortunately with computer programming I’m a bit like a woman only driving her car every sungod day to circe to pray. She can drive the car but doesn’t know how it works (and the same goes for her religion). I couldn’t mirror the site anyway with my clunky computer and an ADSL line. However I could distribute the material if it were in the form of a DVD or CD as I come in contact with a large number of people most days. Is it possible to put the whole site with navigation buttons on a DVD? If you can, my address is: ---. I could then distribute it like the old soviet samizdats and keep the information out there.


Yada wrote:
R, the site construction and navigation are robust, as you have surmised. My friend Yow'el dedicated the time and expertise to empower it. And one day, he may restore it.

The site isn't available on a DVD, but we appreciate your offer.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#375 Posted : Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:59:37 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
J wrote:
Hey Yada,

Im not positive if you're still confused as to why the media etc are using fake beheading videos to justify their actions when there are countless real ones but I think I've figured it out... You mentioned the reason why you knew the recent beheading videos receiving tons of attention were not like the others because in all of the real ones they would be quoting from the Quran and Hadith and yellin Allahu Akbar..... <<--- This is the reason why they are using fake beheading videos. They don't EVER want the Islamic scriptures being read aloud... or seen... etc on major media... especially not millions or billions of times over like the media is doing with these fake beheading videos!!! If they wanted people to know what was contained in the Quran and Hadith they could have just read from them a long time ago and exposed Islam for what it is but they never have and they never willl... Exposing Islam for what it is is not part of the agenda! I hope that you enjoy and agree with my conclusions on this I was seriously wracking my brain... Like why? Why use fake videos when theres tons of real ones??? lol... Thanks for your time and if you agree with my finding then please please relay them to your audience on Shattering Myths

Thanks again,

J


Yada wrote:
JA,

This is an interesting conclusion. And there is no question that the US has used the fake beheadings to justify a war against a "non Islamic" Islamic State. So we are nostril deep in lies.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 11/5/2016(UTC)
Offline Sarah  
#376 Posted : Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:26:56 AM(UTC)
Sarah
Joined: 11/4/2012(UTC)
Posts: 103
Location: Colorado

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I am wondering: Does anyone know for sure if the journalists are really dead or not?
Offline James  
#377 Posted : Tuesday, October 7, 2014 7:10:01 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
LS wrote:
Shalom,

THE JEWISH RABBI WHO CREATED ISLAM

JEWISHENCYCLOPEDIA

The unedited full-text of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia

SCHWARZ, JOSEPH:

Palestinian geographer; born at Flosz, Bavaria, Oct. 22, 1804; died at Jerusalem
Feb. 5, 1865. When he was seventeen years old he graduated as teacher
from the Königliches Schullehrerseminar of Colberg, after which he joined his brother Israel at the University of Würzburg, where for five years he devoted himself to the history and geography of the Holy Land, and published a map of Palestine (1829; republished at Vienna, 1831, and Triest, 1832). It was his ardent desire, however, to study in Palestine itself the physical history and geography of the Holy Land, where his knowledge of Talmudic sources and early Jewish writers would be of more service. Accordingly he decided to settle in Jerusalem, whither he went in 1833. Schwarz then began a series of journeys and explorations in various parts of Palestine, to which he devoted about fifteen years.

The results of his investigations and researches into the history, geography, geology, fauna, and flora of that country have placed him in the front rank of Palestinian explorers and geographers. HE IS THE GREATEST JEWISH AUTHORITY ON PALESTINIAN MATTERS SINCE ESTORI FARHI (1282-1357), the author of "Kaftor wa-Feraḥ."



(Be sure to Google this article)

HISTORY OF PALESTINE

614-1096 C.E.

From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.


By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850

Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, aka Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, Abu Bakr, the first Caliph, was in fact: [A JEWISH RABBI] Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl (A 6 YEAR OLD CHILD), for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally:


The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.


THE BETRAYAL

[Why Muhammad hated alcohol]

Abu Bachr and Aliman now resolved among themselves to remove the dangerous enemy of the Jews, Bucheran. One evening Mahomed, Bucheran, Aliman, and Abu Bachr, were drinking together; the latter two soon saw that Mahomed and the astrologer were strongly intoxicated, and lay stretched out in a deep and profound sleep. Abu Bachr thereupon drew the sword of Mahomed from its scabbard, cut off therewith Bucharan's head, and put the bloody sword back into its receptacle, and both then lay themselves down quietly near Mahomed to sleep. When Mahomed awoke and saw his friend lying decapitated near him, he cried out in a fury: "This terrible deed has been done by one of us three in our drunkenness!" Abu Bachr thereupon said quite unconcernedly: "Let each one draw his sword, and he whose weapon is stained with blood, must needs be the murderer!" They all drew their swords, and that of Mahomed was completely dyed with fresh blood, which proved thus clearly to his satisfaction that he had murdered his friend. He was greatly grieved at this discovery; cursed and condemned the wine which was the cause of this murder, and swore that he never would drink any more, and that also no one should do so who wishes to enter heaven. This is the cause why wine is prohibited to the Mahomedans.

At a later period, Mahomed learned the whole transaction, and that his father-in-law was the perpetrator of the bloody deed; wherefore, he lost his favour, and he would not permit him to come before him. Abu Bachr went thereupon and conquered sixty places, which had not yet submitted to Mahomed, and presented them to him, through which means he became again reconciled to him, was received in favour, and remained thereafter at court.




LS


Yada wrote:
It's borderline insane.


LS wrote:
NO!

YOU ARE FUCKING INSANE!

THE JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA 1906 GIVES HIS CREDENTIALS AND THE:

Jewish-American History Documentation Foundation
P.O. Box 760325
Lathrup Village, MI 48076

GIVES HIS DOCUMENTS!

NOW FUCK OFF, YOU IDIOT!

Descriptive Geography and Brief Historical Sketch of Palestine

By Rabbi Joseph Schwarz, 1850

History of Palestine: 614-1096 C.E.

From the Accession of the Mahomedans to that of the Europeans.

In the year 4374* (614) there lived in Medina, in Arabia, Mahomed ibn Abdallah, descended from Keder, son of Ishmael (Gen. 25:13), who had taken possession of Arabia and the neighbouring countries. Mahomed had two secret counsellors, who assisted him in the construction of his new system of doctrines and belief; these were Allman Mam Ali, of Jewish descent, and Turchman, a Christian; hence it resulted that the Koran contains many rules bearing analogy to Jewish ideas, for they were derived from Mam Ali.

* It is not easy to give the precise year of the Chadjra (the flight of Mahomed), since all authorities are not agreed in this respect. In general, the year of the text is assumed. In a Hebrew work, out of which I have drawn largely, the year 4384 (621) is given. The Mahomedans reckon this year 5605 (1845) as the 1261st of the Chadjra. If we now calculate their years in general at 355 days, as they have no leap year, we shall have only about 1226 solar years, which would give us the year 4379 (619 of the Christian Era) as the year of the Chadjra.

Mahomed had an astrologer at his court called Bucheran, who was a very great enemy of the Jews, and urged the prophet constantly to persecute and exterminate them entirely, so that Mahomed at length listened to the proposition, since he had without this already a hatred towards them, because they had not aided him in his campaigns according to his expectation; wherefore the whole Jewish population under his rule, ran great danger of being entirely cut off. Rabbi Shallum, son of the then Resh Gelutha, in Babel, perceiving this dreadful predicament, went to Mahomed, and offering him his submission, friendship, and services, endeavoured to enter with him into a friendly compact. Mahomed accepted his proposition with pleasure, conceived a great affection for him, and took his daughter, a handsome young girl, for wife; he made him also a general in his army, and gave him the name of Abu Bachr al Chaliva al Zadik, literally: The father of the maiden, the descendant of the righteous; this means, that of all his wives, who were either widows or divorced women, this one was the only one who had never been married before, and then she was the granddaughter of the celebrated chief of the captivity; therefore, the descendant of the righteous. This occurrence induced Mahomed to give up his terrible intention to destroy the Jews in his country, and thus did Rabbi Shallum save his people.

Abu Bachr and Aliman now resolved among themselves to remove the dangerous enemy of the Jews, Bucheran. One evening Mahomed, Bucheran, Aliman, and Abu Bachr, were drinking together; the latter two soon saw that Mahomed and the astrologer were strongly intoxicated, and lay stretched out in a deep and profound sleep. Abu Bachr thereupon drew the sword of Mahomed from its scabbard, cut off therewith Bucharan's head, and put the bloody sword back into its receptacle, and both then lay themselves down quietly near Mahomed to sleep. When Mahomed awoke and saw his friend lying decapitated near him, he cried out in a fury: "This terrible deed has been done by one of us three in our drunkenness!" Abu Bachr thereupon said quite unconcernedly: "Let each one draw his sword, and he whose weapon is stained with blood, must needs be the murderer!" They all drew their swords, and that of Mahomed was completely dyed with fresh blood, which proved thus clearly to his satisfaction that he had murdered his friend. He was greatly grieved at this discovery; cursed and condemned the wine which was the cause of this murder, and swore that he never would drink any more, and that also no one should do so who wishes to enter heaven. This is the cause why wine is prohibited to the Mahomedans.

At a later period, Mahomed learned the whole transaction, and that his father-in-law was the perpetrator of the bloody deed; wherefore, he lost his favour, and he would not permit him to come before him. Abu Bachr went thereupon and conquered sixty places, which had not yet submitted to Mahomed, and presented them to him, through which means he became again reconciled to him, was received in favour, and remained thereafter at court.

Mahomed urged his conquests to the north and west; made war against Heraclius and his son Constantine, captured the country around Antiochia, Armenia, a part of Asia Minor (Anatolia), and Palestine. Jerusalem, however, continued in possession of the Greeks. Mahomed reigned 11 years, and died in 4385 (625); he was succeeded by his father-in-law, Abu Bachr, but he survived him but two years, when he also died.

In 4387 (627), another father-in-law, Omar ibn Kataf, ascended the throne. In the tenth year of his reign (4397) he appeared before Jerusalem with a large army. He besieged it, and after producing great distress thereby in the city, it surrendered to his arms. He then made a treaty with the Greek inhabitants of the city, that they should pay him a ransom for their lives, and send an annual tribute. He commanded to rebuild the temple, and appropriated several pieces of ground, the proceeds of which were destined to defray the expenses and keep it in repair, which is continued to be done to this day. He built, accordingly, the great Mosque al Sachara [Dome of the Rock], of which I have spoken above. He also conquered the whole country around Damascus and Ispahan, which is a part of Persia.

Egypt was taken by his general Omar ibn Aleaz, as also the city of Alexandria, where he burnt the celebrated library, through which learned posterity suffered an irreparable loss. This conquest of Egypt put an end to the government of the Mameluks, and it came under the rule of the Califs, and so it remained till the country was conquered by the Tartars in 4502 (742). In 4400 (640), Omar built the present al Mazr and called it Al Kairo, which means, "care, pains, sorrow;" since this building cost him much trouble, care, and labour. In the town of Pastat, the ancient Zoar (for which see the Appendix), he prohibited and prevented a terrible ancient custom, which was prevalent among the Greeks of that place. They used, on the day when the Nile begins to rise, to take a handsome young woman, to dress her in the most costly and brilliant attire, to lead her to the river under accompaniment of music and dancing, and then to throw her into the water; since, according to their opinion, the Nile would, in reward for this beautiful sacrifice, rise higher and higher, and scatter its rich blessings over the land. Omar reigned 15 years.

In the year 4402 (642), Osman (or Othman) ibn Afan assumed the government. He was a son-in-law of Mahomed. In the year 4406 (646), he took the island of Rhodes, and in 4413 (603) the island of Cyprus, from the Greeks.

In 4413 (653), the Calif Ali ibn Abu Talbih, also a son-in-law of Mahomed, who had slain his predecessor Osman, succeeded to the throne. The Persians, and many other Mahomedans, regard this Ali also as a prophet, equal to Mahomed. Even at the present day there are two sects of Mahomedans; one is composed of those who only believe in and acknowledge Mahomed as a prophet [Sunni], and the other of those who ascribe the same honour to Ali [Shia]. These two sects always are inimical towards, and persecute each other. In Syria and on the Lebanon there are likewise several Mahomedans who belong to the sect of Ali.--Under him the Mahomedans conquered the whole of Anatolia, and penetrated as far as Africa and Spain. He was succeeded, in 4419 (659), by his son, Calif Chazan ibn Ali.

Calif Maevia ibn Sefian began his reign in 4434 (674). Under him there were constant wars and contests among the great men of the state, concerning the califate, and it was always doubtful whether he should be able to maintain himself on the throne or not.

In 4435, Calif Abd al Maleki assumed the government. He made a treaty with the Greek Emperor of Constantinople, Justinian II. He built the city of Ramla, and several other towns in that neighbourhood. The district of Abu Gosh (see above, Kirjath-Jearim), is to this day called Belad Beni Amaleki, perhaps in allusion to this Calif. In his time, in 4459 (699), there ruled in Iraq and Babel yet another Calif, Chadjadj ibn Jusif. Abd al Maleki was succeeded in 4467 (707) by his son, Calif Walid I., ibn Abd al Maleki.

In 4502 (742), the country was invaded by innumerable hordes of Tartars, from the vicinity of the Caspian Sea. They were called Turkemans ; hence the name of Turks. These conquered the whole of Syria, Cappadocia, and Palestine, and caused everywhere terrible devastations. The Arab Califs made war against them, and drove them out of the country; they, however, came back a third time, as I shall relate hereafter, till at length the Arabs and Turks became united, by the latter assuming the Koran and the Mahomedan religion, and formed, as at this day, but one nation, only that the former are called Arabs or Ishmaelites, and constitute the greater portion of the inhabitants of Palestine; whilst of the others, called Turks, but few are in our country, whereas in Turkey, in Europe, the population is mostly composed of them.

In 4523 (763), there reigned the Calif Al Mansur, who built Bagdad, the modern Babylon.

In 4546 (786), the Calif Harun al Rashid (i.e. the just) became ruler, and reigned till 4569 (809). He completed the building of the city of Baghdad, commenced by Al Mansur. In 4557 (797) there arose a terrible war between the Saracens and the Arabic tribes in Palestine, through which means Gaza, Ashkelon, Sarifea צריפין and Beth-Gubrin were entirely destroyed.

In 4572 (812), the Mahomedans attacked and slew the ecclesiastical chiefs of the Christians in Jerusalem.

In the year 4573 (813), ruled Calif Almamans ibn Harun, until the year 4603 (843).

In 4628 (868), there reigned Sultan Ibn Achmad ibn Tulun over Egypt. In that year the Tartaric hordes made another irruption, and conquered Palestine and Egypt. Sultan Ibn Achmad had constant wars with them: he reigned till 4644 (884).

In 4729 (969), there reigned the Calif Ma'ez, of the Fatimite family. This name was borne by the Califs of Kairuan, a country to the west of Egypt, in the neighbourhood where Carthage formerly stood (see Appendix). He conquered Egypt, Palestine, and Syria, and had his seat in Cairo (Al Mazr).

Calif Al Chakim, the third of the Fatimite family, became sovereign in the year 4756 (996). He was a great enemy to the Christians, and persecuted them everywhere.

In the year 4776 (1016), he advanced with a large army against Jerusalem, and drove away the Tartars, who yet occupied the same. He also destroyed totally the church which Constantine had built over the so­called place of Jesus’s sepulchre. His reign extended till 4781 (1021).

The pilgrims who came from the west (Europe) to Palestine, and beheld these persecutions, painted them in strong and glaring colours on their return to their native countries, and moreover calumniated the Jews, as though these had contributed much to produce the enmity and persecution of the Christians on the part of Al Chakim. These and still other falsehoods and calumnies increased the hatred and the persecution towards the Jews in European countries; and when at a later period the pious crusaders from the west went eastward, to snatch the Holy Land from the power of the Mahomedans, they found ample opportunity to execute a pious and holy vengeance on these poor Israelites, as I shall relate somewhat more circumstantially hereafter.

In 4781 (1021), his son Calif Dahir ibn Chakim became sovereign. He was a friend to the Christians, and permitted them to rebuild their destroyed church.

In 4800 (1040), the Tartaric hordes made a third irruption under their leader Seldjuk, who was of the tribe Hildokiao. This chief was uncommonly successful in his conquests: he made war against the Egyptian Calif, and conquered Syria, and Jerusalem with its environs. He bitterly persecuted the Christians in the Holy City, and they had to endure terrible exactions, and were compelled to submit entirely to his arbitrary will.

In 4859 (1099), the Arabs under the Egyptian Calif again acquired Jerusalem and the surrounding country, and drove the Tartars away from there, and thought themselves secure in possession of the city, when suddenly a new enemy came over them, with whom they had to wage a long and bloody strife. This enemy was the Europeans of the West, who in that very year entered the land of Palestine and conquered it.

A Short Review Of This Period.

There exist but few documents concerning the situation of the Jewish literati and literature in Palestine of this period. But at the time of Mahomed, the most distinguished and learned person amongst the Jews, Rabbi Yizchak Ha-Gaon, resided in Babylon. The title of Nahssi had at that time been given up for that of Gaon.

In 4521 (761), there arose a serious contest in Babylon between the Resh Gelutha, and the celebrated Rab Acha, of Shabecheh, the author of the She'elthoth שאלתות through which cause the latter was not chosen as Gaön, wherefore he quitted Babylon and repaired to Palestine, where he ended his days.

In 4543 (733), there lived in Beth-Zur, a town not far from Hebron, a man by the name of 'Anan ענן a scholar of the then Gaon, Rabbi Yehudai, of Babylon. He had observed in his scholar that he had neither affection for, nor faith in our tradition as an exposition of the written law; wherefore he ('Anan) could not be chosen either as Resh Gelutha or Gaon. He returned, therefore, to his native country, Palestine, and formed a new sect, the leader of which he became, by openly preaching against our system of tradition. The sect of the Sadducees, who only adopted the written law and rejected the tradition, had gradually fallen entirely into decay after the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem, and had become nearly dissolved. But the appearance of 'Anan gave them new life, and they soon increased and spread extensively in Palestine, Egypt, and North Africa. In Palestine, they had yet another learned chief, Sheich Abu al Ferag, who wrote a work, bearing his own name, concerning the principles of his sect, and which contains much that is absurd and blasphemous. He is the same Abu al Ferag who is frequently mentioned in the Opinions of Maimonides תשובות הרמב״ם. Anan had a wife who was called Al Me'alma, i. e. the learned, the instructress, who was acknowledged chief of his sect after the death of her husband, and was consulted in all cases of doubt; and as everything was decided according to her opinion and practice, it came to be customary to ask among the sect, "How did Al Me'alma on that occasion? or what was her practice in that case?" and every one looked up to her for guidance. When, at a later period, Rabbi Joseph Ben Ali became Nahssi in Africa, he used every effort to suppress this sect in all directions,--so that it was nearly dissolved, and but few vestiges are found thereof at the present time; since all that is left are the few Caraites קראים who only acknowledge the written law, are partly descended from the ancient Sadducees, and are found in several places in Asia and Egypt. We find mentioned in Abn Ezra's Commentary on the Pentateuch, several ridiculous expositions of many passages of Holy Writ ascribed to a certain Anan; it would, therefore, appear that he also had composed a commentary on the books of Moses.

In general the situation of the Jews, under the rule of the Mahomedans, was quite favourable, and considerably better than under the Greeks, since the former are naturally more favourably inclined to Judaism;--so that scarcely any persecution took place in this whole period. Only when the Calif Omar ibn Kataf banished, in the year 4398 (638), the Christians from Tiberias, the same fate was soon meted out to the Jews, and they also had to quit this place.

History Index



About Us Privacy Notice Disclaimer Contact Us
©2014 Jewish-American History Documentation Foundation
P.O. Box 760325
Lathrup Village, MI 48076


Yada wrote:
Thank you for exposing yourself with your language. Now go away and pester someone who likes ignorant foul-mouthed fools.

If Abu Bakr was a Jewish Rabbi I'm an alien from Mars. Obama has great credentials too, and yet everything he says is a lie. Credentials do not equate to truth.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline matt  
#378 Posted : Thursday, October 9, 2014 5:13:30 PM(UTC)
matt
Joined: 6/24/2014(UTC)
Posts: 21
United States

Thanks: 74 times
Was thanked: 7 time(s) in 5 post(s)
My IQ just dropped to the double digits while reading that^^^^.
Offline James  
#379 Posted : Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:20:48 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
C wrote:
Hey Yada, whenever anybody asks me my opinion of Islam, I tell then the truth of Islam as I know it from my study of Islam including TheProphetofDoom, and I do this even as a physician while working in Canada. I looked up the criminal code of Canada and one cannot be indicted for hate if what one what says is true and is not advocating physical harm. It is the Human Rights Commissions which run independently of the actual law which are the main threat to freedom of speech where a Muslim can complain and have a state funded appointed witch hunt against you, where you have you to pay your costs to defend. Ezra Levant wrote a book on this called Shakedown which describes his own and other fight against this politically correct immoral unconstitutional institution of bullying. I believe it was the BC human rights commission which has an issue with you, but the criminal code has nothing against you, I hope and believe. I was wondering if you could clarify you experience for me. C


Yada wrote:
The radio show I did that was used against me was broadcast in BC. The news stories affirming that I had been accused of hate speech came out of BC too. So your explanation is probably accurate. Thank you for sharing it. I've never defended myself, so I didn't bother to look into the complaint after someone sent me the articles.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 11/5/2016(UTC)
Offline James  
#380 Posted : Friday, January 2, 2015 10:18:03 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
JA wrote:
I need a very small favor. I know you're no longer in the business of exposing Islam, but right now I'm in a heated debate and I have my hands tied, because this devout Muslim is denying the importance of the Hadith and I strictly have to quote from the Qur'an and provide my interpretation. If I use the Hadith to validate the obvious concerning the old pedophile Muhammad he'll just deny it. He constantly accuses me of copying and pasting yet in prior replies I've literally typed verbatim directly from the Noble Qur'an translation. I want to throw in the towel, but no matter what response I provide this arrogant jackass has a nonsensical reply. This is the latest screed that he wrote.

"Ah, more ignorance.

59:2 That was a peaceful exile. The Jewish tribe of Ban'i Nadhir at Khaibar near Madinah were banished for repeatedly violating peace treaties by joining the Makkans. It states in the very verse you quote that they dismantled their own dwellings and left. Are you really such a noob? Do you even bother to comprehend what you cut before you paste it?

33:26 Are you serious? It literally states in the previous verses that the Muslims were attacked first! They were under siege by the a federation of idol worshippers who wanted an end to the "new" religion.. The very title of the Surah is "The Confederates". (33:1-25)

2:216 Once again you merely have to read further where it states that their enemies would not cease attacking them because of their faith. Literally in the next verse (2:217).

Are you seriously going to sit here and tell me you actually read the Qur'an when you do nothing but make the most idiotic errors? If you had but read anything surrounded those verse instead of isolating it and giving it your own biased interpretation you would not be looking so foolish. This clearly shows that you are cut and pasting from hate sites.

Again I already proved the Hadith are not required. It's a done deal. I'm right and you are wrong. Disagree? Feel free to refute my posts to [name removed] but we both know you can't. So keep on posting links to likeminded people (as if to legitimize your ignorance) whose opinions I have just as much crushed as yours."

I hate to clutter your inbox Yada, but a response would be greatly appreciated.

May Yahowah bless you and your loved ones always brother.

Kindest regards. I thoroughly enjoy the show. I will tune into tonight's BTR broadcast. If I can't listen to it live, I'll listen to the archive.

JA


Yada wrote:
JA,

I don't debate Muslims any more. It is a waste of time. But in this exchange, you let the Muslim set the ground rules, which makes it difficult to prevail on topics like pedophilia. So you have two choices. You can stick to the Qur'an and cite its most stupid statements or you can prove that Islam and the Qur'an don't exist without the Hadith, and in fact are based entirely on Hadith and move forward from there. For example, the person you are debating is refuting your criticisms of the Qur'an by incorrectly summarizing information that is only available from the Hadith. Without the Hadith he couldn't explain any of this, making him a hypocrite. So, what you have to do is correctly present what actually occurred by accurately citing the Hadith. As an example, the "Muslims were" NOT "attacked first." They were never "under siege." There was no "federation of idol worshipers." The first attack was Badr. It was a terrorist raid by Muhammad and Muslims against civilians who were minding their own business. It's detailed in the Hadith and in the 8th Surah.

But if your goal is to prevail, it's not going to happen. Religious people are immune to evidence and reason. Even citations they hold to be Scripture when shown to be invalid won't change their minds.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 11/5/2016(UTC)
Offline James  
#381 Posted : Tuesday, March 1, 2016 8:56:33 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
RH wrote:
Dear Mr Winn

I am reading through this book of yours and I am into the first 50 pages, I have to say so far this is one of the most devastating refutations of Islam I have ever read. Having left Islam more or less recently and being a former Islamist, this comprehensive damning refutation based entireley on a study of the Islamic Sources is what I believe is required to save millions of others from this disaster that has befallen too many people. I agree with the fact that Islam is not from Allah but an evil entity, I am glad you put forward thousands of textual evidences to back this up. This will be a great help for me and others trying to save people from this insanity.

However when going through the text I came across of couple of things that did not seem quite right and decided to check the references.

You wrote:
Qur’an 2:10 “As for those who deny Islam...they shall be the faggots for the Fire of Hell.” Islam’s god is a spirit of an entirely different color. [P17, What would you do]

Upon checking the verse says about those who disbelieve, "in their hearts is a disease (Maradun) and Allah has increased their disease. A painful torment in theirs because they tell lies". Where did faggots come from? Maradun does not translate as faggots anywhere in any translation as far as I can see?

You wrote:
This man was crediting the religion of Islam for transforming his brother into an unthinking killing machine. The motivation was purely racist: Bukhari:V1B1N6 “Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.” Innocent blood still dripping from his hands, Mas’ud proclaimed for all the world to hear: “Muhammad ordered me to murder.” Today’s terrorists haven’t corrupted their religion; their religion has corrupted them. [P25, What would you do]

This is not a statement attributed to Mohammed in this hadith and not about this incident or Masud, but that of Heraclius, the narration is a long one and he is talking about jews.. http://gowister.com/sahihbukhari-1-6.html " Heraclius was a foreteller and an astrologer. He replied, 'At night when I looked at the stars, I saw that the leader of those who practice circumcision had appeared (become the conqueror). Who are they who practice circumcision?' The people replied, 'Except the Jews nobody practices circumcision, so you should not be afraid of them (Jews). 'Just Issue orders to kill every Jew present in the country.'

You cannot just cherrypick a statement like this and attribute it to someone else out of its context, thats just not right.

How do you explain the above discrepancies ?? They look like clear falsifications of the texts, This will not bode well when I try and promote this book to others and will just be disregarded completley as it cannot be trusted, I do not want this to happens as this a very very important project, it has to be corrected. I wonder if there are any other errors like this, I will have to keep reading and see for myself.

Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Kind Regards


Yada wrote:
RH,

Congratulations on leaving Islam. I wish you all the best in awakening others.

The reference in the prologue is improperly cited. While it is an apt summation of a score of statements contained in the second sura of disbelievers being the fuel for the fires of hell, the specific use of "faggots" (which is kindling or fuel for a fire) is from Q21.98. The reference to 2.10 cannot be found in the 14th chapter, which is where I present the 2nd surah. The case against Islam isn't made in the prologue.

21.98.
AA Verily you and those you worship other than God will be faggots for Hell; and come to it you will. NQ Certainly! You (disbelievers) and that which you are worshipping now besides Allâh, are (but) fuel for Hell! (Surely), you will enter it.[]
PK Lo! ye (idolaters) and that which ye worship beside Allah are fuel of hell. Thereunto ye will come.
SH Surely you and what you worship besides Allah are the firewood of hell; to it you shall come.

There are probably 50 or so quotations in the Qur'an which depict disbelievers as the fuel of the hell fire or showing disbelievers being burned by Allah. So take your pick.

The story of Muhammad ordering the murder of Maslama is correctly presented and attested in the context of the book and in the prologue. I am not claiming that BV1B1N6 is part of that story, but instead I used it to affirm that Islam is racist. There are hundreds upon hundreds of anti Jewish statements in the Qur'an and Hadith. That statement was not attributed to Muhammad. But the fact remains, Muhammad ordered Ashraf to commit murder. There is no discrepancy here.

So you are correct, the first of these was improperly cited, but it accurately presents the message of the 2nd sura. The second criticism is invalid.

Evidence and reason will not prevail with a religious person. While many thousands of Muslims have been cured of Islam by the evidence in Prophet of Doom, for evidence and reason to prevail, the individual must first be open to questioning their religion.

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence in POD.

Good luck.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 11/5/2016(UTC)
Offline James  
#382 Posted : Monday, May 2, 2016 1:05:29 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
IQ wrote:
I hope all is well with you


Although we are not communicating, you are invariably on my mind especially when I am writing articles or addressing talk show subjects of discussion

It still remains (as far as I am concerned) beyond comprehension how the world leaders are utterly incapable of facing Facts & Reality where Islam & Muslims are concerned

The more they are in denial, the more ordinary people are turning to what the media maliciously calls 'Right wing parties'

No matter how outrageous my following statement may sound, I sincerely hope that within this year there will be a bloodbath in Europe between the indigenous peoples and the invaders otherwise Europe will be finished

Best regards

IQ


Yada wrote:
IQ,

I miss our discussions. Fact is, I miss the opportunity to talk about the events shaping our world with you. You are an extraordinary person. Your name enters my mind most every day.

We are headed to WWIII with evil leaders arming and inflaming the world. The press is cheering them one. We live in a world of dunderheads.

Yes, we predicted that the opposition to Islam would be right wing parties. They are nearly as bad as what they are opposing. They know almost nothing about Islam. You cannot side with them. The enemy of your enemy is not your friend.

I have long ago concluded that as bad as Islam is, and it is horrific, the poison of Political Correctness is even deadlier. It has put the world into a zombie-like comma, with the masses akin to the walking dead. Islam would be easy to expose, condemn, defeat, and eradicate if it were not for the consequence of Socialist Secular Humanism, which has rendered the human conscience dysfunctional.

I spend my days translating and writing akin. I'm seven long chapters into another book, this one called Observations for Our Time. I'll gladly share it with you should you be interested.

Yahowah hates Islam more than we do, but He also hates Christianity, Judaism, and Socialist Secular Humanism. He is opposed to government and their militaries, too. It's why I like Him so much.

You'd like Him too. He's a huge proponent of thinking, of observing the evidence and then drawing rational conclusions by making reasonable connections.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 11/5/2016(UTC)
Offline James  
#383 Posted : Tuesday, November 1, 2016 7:58:09 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
G wrote:
Hello Yada,

David is recommending your book prophet of doom in his video, link is below. I am not sure how to contact him, maybe he should invest some time in yadayah.com? Lots of swearing but understandable given his frustration.

https://youtu.be/NctrXM7GuM0

Blessings in Yahouuah's name
Shalom brother G


Yada wrote:
G,

I played it in the background for 15 minutes but gave up when he began with the "demolition" of the world trade centers. He's too foul mouthed and too Christian and pro military for me to endure.

I'd rather not have people like him speak about my books. It makes me look bad by association.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 11/5/2016(UTC)
Offline James  
#384 Posted : Monday, December 19, 2016 12:20:23 PM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
J wrote:
Yada - it's amazing how the US can make such a claim. From CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2016/...-isis-numbers/index.html


-J


Yada wrote:
It's new math. A year ago the US claimed that there were only 15,000 IS jihadists. Now the US has killed 75% of them and there are 15,000 left.
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
thanks 1 user thanked James for this useful post.
Fred Snell on 12/20/2016(UTC)
Offline James  
#385 Posted : Friday, April 7, 2017 7:53:33 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
JM wrote:
The Trump release sounds like George W Bush in paragraph 3:

“President Trump applauded President Al Sisi’s courageous efforts to promote moderate understandings of Islam, and the leaders agreed on the necessity of recognizing the peaceful nature of Islam and Muslims around the world.”

Surely Trump doesn’t believe Islam is a religion of peace. Is here hoping that if he pretends it’s peaceful that Muslim will live up to that claim?


Yada wrote:
JM,

Trump may have no conscience. He talks out of both sides of his mouth. This is especially true regarding Islam and Israel. And while promising one thing to get elected and then doing another is standard fare for politicians, Trump is especially dangerous because of the rabid nature of his Christian right following and his hubris. Sometimes I listen to him and wonder whether or not he is out of his mind.

Sisi is a murderous fundamentalist. His views on Islam are well known and they are identical to the Muslim Brotherhood. The only difference is the the MB distrusted the Egyptian military and Sisi is the Egyptian military. He is the most savage dictator in modern Egyptian history.

There is no such thing as moderate Islam. There is no such thing as peaceful Islam. Islam is the most deadly and destructive religion ever conceived by man. That is an irrefutable fact. So this entire release is an outright lie.

We are getting to know the real Trump, an poorly informed, inarticulate, egomaniac, without a conscience. I suspect that it's going to be a rough ride these next four years.

But then again, I'm not a player in the realm of politics so my observations and conclusions may be worthless. But since you asked, I think that Trump is extremely dangerous.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#386 Posted : Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:21:37 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
R wrote:
Here’s how to deal with muslims that want to practice their culture in the west.http://joeforamerica.com/2017/04/watch-happened-muslim-migrants-groped-woman-public/
R


Yada wrote:
R,

That is worth watching. That man did the right thing for the right reason. He was prepared and highly skilled. And yet the Muslims kept coming and no one other than his wife came to his aid. Wow. Welcome to what tolerance of evil brings.

I have advocated complete avoidance of Islam. Don't sell or give Muslims weapons. Don't invade or bomb Islamic countries. Don't empower jihad by buying oil from Islamic dictators. And don't allow Muslims to immigrate or build mosques outside of the countries they have already destroyed.

No one can fix Islam. It is best to leave it alone. Quarantine it.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#387 Posted : Wednesday, June 7, 2017 7:29:01 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
JD wrote:
Yada - this is brilliantly written and so true, every word of it.


Did you hear the woman on the CNN clip as she was walking out of the rubble towards the Iraqi army, raise her fist and shout out, "May Allah kill the infidels?" Who exactly was she referring to as "the infidels"?


Meanwhile, in London a "community vigil" to the victims featured Muslims dressed in Islamic religious garb parading along the bridge to the applause of other Londoners: http://www.cnn.com/2017/...igil-defiance/index.html


Yada wrote:
Yes, I heard her say that. In that 99% of Mosul's surviving Muslims are Sunni, the infidel reference could not have applied to the Islamic State in that they are fundamentalist Sunnis - a living example of what sunni actually means in Arabic. And since Sunnis consider Shia "infidels," the Shia Army and militias bombarding Mosul would qualify. But so would the United States. The US has been bombing Mosul for months.

Yes, Brits are responding to the Islamic attacks like zombies. They are praising the source of their pain. They do not understand what to hate or why to hate it. It is as if the entire nation has lost the ability to think or be moral.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Offline James  
#388 Posted : Wednesday, June 7, 2017 7:29:47 AM(UTC)
James
Joined: 10/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,514
Man
Location: Texas

Thanks: 5 times
Was thanked: 195 time(s) in 137 post(s)
JD wrote:
Yada - have you seen this article from the NY Post: http://nypost.com/2017/0...p-on-saving-afghanistan/


Yada wrote:
I've been saying this for 16 years. There is, was, and never will be any chance of success, only failure, in Afghanistan. Afghanistan, like Iraq and Libya is lose lose. All we have done is make bad situations worse.

Muslims do not want and will not accept what we want. They want what they have and should be allowed to endure it, no matter how deceitful, destructive, or deadly.

Nothing is ever resolved with bullets or bombs. No amount of force will prevail. We made a stupid mistake. Let's admit it, learn our lesson, and move on.

The issue is black and white, wrong and right.

Yada
Don't take my word for it, Look it up.

“The truth is not for all men but only for those who seek it.” ― Ayn Rand
Users browsing this topic
8 Pages«<678
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.